Literature DB >> 30815111

Goal-driven management of interacting clinical guidelines for multimorbidity patients.

Alexandra Kogan1, Samson W Tu2, Mor Peleg1.   

Abstract

Computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) are based on clinical practice guidelines, which typically address a single morbidity. However, most of the aging population suffers from multiple morbidities. Currently, there is no demonstrated effective mechanism that integrates recommendations from multiple CIGs. We are developing a goal-based method that utilizes knowledge of drugs' physiological effects and therapeutic usage to combine knowledge from CIGs. It incrementally detects interactions and plans non-contradicting therapies. Our algorithm uses patterns to check consistency and respond to events, including data enquiries, diagnoses, adverse events, recommended medications, tests, and goals. Our method utilizes existing standards and CIG tools, including the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) patient data model, SNOMED-CT, and the PROforma CIG formalism with its Alium knowledge-engineering environment and PROforma enactment engine. We demonstrate our approach using a case study involving two clinical guidelines with templates for responding to a new goal and to a medication request that causes an inconsistency which can be automatically detected and resolved based on the knowledge of the two CIGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30815111      PMCID: PMC6371243     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  8 in total

1.  The syntax and semantics of the PROforma guideline modeling language.

Authors:  David R Sutton; John Fox
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.

Authors:  Mor Peleg
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Management of patients with ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Loren Laine; Dennis M Jensen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Analyzing interactions on combining multiple clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Veruska Zamborlini; Marcos da Silveira; Cedric Pruski; Annette Ten Teije; Edwin Geleijn; Marike van der Leeden; Martijn Stuiver; Frank van Harmelen
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Cognitive systems at the point of care: The CREDO program.

Authors:  John Fox
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Temporal detection and analysis of guideline interactions.

Authors:  Luca Anselma; Luca Piovesan; Paolo Terenziani
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance.

Authors:  Cynthia M Boyd; Jonathan Darer; Chad Boult; Linda P Fried; Lisa Boult; Albert W Wu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comprehensive mitigation framework for concurrent application of multiple clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Szymon Wilk; Martin Michalowski; Wojtek Michalowski; Daniela Rosu; Marc Carrier; Mounira Kezadri-Hamiaz
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 6.317

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation.

Authors:  Peter Taber; Christina Radloff; Guilherme Del Fiol; Catherine Staes; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2021-09-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.