Literature DB >> 30810466

Correlation of a Commercial Genomic Risk Classifier with Histological Patterns in Prostate Cancer.

Nancy Y Greenland1, Li Zhang2,3, Janet E Cowan4, Peter R Carroll4, Bradley A Stohr1, Jeffry P Simko1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: RNA expression based molecular testing has the potential to improve clinical decision making as an adjunct to histopathological interpretation of prostate cancer biopsies. The GPS (Oncotype Dx Genomic Prostate Score®) assay has been proposed as a predictor of more severe pathology at prostatectomy but its true clinical value is uncertain. We hypothesized that some of the predictive usefulness of this assay relates to its correlation with histopathological features which are apparent but not typically reported on prostate biopsies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single center cohort we determined an RNA based GPS of prostate biopsies. We retrospectively reviewed the histopathological features of biopsy cores with the score and assessed tumor length, Gleason pattern 4 amount and type, and stromal reaction type. Associations between the GPS and histopathological features were assessed by linear mixed models.
RESULTS: From May 2013 to August 2015 a GPS was determined in 319 biopsies in a total of 296 patients. Of the types of Gleason pattern 4 the expansile cribriform, simple cribriform, poorly formed and fused patterns were associated with a higher GPS. The expansile cribriform pattern had the strongest association. The glomerulation pattern was associated with a lower GPS and an increasing stromal reaction also positively correlated with the GPS. A model incorporating these pathological features accounted for 36.9% of the variation in the score.
CONCLUSIONS: The stromal reaction and the type of Gleason pattern 4 are histopathological features which are not typically reported for prostate biopsies but they correlate with the GPS. These data suggest that more detailed analysis of prostate histopathology might substitute for some of the information gained from this molecular diagnostic assay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; genomics; pathology; prostatic neoplasms; risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30810466     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Molecular risk classifier score and biochemical recurrence risk are associated with cribriform pattern type in Gleason 3+4=7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nancy Y Greenland; Matthew R Cooperberg; Anthony C Wong; Emily Chan; Peter R Carroll; Jeffry P Simko; Bradley A Stohr
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-01

Review 2.  Cribriform Prostate Cancer: Clinical Pathologic and Molecular Considerations.

Authors:  Amanda B Hesterberg; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.633

3.  Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading.

Authors:  Geert J L H van Leenders; Esther I Verhoef; Eva Hollemans
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 4.  Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate as a Cause of Prostate Cancer Metastasis: A Molecular Portrait.

Authors:  Helen Pantazopoulos; Mame-Kany Diop; Andrée-Anne Grosset; Frédérique Rouleau-Gagné; Afnan Al-Saleh; Teodora Boblea; Dominique Trudel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies.

Authors:  L Lucia Rijstenberg; Tim Hansum; Charlotte F Kweldam; Intan P Kümmerlin; Sebastiaan Remmers; Monique J Roobol; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.778

6.  Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Simone Flammia; Marco Frisenda; Martina Maggi; Fabio Massimo Magliocca; Antonio Ciardi; Valeria Panebianco; Ettore De Berardinis; Stefano Salciccia; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Alessandro Gentilucci; Francesco Del Giudice; Gian Maria Busetto; Michele Gallucci; Alessandro Sciarra
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.