Literature DB >> 30809492

Long term efficacy and stability of corneal collagen cross linking for post-LASIK ectasia: an average of 80mo follow-up.

Walid Sharif1,2, Zaid Rushdi Ali2, Khaled Sharif2.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate efficacy and stability of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) in halting the progression of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ectasia and provide long-term follow-up results with an average of 80mo. Patients with post-LASIK ectasia were treated with CXL between December 2007 and January 2012. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuities (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA), minimum and maximum keratometry (K) values, spherical and cylindrical refraction, and corneal thickness. The study evaluated 17 eyes for 13 patients (8 men, 5 women) with mean age of 31y (range 23 to 39) and mean follow-up of 80.7±15 (range 57 to 102)mo. UDVA and CDVA improved from logMAR 0.53±0.36 (20/63) to 0.49±0.4 (20/50) (P=0.43) and from 0.18±0.17 (20/28) to 0.16±0.16 (20/27) (P=0.55) respectively. In 15 eyes UDVA and in 13 eyes CDVA either remained stable or improved ≥1 Snellen lines (88.2%) and (76.5%) respectively. Although statistically insignificant, spherical and cylindrical refraction decreased post-CXL from -1.26±2.87 to -0.38±2.32 diopters (D) (P=0.054) and from -3.80±2.47 to -3.04±2.18 D (P=0.13) respectively. Kmax significantly decreased from 44.23±3.76 to 42.85±3.08 D (P=0.013) and Kmin decreased from 41.07±3.61 to 40.00±2.65 D (P=0.057). Corneal thickness decreased from 470±42 to 460±41 µm, but was statistically non-significant (P=0.063). Therefore, CXL is effective in halting and partially reversing the progression of post-LASIK ectasia on the long-term (mean follow-up of more than 80mo), thus highlighting the stability and maintained effect of CXL for such cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corneal collagen cross linking; ectasia; post-LASIK; post-LASIK ectasia

Year:  2019        PMID: 30809492      PMCID: PMC6376228          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.02.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  6 in total

1.  Recurrent refractive error after myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis - What could be the reason?

Authors:  Radhika Natarajan; Raj S Paul
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus and Post-LASIK Ectasia and Failure Rate: A 3 Years Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Wassef Chanbour; Lulwa El Zein; Mohamad Ali Younes; Mohamad Issa; Pramod Warhekar; Elias Chelala; Elias Jarade
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-13

Review 3.  Ectasia After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Alyson N Tukan; Nour Bundogji; Harry Y Liu; Shannon E McCabe; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-08-20

4.  Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Combined Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Corneal Cross Linking versus Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Corneal Cross Linking.

Authors:  Yu Di; Fei Mo; Ying Li
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Visual and Topographic Outcomes of Corneal Collagen Cross Linking for Post LASIK Ectasia.

Authors:  Mohamed H Nasef; Sharif Y El Emam; Tamer I Haleem; Wesam S Shalaby; Waleed A Allam
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  Ectasia after keratorefractive surgery: Analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes in the Indian population.

Authors:  B Soundarya; Gitansha Shreyas Sachdev; Shreyas Ramamurthy; Ramamurthy Dandapani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.