Literature DB >> 30815777

Association Between Travel Distance, Hospital Volume, and Outcomes Following Resection of Cholangiocarcinoma.

Eliza W Beal1, Rittal Mehta1, J Madison Hyer1, Anghela Paredes1, Katiuscha Merath1, Mary E Dillhoff1, Jordan Cloyd1, Aslam Ejaz1, Timothy M Pawlik2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to characterize the association between travel distance/hospital volume relative to outcomes following resection of cholangiocarcinoma.
METHODS: Patients were identified using the 2004-2015 National Cancer Database and stratified into quartiles according to travel distance/hospital volume. Multivariable regression models were utilized to examine the impact of travel distance and hospital volume on quality-of-care metrics and overall survival.
RESULTS: Among 5125 patients, the majority of patients had T1/2 (N = 2006, 41.1%) and N0 disease (N = 2498, 50.9%). Median hospital quartile surgical volumes in cases/year were low volume (LV) 6, intermediate low volume (ILV) 7, intermediate high volume (IHV) 12, and high volume (HV) 24 cases/year. Median travel distance quartiles in miles were short travel (ST) 2.7, intermediate short travel (IST) 7.9, intermediate long travel (ILT) 18.9, and long travel (LT) 84.7. Longer travel distances were associated with better overall survival, as every 10 miles was associated with a 2% decrease in mortality (p = 0.02). Differences in quality-of-care metrics were largely mediated through travel distance.
CONCLUSIONS: Travel distance and hospital volume were associated with certain quality-of-care metrics among patients with cholangiocarcinoma. After controlling for hospital volume and travel distance simultaneously, only travel distance was associated with decreased risk of mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital volume; Travel distance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30815777     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04162-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  22 in total

1.  Associations Between Travel Distance, Hospital Volume, and Outcomes Following Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Leilei Xia; Benjamin L Taylor; Ronac Mamtani; John P Christodouleas; Thomas J Guzzo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Fabian M Johnston; Howard Nelson-Williams; Marcelo Cerullo; Mary E Dillhoff; Carl R Schmidt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End-Stage Liver Disease Patients.

Authors:  K Ross; R E Patzer; D S Goldberg; R J Lynch
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 4.  Using the National Cancer Database for Outcomes Research: A Review.

Authors:  Daniel J Boffa; Joshua E Rosen; Katherine Mallin; Ashley Loomis; Greer Gay; Bryan Palis; Kathleen Thoburn; Donna Gress; Daniel P McKellar; Lawrence N Shulman; Matthew A Facktor; David P Winchester
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 5.  Challenges of surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Malcolm H Squires; Jordan M Cloyd; Mary Dillhoff; Carl Schmidt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 6.  Liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma: current best practice.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.640

7.  Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; John A Cowan; James A Knol; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-02

8.  Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single UK HPB centre experience.

Authors:  S Mukherjee; H M Kocher; R R Hutchins; S Bhattacharya; A T Abraham
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Going the Extra Mile: Improved Survival for Pancreatic Cancer Patients Traveling to High-volume Centers.

Authors:  Michael E Lidsky; Zhifei Sun; Daniel P Nussbaum; Mohamed A Adam; Paul J Speicher; Dan G Blazer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The Effects of Travel Burden on Outcomes After Resection of Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancies: Results from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Consortium.

Authors:  Sean C O'Connor; Harveshp Mogal; Gregory Russell; Cecilia Ethun; Ryan C Fields; Linda Jin; Ioannis Hatzaras; Gerardo Vitiello; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Robert Martin; Charles Scoggins; Timothy M Pawlik; Carl Schmidt; George Poultsides; Thuy B Tran; Sharon Weber; Ahmed Salem; Shishir Maithel; Perry Shen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  3 in total

1.  Geographic Disparities in Oncologic Treatment and Outcomes: The Urban-Rural Divide.

Authors:  Adrian Diaz; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Optimal surgeon and hospital volume thresholds to reduce mortality and length of stay for CABG.

Authors:  Ying-Yi Chou; Juey-Jen Hwang; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Is Treatment at a High-volume Center Associated with an Improved Survival for Primary Malignant Bone Tumors?

Authors:  Azeem Tariq Malik; John H Alexander; Safdar N Khan; Thomas J Scharschmidt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.