Literature DB >> 30815167

Improving breast cancer risk prediction by using demographic risk factors, abnormality features on mammograms and genetic variants.

Shara I Feld1, Kaitlin M Woo2, Roxana Alexandridis2, Yirong Wu1, Jie Liu3, Peggy Peissig4, Adedayo A Onitilo4,5, Jennifer Cox1,2,3,4,5, C David Page2, Elizabeth S Burnside1.   

Abstract

The predictive capability of combining demographic risk factors, germline genetic variants, and mammogram abnormality features for breast cancer risk prediction is poorly understood. We evaluated the predictive performance of combinations of demographic risk factors, high risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and mammography features for women recommended for breast biopsy in a retrospective case-control study (n = 768) with four logistic regression models. The AUC of the baseline demographic features model was 0.580. Both genetic variants and mammography abnormality features augmented the performance of the baseline model: demographics + SNP (AUC =0.668), demographics + mammography (AUC =0.702). Finally, we found that the demographics + SNP + mammography model (AUC = 0.753) had the greatest predictive power, with a significant performance improvement over the other models. The combination of demographic risk factors, genetic variants and imaging features improves breast cancer risk prediction over prior methods utilizing only a subset of these features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30815167      PMCID: PMC6371301     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  42 in total

1.  A tiny step closer to personalized risk prediction for breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Devilee; Matti A Rookus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Patricia Hartge; Ross Prentice; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Heather Spencer Feigelson; W Ryan Diver; Michael J Thun; David G Cox; Susan E Hankinson; Peter Kraft; Bernard Rosner; Christine D Berg; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Mark E Sherman; Rowan Chlebowski; Charles Kooperberg; Rebecca D Jackson; Dennis W Buckman; Peter Hui; Ruth Pfeiffer; Kevin B Jacobs; Gilles D Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Mitchell H Gail; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Polygenes, risk prediction, and targeted prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Paul D P Pharoah; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Bruce A J Ponder
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A comprehensive methodology for determining the most informative mammographic features.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Oguzhan Alagoz; Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; David J Vanness; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Comparing Mammography Abnormality Features to Genetic Variants in the Prediction of Breast Cancer in Women Recommended for Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Jie Liu; Yirong Wu; Adedayo A Onitilo; Catherine A McCarty; C David Page; Peggy L Peissig; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Terrie Kitchner; Jun Fan; Ming Yuan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Genetic tests and genomic biomarkers: regulation, qualification and validation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Novelli; Cinzia Ciccacci; Paola Borgiani; Marisa Papaluca Amati; Eric Abadie
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2008-05

7.  Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Daniel L Rubin; Jason P Fine; Ross D Shachter; Gale A Sisney; Winifred K Leung
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast cancer risk prediction and mammography biopsy decisions: a model-based study.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Elizabeth A Handorf; Jinbo Chen; Mirar N Bristol Demeter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement.

Authors:  Hatef Darabi; Kamila Czene; Wanting Zhao; Jianjun Liu; Per Hall; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  New genetic variants improve personalized breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jie Liu; David Page; Peggy Peissig; Catherine McCarty; Adedayo A Onitilo; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2014-04-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Prediction of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Reza Rabiei; Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh; Solmaz Sohrabei; Marzieh Esmaeili; Alireza Atashi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-06-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.