| Literature DB >> 30809548 |
Věra Žídková1,2, Marie Nakládalová1, Ladislav Štěpánek1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Occupational carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) due to upper extremity overuse has in recent years been the most commonly recognized occupational disease in the Czech Republic and its prevalence has steadily increased. This pilot observation aimed to assess the effects of exercise techniques and oral enzyme therapy in automotive plant workers with early CTS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The observation comprised automotive plant assembly line workers in whom nerve conduction study revealed incipient CTS. The subjects were divided into three groups: a group practicing exercise techniques (exercising; N=15), a group receiving oral enzyme therapy (N=16), and a group of controls (N=14). Subjects in the control group were only observed without any specific intervention, which is a common procedure in incipient CTS. Throughout 9-week observation, the workers did their jobs. Prior to and after that period, the workers' CTS-related symptoms were ascertained through structured interviews with a physician and the following median nerve parameters were measured: sensory conduction velocity (SCV) and distal motor latency (DML).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30809548 PMCID: PMC6364104 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8720493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Sample composition by age, gender, and initial findings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| 15 | 12 (80.0%) | 3 (20.0%) | 35 | 24 | 54 | 22 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 0 |
|
| 16 | 10 (62.5%) | 6 (37.5%) | 31 | 22 | 59 | 24 | 26 | 17 | 17 | 8 |
|
| 14 | 12 (85.7%) | 2 (14.3%) | 35 | 24 | 60 | 13 | 18 | 15 | 6 | 3 |
ME: median, NCS: nerve conduction study, SCV: sensory conduction velocity, DML: distal motor latency.
Assessment of symptoms.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
| pains | 0–5/0–5 | ||
| tingling, burning | 0–5/0–5 | |||
| other | 0–5/0–5 | |||
|
| ||||
|
| never | 0 | ||
| during work | 1 | |||
| at rest | 1 | |||
| at night | 1 | |||
|
| ||||
|
| never | 0 | ||
| less than 10′ | 1 | |||
| 10–60′ | 2 | |||
| more than 60′ | 3 | |||
| Permanently | 4 | |||
|
| ||||
|
| never | 0 | ||
| 1–2x | 1 | |||
| 3–5x | 2 | |||
| more than 5x | 3 | |||
| permanently | 4 | |||
|
| ||||
|
| never | 0 | ||
| 1–2x | 1 | |||
| 3–5x | 2 | |||
| more than 5x | 3 | |||
| permanently | 4 | |||
|
| ||||
|
| yes/no | 1/0 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| Phalen/Tinel/DelPino | 1/1/1 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
Figure 1Three exercise techniques performed by the exercise group.
Development in symptoms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
|
| initial | 9.6±4.8 | 7 | 7 | 9.8 | p<0.001 |
| final | 2.0±2.8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ||
|
| ||||||
|
| initial | 11.5±7.6 | 8 | 7 | 14.8 | p<0.001 |
| final | 5.5±6.5 | 6 | 0 | 8 | ||
|
| ||||||
|
| initial | 11.7±4.9 | 9 | 8 | 14.5 | p=0.161 |
| final | 10.9±5.7 | 10 | 8 | 13.5 | ||
SD: standard deviation, ME: median.
Assessment of the development in sensory conduction of the median nerve.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
|
| initial | 47.14±1.53 | 46.32 | 47.95 | p<0.001 |
| final | 53.11±7.57 | 49.07 | 57.14 | ||
|
| |||||
|
| initial | 45.32±3.03 | 43.76 | 46.88 | p<0.001 |
| final | 54.75±8.44 | 50.41 | 59.09 | ||
|
| |||||
|
| initial | 45.70±2.64 | 44.24 | 47.16 | p=0.660 |
| final | 46.38±1.94 | 45.31 | 47.45 | ||
NCS: nerve conduction study, SCV: sensory conduction velocity, SD: standard deviation.
Assessment of the development in motor conduction of the median nerve.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
|
| initial | 4.24±0.09 | 4.13 | 4.35 | |
| final | 4.14±0.07 | 4.06 | 4.22 | ||
|
| |||||
|
| initial | 4.44±0.28 | 4.3 | 4.58 | p=0.008 |
| final | 4.10±0.41 | 3.88 | 4.33 | ||
|
| |||||
|
| initial | 4.45±0.21 | 4.23 | 4.67 | |
| final | 4.22±0.28 | 3.92 | 4.51 | ||
NCS: nerve conduction study, DML: distal motor latency, SD: standard deviation.