| Literature DB >> 30809512 |
Beth Burgwyn Fuchs1, Soraya Eatemadpour1, Joseph M Martel-Foley2, Shannon Stott2, Mehmet Toner3, Eleftherios Mylonakis1.
Abstract
Systemic Candida infections remain a leading cause of nosocomial infections in the United States and worldwide. Many challenges remain in achieving rapid, direct diagnosis of fungal bloodstream infections due to limitations of conventional diagnostic methods that continue to demonstrate poor sensitivity, prolonged culture times that lead to delayed treatment, and detection variability between tests that compromises result reproducibility. Despite advancements in technology, mortality, and cost of care presented by blood stream infection with Candida spp. (candidemia) continues to rise and there is an urgent need for the development of novel methods to accurately detect Candida species present within the blood. This is especially true when patients are infected with drug resistant strains of Candida where accurate and immediate therapeutic treatment is of the importance. This study presents a method of separating fungal cells from lysed blood using inertial forces applied through microfluidics in order to abbreviate the time required to achieve a diagnosis by mitigating the need to grow blood cultures. We found that C. albicans can segregate into a focused stream distinct from white blood cells isolated within the Inertial Fungal Focuser (IFF) after red blood cell lysis. As a result of the focusing process, the collected cells are also concentrated 2.86 times. The same IFF device is applicable to non-albicans species: Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, and Candida tropicalis, providing both isolation from lysed blood and a reduction in solution volume. Thus, the devised platform provides a means to isolate medically significant fungal cells from blood and concentrate the cells for further interrogation.Entities:
Keywords: Candida; IFF; cell separation; fungal diagnostics; fungi; inertial focusing; microfluidics
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30809512 PMCID: PMC6379272 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Microbial strains used in this study.
| SC5314 (CAN14) | |
| ATCC 90030 | |
| ATCC 22019 | |
| ATCC 13803 |
Figure 1Fungal cells were FITC stained to differentiate from calcein stained WBCs. (A) Device schematic. (B) A mixture of cells that includes stained WBCs and fungal cells enters the IFF without prior separation and are subjected to the microfluidic forces and specified flow rate. (C) As cells travel through the path of the coil, at a specific flow rate of 400 μL/min, C. albicans are focused into a stream. (D) By the time they reach the outlet, the cell form two distinct streams. (E) The lateral separation of cell types was tested over a range to detect the optimal applied flow rate. (F) The distribution observed at device 100w-5-20-75 is shown in black and distribution for IFF device design 100w-10-20-70 is shown in gray. Error bars indicated standard deviation.
Percentage of recovered Candida species cells distributed among collection ports when using PBS as a flow medium.
| 1,600 cells/mL | 8.3 ± 8.7 | 90.0 ± 8.0 | 1.67 ± 2.0 | |
| 25.4 ± 4.7 | 61.7 ± 6.0 | 12.9 ± 1.4 | ||
| 5.3 ± 4.8 | 73.6 ± 4.6 | 21.1 ± 0.5 | ||
| 41.4 ± 1.6 | 52.9 ± 1.6 | 5.70 ± 3.2 | ||
| 160 cells/mL | 11.2 ± 22.4 | 85.6 ± 21.2 | 3.2 ± 6.3 | |
| 34.7 ± 7.8 | 55.9 ± 6.6 | 9.4 ± 2.6 | ||
| 5.7 ± 9.9 | 69.7 ± 10.7 | 24.6 ± 15.9 | ||
| 33.2 ± 13.6 | 62.6 ± 19.6 | 4.2 ± 6.0 | ||
| 16 cells/mL | 2.1 ± 4.2 | 91.2 ± 10.3 | 6.8 ± 8.9 | |
| 13.3 ± 5.4 | 67.6 ± 21.9 | 19.0 ± 16.5 | ||
| 7.3 ± 8.5 | 74.1 ± 9.1 | 18.6 ± 9.2 | ||
| 8.1 ± 11.4 | 85.7 ± 2.6 | 6.3 ± 8.8 |
Figure 2Percent distribution of fungal cell migration at different cell densities in PBS solution. The portion of fungal cells directed to the waste port, fungal cell port, and WBC port were determined for the most commonly encountered fungal species. (A) C. albicans (B) C. glabrata (C) C. parapsilosis, and (D) C. tropicalis. (E) A summary of the recovered cells from the fungal cells port is provided as a comparison between the tested Candida spp. Error bars indicated standard deviation.
Figure 3IFF data for C. albicans in lysed blood. (A) Distribution of the raw number of CFUs. (B) Percent distribution of C. albicans CFU between each port from cells spiked in whole blood from a starting concentration of cells was 8,000 cells per 5 mL sample. Error bars indicated standard deviation.