Literature DB >> 30815195

Identifying Cases of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Using Machine Learning on Electronic Health Records.

Martin G Seneviratne1, Juan M Banda1, James D Brooks2, Nigam H Shah1, Tina M Hernandez-Boussard1.   

Abstract

Cancer stage is rarely captured in structured form in the electronic health record (EHR). We evaluate the performance of a classifier, trained on structured EHR data, in identifying prostate cancer patients with metastatic disease. Using EHR data for a cohort of 5,861 prostate cancer patients mapped to the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) data model, we constructed feature vectors containing frequency counts of conditions, procedures, medications, observations and laboratory values. Staging information from the California Cancer Registry was used as the ground-truth. For identifying patients with metastatic disease, a random forest model achieved precision and recall of 0.90, 0.40 using data within 12 months of diagnosis. This compared to precision 0.33, recall 0.54 for an ICD code-based query. High-precision classifiers using hundreds of structured data elements significantly outperform ICD queries, and may assist in identifying cohorts for observational research or clinical trial matching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30815195      PMCID: PMC6371284     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  10 in total

1.  Cancer Staging in Electronic Health Records: Strategies to Improve Documentation of These Critical Data.

Authors:  Tracey L Evans; Peter E Gabriel; Lawrence N Shulman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Symbolic rule-based classification of lung cancer stages from free-text pathology reports.

Authors:  Anthony N Nguyen; Michael J Lawley; David P Hansen; Rayleen V Bowman; Belinda E Clarke; Edwina E Duhig; Shoni Colquist
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Natural Language Processing in Oncology: A Review.

Authors:  Wen-Wai Yim; Meliha Yetisgen; William P Harris; Sharon W Kwan
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Automatically extracting cancer disease characteristics from pathology reports into a Disease Knowledge Representation Model.

Authors:  Anni Coden; Guergana Savova; Igor Sominsky; Michael Tanenblatt; James Masanz; Karin Schuler; James Cooper; Wei Guan; Piet C de Groen
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  ReCAP: Feasibility and Accuracy of Extracting Cancer Stage Information From Narrative Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  Jeremy L Warner; Mia A Levy; Michael N Neuss; Jeremy L Warner; Mia A Levy; Michael N Neuss
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; Jon D Duke; Nigam H Shah; Christian G Reich; Vojtech Huser; Martijn J Schuemie; Marc A Suchard; Rae Woong Park; Ian Chi Kei Wong; Peter R Rijnbeek; Johan van der Lei; Nicole Pratt; G Niklas Norén; Yu-Chuan Li; Paul E Stang; David Madigan; Patrick B Ryan
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2015

8.  Identifying primary and recurrent cancers using a SAS-based natural language processing algorithm.

Authors:  Justin A Strauss; Chun R Chao; Marilyn L Kwan; Syed A Ahmed; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Electronic phenotyping with APHRODITE and the Observational Health Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) data network.

Authors:  Juan M Banda; Yoni Halpern; David Sontag; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2017-07-26

10.  Architecture and Implementation of a Clinical Research Data Warehouse for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Martin G Seneviratne; Tina Seto; Douglas W Blayney; James D Brooks; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2018-06-01
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Extending the OMOP Common Data Model and Standardized Vocabularies to Support Observational Cancer Research.

Authors:  Rimma Belenkaya; Michael J Gurley; Asieh Golozar; Dmitry Dymshyts; Robert T Miller; Andrew E Williams; Shilpa Ratwani; Anastasios Siapos; Vladislav Korsik; Jeremy Warner; W Scott Campbell; Donna Rivera; Tatiana Banokina; Elizaveta Modina; Shantha Bethusamy; Henry Morgan Stewart; Meera Patel; Ruijun Chen; Thomas Falconer; Rae Woong Park; Seng Chan You; Hokyun Jeon; Soe Jeong Shin; Christian Reich
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-01

Review 2.  From Patient Engagement to Precision Oncology: Leveraging Informatics to Advance Cancer Care.

Authors:  Ashley C Griffin; Umit Topaloglu; Sean Davis; Arlene E Chung
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2020-08-21

Review 3.  Research and Application of Artificial Intelligence Based on Electronic Health Records of Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xinyu Yang; Dongmei Mu; Hao Peng; Hua Li; Ying Wang; Ping Wang; Yue Wang; Siqi Han
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 4.  OMOP CDM Can Facilitate Data-Driven Studies for Cancer Prediction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Najia Ahmadi; Yuan Peng; Markus Wolfien; Michéle Zoch; Martin Sedlmayr
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.