Hyo Jeong Kang1, Farhan Haq2, Chang Ohk Sung1, Jene Choi1, Seung-Mo Hong1, Soo-Heang Eo3, Hui Jeong Jeong1, Jinho Shin1, Ju Hyun Shim4, Han Chu Lee4, Jihyun An4, Mi-Ju Kim5, Kyu-Pyo Kim6, Sung-Min Ahn7, Eunsil Yu1. 1. Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Biosciences, COMSATS Institute of Information and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan. 3. Department of Statistics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 6. Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 7. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Gachon Institute of Genome Medicine and Science, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: FGF19 amplification is a relatively novel type of genetic aberration that has been proposed to be a driver of hepatocarcinogenesis. Selective inhibitors of FGFR4, a receptor of FGF19, have been developed as targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the role of FGF19 in mediating HCC progression, the clinicopathological characterization of patients exhibiting FGF19 amplification remains unclear. Immunohistochemical staining is the simplest and most widely used method of identifying aberrations in the FGF19 gene, although its specificity is very low. METHODS: This study investigated the prognostic significance of FGF19 amplification in a large cohort of 989 HCC patients using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which has a high degree of specificity. In addition, FISH data from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were compared with copy number variation (CNV) data obtained from fresh frozen sections to validate the use of FISH as a diagnostic tool. RESULTS: FGF19 amplifications were detected by FISH in 51 (5.15%) of the 989 patients, and were independently associated with poor survival and a higher risk of tumor recurrence, as well as with poor prognostic factors such as a high α-fetoprotein level, hepatitis B or C virus infection, a large tumor size, microvascular invasion, and necrosis. In addition, FGF19 amplification was associated with TP53 mutation, and was mutually exclusive with CTNNB1 mutation. The results of the FISH and CNV analyses exhibited a significant concordance rate of 96% (κ = 0.618, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that FGF19 amplification represents a unique molecular subtype associated with poor prognostic characteristics, which supports the hypothesis that the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway plays an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis. We have also demonstrated that FISH is a viable alternative to CNV analysis, offering a number of advantages in the clinical setting.
BACKGROUND: FGF19 amplification is a relatively novel type of genetic aberration that has been proposed to be a driver of hepatocarcinogenesis. Selective inhibitors of FGFR4, a receptor of FGF19, have been developed as targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the role of FGF19 in mediating HCC progression, the clinicopathological characterization of patients exhibiting FGF19 amplification remains unclear. Immunohistochemical staining is the simplest and most widely used method of identifying aberrations in the FGF19 gene, although its specificity is very low. METHODS: This study investigated the prognostic significance of FGF19 amplification in a large cohort of 989 HCC patients using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which has a high degree of specificity. In addition, FISH data from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were compared with copy number variation (CNV) data obtained from fresh frozen sections to validate the use of FISH as a diagnostic tool. RESULTS: FGF19 amplifications were detected by FISH in 51 (5.15%) of the 989 patients, and were independently associated with poor survival and a higher risk of tumor recurrence, as well as with poor prognostic factors such as a high α-fetoprotein level, hepatitis B or C virus infection, a large tumor size, microvascular invasion, and necrosis. In addition, FGF19 amplification was associated with TP53 mutation, and was mutually exclusive with CTNNB1 mutation. The results of the FISH and CNV analyses exhibited a significant concordance rate of 96% (κ = 0.618, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that FGF19 amplification represents a unique molecular subtype associated with poor prognostic characteristics, which supports the hypothesis that the FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway plays an important role in hepatocarcinogenesis. We have also demonstrated that FISH is a viable alternative to CNV analysis, offering a number of advantages in the clinical setting.
Entities:
Keywords:
FGF19; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Hepatocellular carcinoma; High copy number amplification; Prognosis
Authors: Eric T Sawey; Maia Chanrion; Chunlin Cai; Guanming Wu; Jianping Zhang; Lars Zender; Alice Zhao; Ronald W Busuttil; Herman Yee; Lincoln Stein; Dorothy M French; Richard S Finn; Scott W Lowe; Scott Powers Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: L R Desnoyers; R Pai; R E Ferrando; K Hötzel; T Le; J Ross; R Carano; A D'Souza; J Qing; I Mohtashemi; A Ashkenazi; D M French Journal: Oncogene Date: 2007-06-25 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Katrina Nicholes; Susan Guillet; Elizabeth Tomlinson; Kenneth Hillan; Barbara Wright; Gretchen D Frantz; Thinh A Pham; Lisa Dillard-Telm; Siao Ping Tsai; Jean-Philippe Stephan; Jeremy Stinson; Timothy Stewart; Dorothy M French Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Dorothy M French; Benjamin C Lin; Manping Wang; Camellia Adams; Theresa Shek; Kathy Hötzel; Brad Bolon; Ronald Ferrando; Craig Blackmore; Kurt Schroeder; Luis A Rodriguez; Maria Hristopoulos; Rayna Venook; Avi Ashkenazi; Luc R Desnoyers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Clelia Donisi; Marco Puzzoni; Pina Ziranu; Eleonora Lai; Stefano Mariani; Giorgio Saba; Valentino Impera; Marco Dubois; Mara Persano; Marco Migliari; Andrea Pretta; Nicole Liscia; Giorgio Astara; Mario Scartozzi Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 6.244