| Literature DB >> 30814653 |
Daniela Miranda-Silva1, Patrícia Gonçalves-Rodrigues1, João Almeida-Coelho1, Nazha Hamdani2, Tânia Lima1, Glória Conceição1, Cláudia Sousa-Mendes1, Arantxa González3,4, Javier Díez3,4, Wolfgang A Linke5, Adelino Leite-Moreira1, Inês Falcão-Pires6.
Abstract
Aortic Stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvulopathy in the western world. Traditionally aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been recommended immediately after the onset of heart failure (HF) symptoms. However, recent evidence suggests that AVR outcome can be improved if performed earlier. After AVR, the process of left ventricle (LV) reverse remodelling (RR) is variable and frequently incomplete. In this study, we aimed at detecting mechanism underlying the process of LV RR regarding myocardial structural, functional and molecular changes before the onset of HF symptoms. Wistar-Han rats were subjected to 7-weeks of ascending aortic-banding followed by a 2-week period of debanding to resemble AS-induced LV remodelling and the early events of AVR-induced RR, respectively. This resulted in 3 groups: Sham (n = 10), Banding (Ba, n = 15) and Debanding (Deb, n = 10). Concentric hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction (DD) were patent in the Ba group. Aortic-debanding induced RR, which promoted LV functional recovery, while cardiac structure did not normalise. Cardiac parameters of RV dysfunction, assessed by echocardiography and at the cardiomyocyte level prevailed altered after debanding. After debanding, these alterations were accompanied by persistent changes in pathways associated to myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis and LV inflammation. Aortic banding induced pulmonary arterial wall thickness to increase and correlates negatively with effort intolerance and positively with E/e' and left atrial area. We described dysregulated pathways in LV and RV remodelling and RR after AVR. Importantly we showed important RV-side effects of aortic constriction, highlighting the impact that LV-reverse remodelling has on both ventricles.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30814653 PMCID: PMC6393473 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39581-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Left Ventricle morphological and functional data.
| Sh (n = 10) | Ba (n = 15) | Deb (n = 10) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| BSA (cm2) | 4.873 ± 0.035 | 4.947 ± 0.080 | 4.916 ± 0.080 |
| AWd (cm) | 0.143 ± 0.006 | 0.202 ± 0.005αααα | 0.168 ± 0.010χχ |
| LVd (cm) | 0.743 ± 0.013 | 0.696 ± 0.014α | 0.769 ± 0.016χχ |
| PWd (cm) | 0.138 ± 0.007 | 0.206 ± 0.008αααα | 0.166 ± 0.008αχχ |
| AWs (cm) | 0.220 ± 0.005 | 0.306 ± 0.008αααα | 0.252 ± 0.012αχχ |
| LVs (cm) | 0.448 ± 0.025 | 0.383 ± 0.013α | 0.467 ± 0.029χχ |
| PWs (cm) | 0.216 ± 0.005 | 0.307 ± 0.011αααα | 0.263 ± 0.010 ααχ |
| LVMass (g) | 0.688 ± 0.035 | 1.070 ± 0.032αααα | 0.908 ± 0.037ααχχ |
| EDVI (µL.cm−2) | 187.119 ± 8.217 | 165.833 ± 8.434α | 205.797 ± 13.445χχ |
| ESVI (µL.cm−2) | 42.437 ± 4.727 | 29.874 ± 2.797α | 50.469 ± 8.388χχ |
| E/A | 1.547 ± 0.074 | 1.354 ± 0.041α | 1.571 ± 0.107χ |
| E/E′ | 13.456 ± 0.694 | 18.635 ± 0.995αα | 14.667 ± 0.702χ |
| EF (%) | 74 ± 4 | 78 ± 3 | 74 ± 3 |
| LAA (cm2) | 0.314 ± 0.015 | 0.421 ± 0.021ααα | 0.370 ± 0.011α |
| Ao. Velocity (m.s−1) | 1.53 ± 0.19 | 4.14 ± 0.21αααα | 2.3 ± 0.15αχχχχ |
|
| |||
| LVSP (mmHg) | 113.47 ± 3.39 | 187.64 ± 11.62αααα | 123.7 ± 3.82χχχ |
| LVEDP (mmHg) | 4.68 ± 1.13 | 10.63 ± 1.70αα | 5.11 ± 0.79χχ |
| HR (bpm) | 381 ± 15 | 399 ± 8 | 410 ± 12 |
| EA (mmHg.µL−1) | 0.70 ± 0.08 | 1.07 ± 0.14αααα | 0.90 ± 0.12ααχχ |
| ESPVR (mmHg.µL−1) | 0.47 ± 0.16 | 1.16 ± 0.35αα | 0.44 ± 0.09χ |
| EDPVR (mmHg.µL−1) | 0.014 ± 0.004 | 0.031 ± 0.008α | 0.023 ± 0.05 |
| Tau (ms) | 7.57 ± 0.42 | 9.18 ± 0.55α | 7.60 ± 0.34χ |
Body surface area; AWd, anterior wall in diastole; LVd, left ventricle cavity in diastole; PWd, posterior wall in diastole; AWs, anterior wall in systole; LVs, left ventricle cavity in systole; PWs, posterior wall in systole; LVMass, left ventricle mass; EDVI, end-diastolic volume index; ESVI, end- systolic volume index; HR, heart rate; E′, wave velocity of tissue Doppler at the lateral mitral annulus; E, peak of pulse Doppler wave of early mitral flow velocity; A, peak of pulse Doppler wave of late mitral flow velocity; E/A, ratio between peak E and A waves; E/E′ ratio between E and E′ waves; TEI index, myocardial performance index; EF, ejection fraction; LAA, left atrium area; Ao. Velocity, aortic velocities; LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure; LVEDP, left ventricle end-diastolic pressure; HR, heart rate; ESPVR, end-systolic pressure volume relationship; EDPVR, end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; Tau, constant of relaxation. Values are mean ± SEM. One Way-ANOVA, Ba/Deb vs Sh: αp < 0.05; ααp < 0.01; αααp < 0.001; Deb vs Ba: χp < 0.05; χχp < 0.01, χχχp < 0.001.
Figure 1Effect of pressure overload on left ventricular hypertrophy, fibrosis, LV passive tension and extracellular matrix remodelling. (A) Cardiomyocytes area evaluated by histology; Western blot relative quantification of: (B) ratio of phosphorylated to total AKT; (C) ratio of phosphorylated to total mTOR; (D) ratio of phosphorylated to total glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β); (E) cardiomyocytes passive tension; (F) ratio of S26 phosphorylation to total Titin PEVK segment; (G) ratio of pPKCα to total PKCα phosphorylation; (H) myocardial fibrosis; (I) mRNA expression of procollagen type-I; (J) mRNA expression of procollagen type-III; (K) lysyl oxidase; (L) mRNA expression of Transforming growth factor beta, (M) Interleukin-6; (N) ratio of phospho to total Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; (O) representative images of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis; (P) representative western blot lanes. For representative purposes the image was cropped and edited; (Q) representative membrane protein loading. n = 7 for each group. Values are mean ± SEM, Two-way ANOVA for passive tension, One-way ANOVA for the remaining data. Ba/Deb vs Sh: αp < 0.05; ααp < 0.01; αααp < 0.001; Deb vs Ba: χp < 0.05; χχp < 0.01.
Figure 2Effect of pressure overload on LV cardiomyocytes and calcium handling. (A) Cardiomyocytes active tension; (B) myofilaments calcium sensitivity; (C) Hill-coefficient; (D) the rate of tension redevelopment (Ktr); protein quantification of: (E) sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase 2a (SERCA2a); (F) ratio of SERCA2a to phospholamban; (G) sodium-calcium exchanger; (H) ratio of phosphorylated to total Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CAMKii); mRNA expression of calcium-binding protein A1 (S100A1); (J) representative western blot lanes. For representative purposes the image was cropped and edited; (K) representative membrane protein loading. Values are mean ± SEM. One Way-ANOVA: Ba/Deb vs Sh: αp < 0.05; ααp < 0.01; αααp < 0.001; Deb vs Ba: χp < 0.05; χχp < 0.01, χχχp < 0.001.
Right ventricle morphological and functional data.
| Sh (n = 7) | Ba (n = 10) | Deb (n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAA (cm2) | 0.207 ± 0.006 | 0.246 ± 0.009αα | 0.254 ± 0.009αα |
| TAPSE (cm) | 0.306 ± 0.009 | 0.230 ± 0.013ααα | 0.257 ± 0.008α |
| S′ (ms) | 0.065 ± 0.003 | 0.0499 ± 0.004αα | 0.057 ± 0.003 |
| E′ (ms) | 0.064 ± 0.007 | 0.044 ± 0.005α | 0.041 ± 0.003α |
| E (ms) | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.39 ± 0.03 |
| A (ms) | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.05αα | 0.58 ± 0.06α |
| E/A | 0.95 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.06αααα | 0.68 ± 0.05αα |
| Lungs/BW (g.Kg−1) | 4.300 ± 0.117 | 4.821 ± 0.168α | 4.316 ± 0.101χ |
| VO2max (ml.min−1.kg0.75) | 33.3 ± 1.0 | 29.2 ± 0.7αα | 31.3 ± 0.8 |
RV, Right ventricle; RAA, Right atrium area; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; S′, Peak systolic annular velocity; E′, wave velocity of tissue Doppler at the lateral tricuspid annulus; E, peak of pulse Doppler wave of early tricuspid flow velocity; A, peak of pulse Doppler wave of late tricuspid flow velocity; E/A, ratio between peak E and A waves; BW, body weight; VOmax maximum rate of oxygen consumption. Values are mean ± SEM. One Way-ANOVA, Ba/Deb vs Sh: αp < 0.05; ααp < 0.01; αααp < 0.001; Deb vs Ba: χp < 0.05; χχp < 0.01, χχχp < 0.001.
Figure 3Effect of pressure overload on RV hypertrophy and fibrosis. (A) Foxo transcription factor 1; (B) ratio of phosphorylated to total protein kinase B or AKT; (C) ratio of phosphorylated to total P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; (D) ratio of phosphorylated to total mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR); (E) ratio of phosphorylated to total glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β); (F) ratio of phosphorylated to total extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK); (G) Myostatin; (H) Muscle-specific RING finger protein-1 (MuRF1); (I) representative western blot lanes (for representative purposes the image was cropped and edited) representative membrane protein loading. n = 5 for each group. Values are mean ± SEM, One-way ANOVA. Ba/Deb vs Sh: αp < 0.05; ααp < 0.01; αααp < 0.001; Deb vs Ba: χp < 0.05; χχχp < 0.001.
Figure 4Effect of pressure overload on RV cardiomyocytes and calcium handling. (A) cardiomyocytes passive tension; (B) cardiomyocytes active tension; (C) myofilaments calcium sensitivity; (D) Hill-coefficient; (E) the rate of tension redevelopment (Ktr); Protein quantification of: (F) sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase 2a (SERCA2a); (G) ratio of phospholamban phosphorylated (p-PLB) to total (PLB); (H) ratio of SERCA2a to phospholamban; (I) sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX); (I) Junctophilin; (L) representative western blot lanes (for representative purposes the image was cropped and edited) representative membrane protein loading. n = 5 for each group. Values are mean ± SEM, One-way ANOVA. Ba/Deb vs Sh: αp < 0.05; ααp < 0.01; αααp < 0.001; Deb vs Ba: χp < 0.05; χχχp < 0.001.
Figure 5Effect of pressure overload on lung arteries thickness. (A–C) Pulmonary arterial thickness (D) representative images of histological lungs. Correlations between arterial wall thickness and: (E) maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2max); (F) ratio between: (E), peak of pulse Doppler wave of early mitral flow velocity and E′, wave velocity of tissue Doppler at the lateral mitral annulus; (E/e′) and (G) Indexed left ventricle area (LAAind). n = 8 for each group. Values are mean ± SEM, One-way ANOVA Ba/Deb vs Sh: αp < 0.05; ααp < 0.01; αααp < 0.001; Deb vs Ba: χp < 0.05; χχχp < 0.001.
Figure 6Experimental protocol design.