Literature DB >> 30815175

Clinical Documentation in Electronic Health Record Systems: Analysis of Similarity in Progress Notes from Consecutive Outpatient Ophthalmology Encounters.

Abigail E Huang1,2, Michelle R Hribar2, Isaac H Goldstein3, Brad Henriksen3, Wei-Chun Lin2, Michael F Chiang2,3.   

Abstract

Content importing technology enables duplication of large amounts of clinical text in electronic health record (EHR) progress notes. It can be difficult to find key sections such as Assessment and Plan in the resulting note. To quantify the extent of text length and duplication, we analyzed average ophthalmology note length and calculated novelty of each major note section (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan, Other). We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive note pairs and found that the average encounter note was 1182 ± 374 words long and less than a quarter of words changed between visits. The Plan note section had the highest percentage of change, and both the Assessment and Plan sections comprised a small fraction of the full note. Analysis of progress notes by section and unique content helps describe physician documentation activity and inform best practices and EHR design recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30815175      PMCID: PMC6371381     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  19 in total

1.  Copy and paste of electronic health records: a modern medical illness.

Authors:  Arie Markel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  What do physicians read (and ignore) in electronic progress notes?

Authors:  P J Brown; J L Marquard; B Amster; M Romoser; J Friderici; S Goff; D Fisher
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Characterizing the Source of Text in Electronic Health Record Progress Notes.

Authors:  Michael D Wang; Raman Khanna; Nader Najafi
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  A qualitative analysis of EHR clinical document synthesis by clinicians.

Authors:  Oladimeji Farri; David S Pieckiewicz; Ahmed S Rahman; Terrence J Adam; Serguei V Pakhomov; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  Accuracy and speed of electronic health record versus paper-based ophthalmic documentation strategies.

Authors:  Patrick Chan; Preeti J Thyparampil; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 6.  Copy, paste, and cloned notes in electronic health records: prevalence, benefits, risks, and best practice recommendations.

Authors:  Justin M Weis; Paul C Levy
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Physicians' attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing.

Authors:  Heather C O'Donnell; Rainu Kaushal; Yolanda Barrón; Mark A Callahan; Ronald D Adelman; Eugenia L Siegler
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Transition from paper to electronic inpatient physician notes.

Authors:  Thomas H Payne; Aharon E tenBroek; Grant S Fletcher; Mardi C Labuguen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in ophthalmology at an academic medical center (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Sarah Read-Brown; Daniel C Tu; Dongseok Choi; David S Sanders; Thomas S Hwang; Steven Bailey; Daniel J Karr; Elizabeth Cottle; John C Morrison; David J Wilson; Thomas R Yackel
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2013-09

10.  Detecting clinically relevant new information in clinical notes across specialties and settings.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Serguei V S Pakhomov; Elliot G Arsoniadis; Janet T Lee; Yan Wang; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  7 in total

1.  Forced Inefficiencies of the Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Michael Weiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Electronic Health Records in Ophthalmology: Source and Method of Documentation.

Authors:  Bradley S Henriksen; Isaac H Goldstein; Adam Rule; Abigail E Huang; Haley Dusek; Austin Igelman; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Writing Is Thinking: Implementation and Evaluation of an Internal Medicine Residency Clinical Reasoning and Documentation Curriculum.

Authors:  Karl M Richardson; Joseph A Cristiano; Katherine R Schafer; E Shen; Cynthia A Burns
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Clinical Documentation as End-User Programming.

Authors:  Adam Rule; Isaac H Goldstein; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2020-04

5.  Changes in Electronic Health Record Use Time and Documentation over the Course of a Decade.

Authors:  Isaac H Goldstein; Thomas Hwang; Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Ryan Bales; Michael F Chiang; Michelle R Hribar
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Multicenter Analysis of Electronic Health Record Use among Ophthalmologists.

Authors:  Sally L Baxter; Helena E Gali; Mitul C Mehta; Scott E Rudkin; John Bartlett; James D Brandt; Catherine Q Sun; Marlene Millen; Christopher A Longhurst
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Electronic health record note review in an outpatient specialty clinic: who is looking?

Authors:  Jimmy S Chen; Michelle R Hribar; Isaac H Goldstein; Adam Rule; Wei-Chun Lin; Haley Dusek; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-07-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.