Literature DB >> 30810740

Nationwide Introduction of Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery for Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer and Its Association With Severe Complications.

Siv Lykke Jørgensen1,2,3, Ole Mogensen3,4, Chunsen Wu1,3, Ken Lund5,6, Maria Iachina5,6, Malene Korsholm1,2,3,7, Pernille Tine Jensen1,3.   

Abstract

Importance: Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery (MILS) for endometrial cancer reduces surgical morbidity compared with a total abdominal hysterectomy. However, only a minority of women with early-stage endometrial cancer undergo MILS. Objective: To evaluate the association between the Danish nationwide introduction of minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) and severe complications in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this nationwide prospective cohort study of 5654 women with early-stage endometrial cancer who had undergone surgery during the period from January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2015, data from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database were linked with national registers on socioeconomic status, deaths, hospital diagnoses, and hospital treatments. The women were divided into 2 groups; group 1 underwent surgery before the introduction of MIRS in their region, and group 2 underwent surgery after the introduction of MIRS. Women with an unknown disease stage, an unknown association with MIRS implementation, unknown histologic findings, sarcoma, or synchronous cancer were excluded, as were women who underwent vaginal or an unknown surgical type of hysterectomy. Statistical analysis was conducted from February 2, 2017, to May 4, 2018. Exposure: Minimally invasive robotic surgery, MILS, or total abdominal hysterectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severe complications were dichotomized and encompassed death within 30 days after surgery and intraoperative and postoperative complications diagnosed within 90 days after surgery.
Results: A total of 3091 women (mean [SD] age, 67 [10] years) were allocated to group 1, and a total of 2563 women (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years) were allocated to group 2. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, the odds of severe complications were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-1.74). The proportion of women undergoing MILS was 14.1% (n = 436) in group 1 and 22.2% in group 2 (n = 569). The proportion of women undergoing MIRS in group 2 was 50.0% (n = 1282). In group 2, multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that a total abdominal hysterectomy was associated with increased odds of severe complications compared with MILS (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.80-3.70) and MIRS (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 2.52-5.93). No difference was found for MILS compared with MIRS (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.99-2.27). Conclusions and Relevance: The national introduction of MIRS changed the surgical approach for early-stage endometrial cancer from open surgery to minimally invasive surgery. This change in surgical approach was associated with a significantly reduced risk of severe complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30810740      PMCID: PMC6584253          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes and technical features using da Vinci Si and Xi robotic platforms for early stages of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Giannini; Elisa Malacarne; Claudia Sergiampietri; Paolo Mannella; Alessandra Perutelli; Vito Cela; Massimo Stomati; Franca Melfi; Tommaso Simoncini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-05-23

2.  The effect of surgical approach on the outcomes and prognosis of high-risk histologic endometrioid carcinomas.

Authors:  Zhihong Han; Zhong Zheng; Kai Tao; Yanping Yu; Jinping Wu; Xiaofei Tian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

3.  Trends in Hysterectomy Incidence Rates During 2000-2015 in Denmark: Shifting from Abdominal to Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Kathrine Dyhr Lycke; Johnny Kahlert; Rikke Damgaard; Ole Mogensen; Anne Hammer
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Robotic vs. open surgery in obese women with low-grade endometrial cancer: comparison of costs and quality of life measures.

Authors:  Adi Sofer; Racheli Magnezi; Ram Eitan; Oded Raban; Orna Tal; Noam Smorgic; Zvi Vaknin
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2020-11-02

5.  Care as Usual: An Acceptable Strategy to Apply During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a French Tertiary Gynecologic Oncology Department.

Authors:  Guillaume Blache; Houssein El Hajj; Camille Jauffret; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Laura Sabiani; Julien Barrou; Isabelle Masquin; Jérémy Le Saout; Djamel Mokart; Marion Faucher; Eric Lambaudie
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study.

Authors:  Pluvio J Coronado; Agnieszka Rychlik; Laura Baquedano; Virginia García-Pineda; Maria A Martínez-Maestre; Denis Querleu; Ignacio Zapardiel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.

Authors:  Kiran H Clair; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Determinants of Surgical Approach and Survival Among Women with Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kristin Bixel; David A Barrington; Monica H Vetter; Adrian A Suarez; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Surgical trends, outcomes and disparities in minimal invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in England: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Esther L Moss; George Morgan; Antony P Martin; Panos Sarhanis; Thomas Ind
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Nationwide Comparison of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes in Endometrial Cancer Patients Undergoing Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Eoh; Eun-Ji Nam; Sang-Wun Kim; Minkyung Shin; Stella J-H Kim; Jung-Ae Kim; Yong-Tae Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.679

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.