| Literature DB >> 30813491 |
Susumu Iiizumi1,2, Junya Ohtake3, Naoko Murakami4,5, Taku Kouro6, Mamoru Kawahara7, Fumiko Isoda8,9, Hiroshi Hamana10, Hiroyuki Kishi11, Norihiro Nakamura12, Tetsuro Sasada13.
Abstract
Neoantigens derived from tumor-specific genetic mutations might be suitable targets for cancer immunotherapy because of their high immunogenicity. In the current study, we evaluated the immunogenicity of 10 driver mutations that are frequently expressed in various cancers using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors (n = 25). Of the 10 synthetic peptides (27-mer) derived from these mutations, the six peptides from KRAS-G12D, KRAS-G12R, KRAS-G13D, NRAS-Q61R, PIK3CA-H1047R, and C-Kit-D816V induced T cell responses, suggesting that frequent driver mutations are not always less immunogenic. In particular, immune responses to PIK3CA-H1047R, C-Kit-D816V, KRAS-G13D, and NRAS-Q61R were observed in more than 10% of the donors. All six peptides induced human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II-restricted CD4⁺ T cell responses; notably, PIK3CA-H1047R contained at least two different CD4⁺ T cell epitopes restricted to different HLA class II alleles. In addition, PIK3CA-H1047R and C-Kit-D816V induced antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells as well, indicating that they might contain both HLA class I- and class II-restricted epitopes. Since the identified neoantigens might be shared by patients with various types of cancers and are not easily lost due to immune escape, they have the potential to be promising off-the-shelf cancer immunotherapy targets in patients with the corresponding mutations.Entities:
Keywords: MHC class II epitope; driver mutation; neoantigen
Year: 2019 PMID: 30813491 PMCID: PMC6406322 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
List of the synthetic peptides derived from driver mutations.
| Driver Mutation | Peptide Analyzed in This Study | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Mutation | Name | Peptide Sequence 1 |
| KRAS | (Wild-Type) | KRAS-WT | MTEYKLVVVGAGGVGKSALTIQLIQNH |
| G12D | KRAS-G12D | MTEYKLVVVGA | |
| G12V | KRAS-G12V | MTEYKLVVVGA | |
| G12C | KRAS-G12C | MTEYKLVVVGA | |
| G12R | KRAS-G12R | MTEYKLVVVGA | |
| G13D | KRAS-G13D | MTEYKLVVVGAG | |
| NRAS | (Wild-Type) | NRAS-WT | GETCLLDILDTAGQEEYSAMRDQYMRT |
| Q61K | NRAS-Q61K | GETCLLDILDTAG | |
| Q61R | NRAS-Q61R | GETCLLDILDTAG | |
| PIK3CA | (Wild-Type) | PIK3CA-WT1 | EALEYFMKQMNDAHHGGWTTKMDWIFH |
| H1047R | PIK3CA-H1047R | EALEYFMKQMNDA | |
| (Wild-Type) | PIK3CA-WT2 | KAISTRDPLSEITEQEKDFLWSHRHYC | |
| E545K | PIK3CA-E545K | KAISTRDPLSEIT | |
| C-Kit | (Wild-Type) | C-Kit-WT | GRITKICDFGLARDIKNDSNYVVKGNA |
| D816V | C-Kit-D816V | GRITKICDFGLAR | |
1 Mutated position is bold and underlined.
Summary of immunogenicity of the synthetic peptides derived from driver mutations.
| Donor No. | Mix-1 1 | Mix-2 1 | Mix-3 1 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRAS- | NRAS- | PIK3CA- | KRAS- | NRAS- | PIK3CA- | KRAS- | KRAS- | KRAS- | C-Kit | ||||
| 1 | - | CD4 | - | ||||||||||
| 2 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 3 | CD4 2 | - | - | ||||||||||
| 4 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 5 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 6 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 7 | CD4 | - | - | CD4 | CD8 3 | - | CD4 | - | CD4 | - | - | - | CD4 |
| 8 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 9 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 10 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 11 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 12 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 13 | - | CD8 | - | ||||||||||
| 14 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 15 | - | CD8 | - | ||||||||||
| 16 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 17 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 18 | CD4 | - | - | CD4 | - | CD4 | - | - | CD4 | - | |||
| 19 | - | - | - | ||||||||||
| 20 | - | - | CD4 | - | - | - | CD4 | ||||||
| 21 | - | - | CD4 | - | - | CD4 | - | ||||||
| 22 | - | CD4 | - | CD4 | - | CD4 | - | CD4 | - | CD4 | |||
| 23 | CD4 | - | - | CD4 | - | - | |||||||
| 24 | CD4/8 | - | - | CD4/8 | CD4 | - | CD4 | - | CD4/8 | CD4 | - | CD4 | CD8 |
| 25 | CD4 | - | - | - | CD4 | ||||||||
| Frequency | 16.7% | 12.5% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 12.0% | 20.0% |
1 Mix-1—KRAS-G12C, NRAS-Q61R, and PIK3CA-H1047R; Mix-2—KRAS-G12V, NRAS-Q61R, and PIK3CA-E545K; Mix-3—KRAS-G12D, KRAS-G12R, KRAS-G13D, and C-Kit-D816V. 2 Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells detected by intracellular interferon-gamma (IFNγ) staining. 3 Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells detected by intracellular IFNγ staining. (-)—not detected; (blank)—not tested.
Figure 1Representative flow cytometry profile of IFNγ production in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (a) Mix-3-stimulated CD4+ T cells (donor No. 21) were first examined for responses to the Mix-3, and then to each peptide constituent of the Mix-3. The percentages of IFNγ positive cells in CD4+ T cells are shown. (b) Mix-1-stimulated CD8+ T cells (donor No. 24) were first examined for responses to the Mix-1, and then to each peptide constituent of the Mix-1. The percentages of IFNγ positive cells in CD8+ T cells are shown.
Figure 2Determination of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II restriction of neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells by blocking assay. Neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells were stimulated without or with synthetic peptides (mutated or corresponding wild-type peptides) in the absence or presence of anti-HLA Class II antibody (anti-HLA-DP, -DQ, or -DR) to determine HLA class II restriction. Amounts of IFNγ secreted in the culture supernatant (closed bar) were determined by ELISA ((a) KRAS-G12R-specific cells from donor No. 22; (b) KRAS-G13D-specific cells from donor No. 18; and (e) PIK3CA-H1047R-specific cells from donor No. 24). The percentages of IFNγ positive cells in CD4+ T cells (open bar) were determined by flow cytometry ((c) KRAS-G13D-specific cells from donor No. 24; (d) PIK3CA-H1047R-specific cells from donor No. 18; (f) PIK3CA-H1047R-specific cells from donor No. 7; (g) C-Kit-D816V-specific cells from donor No. 25; and (h) C-Kit-D816V-specific cells derived from donor No. 7).
Figure 3Determination of HLA class II restriction of neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells by stimulation with the peptides presented by HLA class II-matched allogeneic lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) as antigen presenting cells (APCs). HLA Class II-matched allogeneic LCLs were used as APCs to stimulate neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells without (open bar) or with (closed bar) mutated synthetic peptides. HLA class II alleles of donors and matched LCLs are shown in bold. Amounts of IFNγ secreted in the culture supernatant by ELISA ((a) KRAS-G12R-specific cells from donor No. 22; (b) KRAS-G13D-specific cells derived donor No. 18; (c) KRAS-G13D-specific cells from donor No. 24; and (d) PIK3CA-H1047R-specific cells from donor No. 24) or percentages of IFNγ positive cells in CD4+ T cells by flow cytometry ((e) C-Kit-D816V-specific cells from donor No. 25) are shown.
Figure 4Epitope mapping of neoantigens. Overlapping peptides (12- to 15-mer) derived from PIK3CA-H1047R or C-Kit-D816V were tested for IFNγ production in CD4+ T cells specific to PIK3CA-H1047R or C-Kit-D816V, respectively. The percentages of IFNγ positive cells in neoantigen-specific CD4+ T cells were determined by flow cytometry after stimulation with each overlapping peptide, presented by autologous DCs as APCs. The sequences of overlapping peptides and percentages of IFNγ positive cells in CD4+ T cells are shown. (a) PIK3CA-H1047R-specific CD4+ T cells from donor No. 18; (b) PIK3CA-H1047R-specific CD4+ T cells from donor No. 24; and (c) C-Kit-D816V-specific CD4+ T cells from donor No. 25.
T cell receptor (TCR) sequences of T cell clones specific to PIK3CA-H1047R and C-Kit-D816V.
| Antigen | TCR | Variable (V) | Joining (J) | Diversity (D) | CDR3 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-Kit- | TRA | TRAV1-1 | TRAJ39 | - | CAVRDNAGNMLTF |
| TRB | TRBV19 | TRBJ1-2 | TRBD2 | CASSIPNLGYGYTF | |
| PIK3CA- | TRA | TRAV23/DV6 | TRAJ43 | - | CAASGSYNNNDMRF |
| TRB | TRBV6-5 | TRBJ2-2 | TRBD1 | CASSYASPGTGYSGELFF |
1 CDR3, complementarity–determining region 3.