| Literature DB >> 30810784 |
Alice Emasu1, Bonnie Ruder2, L Lewis Wall3,4, Alphonsus Matovu5, Godfrey Alia6, Justus Kafunjo Barageine7,8.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Genitourinary fistulas (usually arising following prolonged obstructed labor) are particularly devastating for women in low-income counties. Surgical repair is often difficult and delayed. While much attention has been devoted to technical surgical issues, the challenges of returning to normal personal, family, and community life after surgical treatment have received less scrutiny from researchers. We surveyed young Ugandan women recovering from genitourinary fistula surgery to assess their social reintegration needs following surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Genitourinary fistula; Obstetric fistula; Social reintegration; Uganda; Vesicovaginal fistula; Young women
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30810784 PMCID: PMC6586689 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03896-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Urogynecol J ISSN: 0937-3462 Impact factor: 2.894
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants
| Variable | Number (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Mean age: 21.6 (± 2.6), range: 14–24 years | 61 (100) |
| Age category | ||
| • >18 years | 6 (9.8) | |
| • 18–24 years | 55 (91.2) | |
| Education | ||
| • None | 2 (3.3) | |
| • Partial or complete primary school | 49 (80.3 | |
| • Secondary (O level) | 10 (16.4) | |
| Literate in local language | ||
| • Yes | 31 (50.8) | |
| • No | 30 (49.2) | |
| Literate in English | ||
| • Yes | 24 (39.3) | |
| • No | 37 (60.7) | |
| Religion | ||
| • Roman Catholic | 23 (37.7) | |
| • Protestant Christian | 22 (36.1) | |
| • Charismatic/Pentecostal Christian | 8 (13.1) | |
| • Muslim | 8 (13.1) | |
| Current marital status | ||
| • Never married | 10 (16.4) | |
| • Currently married | 20 (32.8) | |
| • Cohabiting with a partner | 30 (49.2) | |
| • Data missing | 1 (1.6) | |
| Type of marriage (among those currently married, | ||
| • Customary marriage with bridewealth paymentsa | 17 (85.0) | |
| • Islamic marriage | 3 (15.0) | |
| Polygamous marriage (among those currently married, | ||
| • Yes | 6 (30.0) | |
| • No | 13 (65.0) | |
| • Data missing | 1 (5.0) | |
| Number of wives (among polygamous marriages, | ||
| • Two | 4 (66.7) | |
| • Three | 1 (16.7) | |
| • Four | 1 (16.7) | |
| Change in marital status due to fistula (among those currently married or cohabiting) | ||
| • Yes | 31 (62.0) | |
| • No | 19 (38.0) | |
aMarriage payments are commonly referred to as dowry but is actually a payment made by the family of the groom to the family of the bride. In anthropology this is more properly called bridewealth, and we kept this more technical term for this reason
Fistula history
| Variable | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Age at which fistula occurred: 18.8 (± 3.8), range 14–24 years | 61 (100) |
| Duration of fistula at the time of repair | |
| • < 1 year | 26 (42.6) |
| • 1–5 years | 23 (37.7) |
| • > 5 years | 9 (14.8) |
| • Missing data | 3 (4.9) |
| Perceived cause of fistula | |
| • Obstetric trauma | 53 (86.9) |
| • Other forms of trauma, including accidents and surgical injury | 6 (9.8) |
| • Unspecified | 2 (3.3) |
| Pregnancy in which obstetric fistula occurred ( | |
| • First | 28 (52.8) |
| • Second | 14 (26.4) |
| • Third | 4 (7.6) |
| • Fourth or higher | 7 (13.2) |
| Reported duration of labor (for cases of obstetric fistula) 2.6 (± 1.5) days | |
| Outcome of delivery leading to fistula ( | |
| • Stillbirth | 26 (49.1) |
| • Neonatal death | 11 (20.8) |
| • Living child | 16 (30.2) |
| Type of delivery at pregnancy leading to fistula ( | |
| • Spontaneous vaginal delivery | 8 (15.1) |
| • Operative vaginal delivery | 9 (20.8) |
| • Cesarean delivery | 36 (67.9) |
| Location of delivery leading to fistula ( | |
| • Home delivery | 4 (7.6) |
| • Private clinic | 3 (5.7) |
| • Health center (level 2 or 3)a | 9 (17.0) |
| • Health center (level 4, district hospital) | 16 (30.2) |
| • Regional referral hospital | 20 (37.7) |
| • Private hospital | 1 (1.9) |
aHealth centre 2 is a parish-level, basic primary health facility. Health center 3 is a subcounty basic primary health facility providing slightly more advanced care. Both are equipped for basic deliveries but neither provide comprehensive emergency obstetric care
Health concerns following fistula development
| Variable | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Type of help sought because of fistula (more than 1 answer possible) | |
| • Traditional healers | 11 (18.0) |
| • Prayer from spiritual healers (including churches) | 7 (11.5) |
| • Medical therapy (before surgical intervention) | 60 (98.4) |
| • Family remedies | 3 (4.9) |
| • Herbal medicine | 2 (3.3) |
| Ultimate outcome of fistula treatment | |
| • Unsuccessful | 4 (6.6) |
| • Successful at initial treatment | 51 (83.6) |
| • Successful after multiple surgeries | 6 (9.8) |
| Number of fistula surgeries | |
| • 1 | 53 (86.9) |
| • 2 | 4 (6.6) |
| • 3 | 3 (4.9) |
| • ≥4 | 1 (1.6) |
| Pregnancy since fistula | |
| • Yes | 17 (27.8) |
| • No | 44 (71.2) |
| Outcome of pregnancy since fistula ( | |
| • Miscarriage | 4 (23.5) |
| • Live birth | 12 (70.6) |
| • Pregnant at the time of interview | 1 (5.9) |
| Ongoing health concerns after fistula | |
| • Yes | 28 (45.9) |
| • No | 33 (54.1) |
| Perceived needs to help manage ongoing health conditions/concerns ( | |
| • Financial support | 19 (67.9) |
| • Education or counseling | 7 (25.0) |
| • Family counseling | 1 (3.6) |
| • Medical treatment | 10 (35.7) |
Psychosocial needs related to fistula care
| Variable | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Fearful at time of hospital discharge | |
| • Yes | 58 (95.0) |
| • No | 3 (5.0) |
| Plans for residence after hospital discharge | |
| • Parents | 35 (57.4) |
| • Partner | 15 (24.6) |
| • Guardian | 2 (3.3) |
| • Other family members | 2 (3.3) |
| • Confused or uncertain about plans | 2 (3.3) |
| • Missing data | 2 (3.3) |
| Presence of factors limiting return to normal life | |
| • Yes | 59 (96.7) |
| • No | 2 (3.3) |
| Partner’s reaction (for those with a partner; | |
| • Abandoned, separated, or dismissed by partner | 25 (47.2) |
| • Partner emotionally or physically abusive | 12 (22.6) |
| • Partner brought in another wife | 9 (17.0) |
| • Partner unsupportive, but did not separate or abandon | 9 (17.0) |
| • Partner remained engaged and supportive | 8 (15.1) |
| • Partner unfaithful after fistula | 6 (11.3) |
| Plans for further education after fistula | |
| • Yes | 51 (83.6) |
| • No | 10 (16.4) |
| Those who visited the patient while under treatment (more than 1 answer possible) | |
| • Friends, neighbors, and community members | 21 (34.4) |
| • Parents | 13 (21.3) |
| • Church members and religious leaders | 7 (11.5) |
| • Siblings and other relatives | 40 (65.6) |
| • In-laws | 9 (14.8) |
| • Members of TERREWODE | 7 (11.5) |
| • Husband/partner/boyfriend | 5 (8.2) |
| • Nurse | 1 (1.6) |
| • No one | 12 (19.7) |
Sexual and reproductive needs after fistula
| Variable | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Discussed family planning after fistula surgery | |
| • Yes | 40 (65.6) |
| • No | 21 (34.4) |
| Wish to have more children | |
| • Yes | 52 (85.3) |
| • No | 9 (14.8) |
| Currently using family planning method | |
| • Yes | 16 (26.2) |
| • No | 45 (73.8) |
| Would like to use family planning to space or limit children | |
| • No | 24 (39.3) |
| • Yes | 29 (47.5) |
| • Not applicable | 5 (8.2) |
| • Missing data | 3 (4.9) |
| Currently in an intimate relationship | |
| • Yes | 38 (62.3) |
| • No | 23 (37.7) |
| Would like to be in an intimate relationship ( | |
| • Yes | 7 (30.4) |
| • No | 16 (69.6) |
| Intimate partner the same as before fistula occurrence | |
| • Yes | 27 (71.1) |
| • No | 11 (29.7) |
| Difficulties with sexual intercourse after fistula | |
| • No | 31 (50.8) |
| • Painful | 8 (14.8) |
| • Afraid or fearful of intercourse | 4 (6.6) |
| • Loss of sexual interest | 9 (14.8) |
| • Not applicable | 9 (14.8) |
Socioeconomic status and needs related to fistula
| Variable | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Employed before fistula | |
| • Yes | 19 (31.2) |
| • No | 41 (68.9) |
| Type of job before fistula | |
| • Agriculture or quarrying | 3 (15.8) |
| • Hair salon | 1 (5.3) |
| • Housekeeper or house cleaner | 2 (10.5) |
| • Self-employed | 2 (10.5) |
| • Petty trading—selling groundnuts, charcoal, etc. | 4 (21.1) |
| • Shop assistant | 4 (21.1) |
| • Missing/incomplete | 3 (15.8) |
| How fistula affected employment | |
| • Lost business | 8 (57.9) |
| • Lost job | 4 (21.1) |
| • Continued working | 2 (10.5) |
| • Stopped working/too weak | 6 (31.6) |
| Currently employed for pay | |
| • Yes | 14 (23.0) |
| • No | 43 (70.5) |
| • Missing data | 4 (6.6) |
| Current weekly income if employed ( | |
| • < 5000 Ugandan shillings | 2 (14.3) |
| • 5000–10,000 Ugandan shillings | 5 (25.7) |
| • 11,000–20,000 Ugandan shillings | 2 (14.3) |
| • 21,000–30,000 Ugandan shillings | 1 (7.1) |
| • 31,000–40,000 Ugandan shillings | 1 (7.1) |
| • 41,000–50,000 Ugandan shillings | 1 (7.1) |
| • Missing data | 2 (14.3) |
| Borrowed money or used savings to cover household costs in past month | |
| • Yes | 31 (50.8) |
| • No | 29 (47.5) |
| • Missing data/incomplete | 1 (1.6) |
| Experienced economic abuse before fistula | |
| • Yes | 30 (49.2) |
| • No | 31 (50.8) |
| Experienced economic abuse after fistula | |
| • Yes | 39 (65.0) |
| • No | 20 (33.3) |
| • Missing data | 1 (1.7) |