| Literature DB >> 30813289 |
Kathrin Laura Kohnen-Johannsen1, Oliver Kayser2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: biosynthesis; biotechnological production; calystegine; chemistry; cocaine; pharmacology; scopolamine; tropane alkaloids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30813289 PMCID: PMC6412926 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24040796
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of the tropane skeleton (green box) and the three major groups of TAs derived from this skeleton.
Figure 2Comparison of the chemical structures of acetylcholine, muscarine and scopolamine. Scopolamine is protonated in the body due to the physiological pH and is present as a quaternary ammonium salt.
Figure 3Joint steps of the early TA biosynthesis; ACD = arginine decarboxylase; AIH = agmatine deiminase; OCD = ornithine decarboxylase; CPA = N-carbamoylputrescine amidase; PMT = putrescine N-methyltransferase; SPDS = spermidine synthase; SMS = spermine synthase; MPO = N-methylputrescine oxidase; * = spontaneous cyclization.
Figure 4Scopolamine biosynthesis, starting with the N-methylpyrrolinium cation; PYKS = polyketide synthase; CYP82M3 = cytochrome P450 enzyme; TR-I/II = tropinone reductase I/II; littorine synthase (sequence not known); littorine mutase/monooxygenase (CYP80F1); (* 1) = proposed mechanism of littorine rearrangement; H6H = hyoscyamine 6β-hydroxylase.
Figure 5Cocaine biosynthesis, starting with the intermediate N-methyl-Δ1-pyrrolinium cation; only less information regarding the enzymatically involvement is proven. The iminium cation reacts with two acetyl-CoA moieties to an intermediate that cyclizes in an intramolecular Mannich reaction. After hydrolysis, methylation and reduction methylecgonine is formed. The cocaine synthase catalyses the last step in the pathway: the condensation of methylecgonine with benzoyl-CoA.
Overview of TA concentrations in engineered and untreated hairy cultures from different plants. TAs content in leaves of regenerated plants; n.d. = not determined, DW = dry weight.
| Plant | Overexpression of | Amount | Citation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyoscyamine | Scopolamine | |||
|
| - | 0.371 ± 0.013% DW | 0.024 ± 0.010% DW | Kamada et al., 1986 [ |
|
| 0.02% *) | 0.45% *) | Hashimoto et al., 1993b [ | |
|
| 2.1 + 0.2 mg g−1 DW | n.d. | Falk and Doran, 1996 [ | |
|
| 0.31 mg g−1 DW | 0.27 mg g−1 DW | Vakili et al., 2012 [ | |
|
|
| 1.6 mg g−1 DW | 5.3 mg g−1 DW | Jaremicz et al., 2014 [ |
|
| n.d. | 411 mg L−1 | Zhang et al., 2004 [ | |
|
|
| 0.789 ± 0.078 mg g−1 DW | 0.070 ± 0.003 mg g−1 DW | Kai et al., 2012 [ |
|
| 2.479 ± 0.432 mg g−1 DW | 0.023 ± 0.004 mg g−1 DW | ||
|
| 2.286 ± 0.46 mg g−1 DW | 0.072 ± 0.018 mg g−1 DW | ||
|
|
| 0.35 ± 0.07 mg g−1 DW | 1.05 mg g−1 DW | Cardillo et al., 2010 [ |
|
|
| 287.7 mg L−1 | 14.41 mg L−1 | Jouhikainen et al., 1999 [ |
|
|
| no increase observed | Moyano et al., 2002 [ | |
|
| n.d. | 24.93 mg g−1 DW | Palazón et al., 2003 [ | |
*) TAs content in leaves of regenerated plants **) chromium treatment ***) B. candida hairy roots grown in a special bioreactor.