Literature DB >> 30813800

A prospective randomized open-label study of single injection versus continuous adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty.

N M Elkassabany1, L F Cai1, I Badiola1, B Kase1, J Liu2, C Hughes3, C L Israelite4, C L Nelson4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Adductor canal block (ACB) has emerged as an alternative to femoral nerve block (FNB) for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal duration of maintenance of the ACB is still questionable. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic benefits and physiotherapy (PT) outcomes of single-shot ACB to two different regimens of infusion of the continuous ACB, 24-hour and 48-hour infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, unblinded study. A total of 159 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III patients scheduled for primary TKA were randomized to one of three study groups. Three patients did not complete the study, leaving 156 patients for final analysis. Group A (n = 53) was the single-shot group (16 female patients and 37 male patients with a mean age of 63.9 years (sd 9.6)), group B (n = 51) was the 24-hour infusion group (22 female patients and 29 male patients with a mean age of 66.5 years (sd 8.5)), and group C (n = 52) was the 48-hour infusion group (18 female patients and 34 male patients with a mean age of 62.2 years (sd 8.7)). Pain scores, opioid requirements, PT test results, and patient-reported outcome instruments were compared between the three groups.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients reporting severe pain, defined as a pain score of between 7 and 10, on postoperative day number 2 (POD 2) were 21% for the single-shot group, 14% for the 24-hour block group, and 12% for the 48-hour block group (p = 0.05). Cumulative opioid requirements after 48 hours were similar between the groups. Functional outcomes were similar in all three groups in POD 1 and POD 2.
CONCLUSION: There was no clear benefit of the 24-hour or 48-hour infusions over the single-shot ACB for the primary endpoint of the study. Otherwise, there were marginal benefits for keeping the indwelling catheter for 48 hours in terms of reducing the number of patients with moderate pain and improving the quality of pain management. However, all three groups had similar opioid usage, length of hospital stay, and functional outcomes. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:340-347.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adductor canal block; Postoperative analgesia; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30813800     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B3.BJJ-2018-0852.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  11 in total

1.  Rigour will be important post-COVID-19.

Authors:  Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial.

Authors:  R Tak; A V Gurava Reddy; K Jhakotia; K Karumuri; S R Sankineani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-09-27

3.  Time for return to sport following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Magan; J Baawa-Ameyaw; B Kayani; G Radhakrishnan; F Ronca; F S Haddad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Analgesic Efficacy of Multiple Single-Shot Peripheral Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Short-Term Opioid Usage and Clinical Outcomes in a Suburban Hospital Setting.

Authors:  James Soler; Ned Sciortino; Sara Badaglialacqua; Craig Ryan; Greg Marchand
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2022-06-27

5.  Is continuous catheter adductor canal block better than single-shot canal adductor canal block in primary total knee arthroplasty?: A GRADE analysis of the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changjiao Sun; Xiaofei Zhang; Fei Song; Zhe Zhao; Ruiyong Du; Sha Wu; Qi Ma; Xu Cai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  An opioid-sparing protocol with intravenous parecoxib can effectively reduce morphine consumption after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Te-Feng Arthur Chou; Hsin-Yi Wang; Shang-Wen Tsai; Cheng-Fong Chen; Po-Kuei Wu; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  A A Magan; O Dunseath; P Armonis; A Fontalis; B Kayani; F S Haddad
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-07-01

8.  Effects of adductor canal block on pain management compared with epidural analgesia for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Lianzhou Zhu; Li Yang; Zhengkai Wang; Hanjuan Cui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Continuous adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with the single-shot adductor canal block?: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Rongguo Yu; Haiyang Wang; Youguang Zhuo; Dongxin Liu; Chunling Wu; Yiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Continuous versus single shot adductor canal block for postoperative pain relief after total knee arthroplasty: A protocol for randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yulin Tao; Qingjun Mao; Jixiang Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.