Jennifer Barsky Reese1,2, Stephen J Lepore1,2, Mary B Daly3, Elizabeth Handorf1, Kristen A Sorice1, Laura S Porter4, James A Tulsky5, Mary Catherine Beach6. 1. Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 5. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sexual concerns are often unaddressed for breast cancer patients; one reason is inadequate clinician training. We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and potential benefits of a novel intervention, improving Sexual Health and Augmenting Relationships through Education (iSHARE) for breast cancer clinicians. METHODS: Clinicians received training in communicating about sexual concerns with breast cancer patients. Intervention feasibility and acceptability were measured through enrollment/participation and postintervention program evaluations, respectively. Intervention effects were assessed through (1) clinician self-reported beliefs about sexual health communication, assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1- or 6-month follow-up, (2) clinical communication coded from audio recorded, transcribed clinic encounters at preintervention or postintervention, and (3) patient satisfaction with clinical care, reported immediately after the clinic visit. Patients also reported sociodemographic characteristics and level of sexual concerns. RESULTS: Seven breast cancer clinicians enrolled (88% participation), completed the intervention, and were audio recorded in clinic encounters with 134 breast cancer outpatients (67 each at preintervention or postintervention). Program evaluations supported intervention acceptability. Effect sizes suggest iSHARE increased clinicians' self-efficacy (d = 0.27) and outcome expectancies for communicating about sexual concerns (d = 0.69) and reduced communication barriers (d = -0.14). Clinicians' sexual health communication behaviors increased from baseline to postintervention, including for raising the topic (28% vs 48%), asking questions (33% vs 45%), and offering information (18% vs 24%). Neither patient satisfaction nor duration of sexual health communication changed (mean duration less than 1 minute at both time points). CONCLUSIONS: The iSHARE intervention was feasible and well received by clinicians and may change breast cancer clinicians' beliefs and communication behaviors regarding sexual health.
OBJECTIVE: Sexual concerns are often unaddressed for breast cancerpatients; one reason is inadequate clinician training. We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and potential benefits of a novel intervention, improving Sexual Health and Augmenting Relationships through Education (iSHARE) for breast cancer clinicians. METHODS: Clinicians received training in communicating about sexual concerns with breast cancerpatients. Intervention feasibility and acceptability were measured through enrollment/participation and postintervention program evaluations, respectively. Intervention effects were assessed through (1) clinician self-reported beliefs about sexual health communication, assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1- or 6-month follow-up, (2) clinical communication coded from audio recorded, transcribed clinic encounters at preintervention or postintervention, and (3) patient satisfaction with clinical care, reported immediately after the clinic visit. Patients also reported sociodemographic characteristics and level of sexual concerns. RESULTS: Seven breast cancer clinicians enrolled (88% participation), completed the intervention, and were audio recorded in clinic encounters with 134 breast cancer outpatients (67 each at preintervention or postintervention). Program evaluations supported intervention acceptability. Effect sizes suggest iSHARE increased clinicians' self-efficacy (d = 0.27) and outcome expectancies for communicating about sexual concerns (d = 0.69) and reduced communication barriers (d = -0.14). Clinicians' sexual health communication behaviors increased from baseline to postintervention, including for raising the topic (28% vs 48%), asking questions (33% vs 45%), and offering information (18% vs 24%). Neither patient satisfaction nor duration of sexual health communication changed (mean duration less than 1 minute at both time points). CONCLUSIONS: The iSHARE intervention was feasible and well received by clinicians and may change breast cancer clinicians' beliefs and communication behaviors regarding sexual health.
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen A Sorice; Lauren A Zimmaro; Stephen J Lepore; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2020-04-04
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Lauren A Zimmaro; Sharon L Bober; Kristen Sorice; Elizabeth Handorf; Elaine Wittenberg; Areej El-Jawahri; Mary Catherine Beach; Antonio C Wolff; Mary B Daly; Brynna Izquierdo; Stephen J Lepore Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Jennifer B Reese; Kristen A Sorice; Whitney Pollard; Elizabeth Handorf; Mary C Beach; Mary B Daly; Laura S Porter; James A Tulsky; Stephen J Lepore Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Areej El-Jawahri; Kristen Sorice; Christina Cruz; Sharon L Bober; Mary B Daly; Lauren A Zimmaro; Mary Catherine Beach; Elaine Wittenberg; Antonio C Wolff; Elizabeth Handorf; Stephen J Lepore Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Victoria Huynh; Sudheer Vemuru; Karen Hampanda; Jessica Pettigrew; Marcella Fasano; Helen L Coons; Kristin E Rojas; Anosheh Afghahi; Gretchen Ahrendt; Simon Kim; Dan D Matlock; Sarah E Tevis Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 4.339