Aim: To investigate the influence of physical and psychosocial working conditions on the risk of disability pension among eldercare workers. Methods: After responding to a questionnaire in 2005, 4699 healthy female eldercare workers - free from chronic musculoskeletal pain, depressive symptoms and long-term sickness absence - were followed for 11 years in the Danish Register for Evaluation of Marginalization. Time-to-event analyses estimated the hazard ratio (HR) for disability pension from physical exertion during work, emotional demands, influence at work, role conflicts, and quality of leadership. Analyses were mutually adjusted for these work environmental factors as well as for age, education, smoking, leisure physical activity and body mass index. Results: During follow-up, 7.6% received disability pension. Physical exertion and emotional demands were associated with risk of disability pension, and both interacted with age. In age-stratified analyses, older eldercare workers (mean age 53 years at baseline) with moderate and high physical exertion (reference: low) were at increased risk with HRs of 1.51, 95% CI [1.06-2.15] and 2.54, 95% CI [1.34-4.83], respectively. Younger eldercare workers (mean age 36 years at baseline) with moderate emotional demands (reference: low) were at decreased risk with an HR of 0.57, 95% CI [0.37-0.85]. Conclusions: While a higher level of physical exertion is a risk factor for disability pension among older female eldercare workers, a moderate level of emotional demands is associated with lower risk among the younger workers. The age of the worker may be an important factor when providing recommendations for promoting a long and healthy working life.
Aim: To investigate the influence of physical and psychosocial working conditions on the risk of disability pension among eldercare workers. Methods: After responding to a questionnaire in 2005, 4699 healthy female eldercare workers - free from chronic musculoskeletal pain, depressive symptoms and long-term sickness absence - were followed for 11 years in the Danish Register for Evaluation of Marginalization. Time-to-event analyses estimated the hazard ratio (HR) for disability pension from physical exertion during work, emotional demands, influence at work, role conflicts, and quality of leadership. Analyses were mutually adjusted for these work environmental factors as well as for age, education, smoking, leisure physical activity and body mass index. Results: During follow-up, 7.6% received disability pension. Physical exertion and emotional demands were associated with risk of disability pension, and both interacted with age. In age-stratified analyses, older eldercare workers (mean age 53 years at baseline) with moderate and high physical exertion (reference: low) were at increased risk with HRs of 1.51, 95% CI [1.06-2.15] and 2.54, 95% CI [1.34-4.83], respectively. Younger eldercare workers (mean age 36 years at baseline) with moderate emotional demands (reference: low) were at decreased risk with an HR of 0.57, 95% CI [0.37-0.85]. Conclusions: While a higher level of physical exertion is a risk factor for disability pension among older female eldercare workers, a moderate level of emotional demands is associated with lower risk among the younger workers. The age of the worker may be an important factor when providing recommendations for promoting a long and healthy working life.
Entities:
Keywords:
Care worker; age; disability; nurses; physical workload; psychosocial work environment
Authors: Johanna Stengård; Marianna Virtanen; Constanze Leineweber; Hugo Westerlund; Hui-Xin Wang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Leticia Bergamin Januario; Kristina Karstad; Reiner Rugulies; Gunnar Bergström; Andreas Holtermann; David M Hallman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lars Louis Andersen; Jonas Vinstrup; Ebbe Villadsen; Kenneth Jay; Markus Due Jakobsen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Magnus Helgesson; Staffan Marklund; Klas Gustafsson; Gunnar Aronsson; Constanze Leineweber Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lars L Andersen; Sannie V Thorsen; Mona Larsen; Emil Sundstrup; Cécile Rl Boot; Reiner Rugulies Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Sebastian Venge Skovlund; Rúni Bláfoss; Sebastian Skals; Markus Due Jakobsen; Lars Louis Andersen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Lars Louis Andersen; Jacob Pedersen; Emil Sundstrup; Sannie Vester Thorsen; Reiner Rugulies Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.402