Johan Ohlander1, Mekail-Cem Keskin2, Stephan W Weiler2, Joachim Stork2, Katja Radon3. 1. Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany. johan.ohlander@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. AUDI Gesundheitszentrum, AUDI AG, 85045, Ingolstadt, Germany. 3. Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The use of snap-fits in car-part assembling has developed into an industrial standard. Cross-sectional evidence indicates, however, that this assembling process might adversely affect workers' upper limb function. The objective of this study was to analyze incident cases of upper limb functional limitations (ULFL) in relation to exposure to snap-fit assembly. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study within a population of 5139 blue-collar automotive production workers. Cases with ULFL detected during follow-up were matched with controls based on employment duration and investigated on their exposure to snap-fit assembly. By conditional logistic regression, we modeled the risk for ULFL according to person-years of exposure to snap-fit assembly, adjusted for gender and baseline BMI. RESULTS: Overall, 64 ULFL cases were detected during a follow-up of 20610.8 person-years (3.1 cases per 1000 person-years). Cases, matched with an average of 4 controls, had significantly longer exposure duration to snap-fit assembly compared with controls (M = 1.15 person-years, SD = 1.68 person-years vs. M = 0.41 person-years, SD = 1.25 person-years). One person-year of exposure to snap-fit assembly was associated with an approximate 20% risk increase of developing ULFLs (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm an association between accumulated exposure to snap-fits in car-part assembling and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Company physicians should thus be vigilant to symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limbs in snap-fit assembly and support the development of threshold values for snap-fit insertion forces.
OBJECTIVES: The use of snap-fits in car-part assembling has developed into an industrial standard. Cross-sectional evidence indicates, however, that this assembling process might adversely affect workers' upper limb function. The objective of this study was to analyze incident cases of upper limb functional limitations (ULFL) in relation to exposure to snap-fit assembly. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study within a population of 5139 blue-collar automotive production workers. Cases with ULFL detected during follow-up were matched with controls based on employment duration and investigated on their exposure to snap-fit assembly. By conditional logistic regression, we modeled the risk for ULFL according to person-years of exposure to snap-fit assembly, adjusted for gender and baseline BMI. RESULTS: Overall, 64 ULFL cases were detected during a follow-up of 20610.8 person-years (3.1 cases per 1000 person-years). Cases, matched with an average of 4 controls, had significantly longer exposure duration to snap-fit assembly compared with controls (M = 1.15 person-years, SD = 1.68 person-years vs. M = 0.41 person-years, SD = 1.25 person-years). One person-year of exposure to snap-fit assembly was associated with an approximate 20% risk increase of developing ULFLs (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm an association between accumulated exposure to snap-fits in car-part assembling and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Company physicians should thus be vigilant to symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limbs in snap-fit assembly and support the development of threshold values for snap-fit insertion forces.
Authors: Robert A Werner; Alfred Franzblau; Nancy Gell; Anne G Hartigan; Marissa Ebersole; Thomas J Armstrong Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Věra Žídková; Marie Nakládalová; Jana Zapletalová; Zdeněk Nakládal; Helena Kollárová Journal: Int J Occup Med Environ Health Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 1.843
Authors: Jutta Scharnbacher; Matthias Claus; Jörg Reichert; Tobias Röhrl; Ulrich Hoffmann; Kurt Ulm; Stephan Letzel; Dennis Nowak Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Bethany T Gardner; Ann Marie Dale; Linda VanDillen; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.079
Authors: Cameron A Mustard; Andrea Chambers; Selahadin Ibrahim; Jacob Etches; Peter Smith Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Ana Assunção; Vera Moniz-Pereira; Carlos Fujão; Sarah Bernardes; António P Veloso; Filomena Carnide Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 3.390