| Literature DB >> 30809426 |
Adibe L Abdalla Filho1, Geovani T Costa Junior2, Paulo M T Lima3, Amin Soltangheisi4, Adibe L Abdalla3, Raquel Ghini5, Marisa C Piccolo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brazil has the largest commercial herd of ruminants with approximately 211 million head, representing 15% of world's beef production, in an area of 170 million hectares of grasslands, mostly cultivated with Brachiaria spp. Although nutrient reduction due to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has already been verified in important crops, studies evaluating its effects on fiber fractions and elemental composition of this grass genus are still scarce. Therefore, a better understanding of the effects of elevated CO2 on forage quality can elucidate the interaction between forage and livestock production and possible adaptations for a climate change scenario. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of contrasting atmospheric CO2 concentrations on biomass production, morphological characteristics, fiber fractions, and elemental composition of Brachiaria decumbens (cv. Basilisk).Entities:
Keywords: Brachiaria decumbens; Calcium; Climate change; FACE; Livestock
Year: 2019 PMID: 30809426 PMCID: PMC6385687 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Monthly precipitation (mm) (gray bars) and mean temperature (°C) (black squares) from January 2012 to July 2014.
Biomass productivity, average height, leaf, stem, senescence, and inflorescence proportions of Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk grown under contrasting atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
| Parameters | Treatments | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | Elevated CO2 ( | |||
| Biomass productivity (kg FM ha−1) | 28,657.6 ± 4,008.26 | 26,765.4 ± 3,554.44 | [−14856–11072] | 0.7619 |
| Biomass productivity (kg DM ha−1) | 5,654.5 ± 592.63 | 4,609.5 ± 610.67 | [−2811.18–721.05] | 0.2288 |
| Average height (cm) | 60.2 ± 2.41 | 53.7 ± 3.84 | [−16.53–3.65] | 0.1960 |
| Leaf proportion (%) | 38.5 ± 2.31 | 39.6 ± 2.21 | [−5.75–7.87] | 0.7471 |
| Stem proportion (%) | 48.5 ± 3.36 | 44.7 ± 1.65 | [−11.94–4.19] | 0.3249 |
| Senescence proportion (%) | 20.2 ± 1.89 | 21.1 ± 2.19 | [−5.17–6.93] | 0.7620 |
| Inflorescence proportion (%) | 3.0 ± 0.58 | 3.8 ± 1.06 | [−1.58–3.16] | 0.4915 |
Note:
Means ± standard error of the means; FM, fresh matter; DM, dry matter; Treatments: control, ambient conditions (≈390 μmol mol−1 CO2), elevated CO2, CO2 fertilization (≈550 μmol mol−1 CO2); CI, confidence interval.
Organic matter and fiber fractions of Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk grown under contrasting atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
| Parameters (g kg−1 DM) | Treatments | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | Elevated CO2 ( | |||
| Whole plant | ||||
| OM | 945.1 ± 1.70 | 944.4 ± 1.74 | [−5.49–4.20] | 0.7835 |
| aNDFom | 682.6 ± 8.02 | 671.9 ± 8.57 | [−35.88–14.41] | 0.3836 |
| ADFom | 398.5 ± 10.32 | 382.9 ± 8.80 | [−42.17–11.02] | 0.2983 |
| Lignin (sa) | 81.5 ± 3.20 | 77.4 ± 3.08 | [−12.64–4.62] | 0.3413 |
| HEMI | 284.1 ± 6.07 | 289.0 ± 3.36 | [−10.38–20.16] | 0.5083 |
| CEL | 317.0 ± 8.78 | 305.5 ± 6.77 | [−35.00–11.92] | 0.3139 |
| Leaf portion | ||||
| OM | 939.5 ± 1.41 | 942.3 ± 1.07 | [−0.69–6.33] | 0.1090 |
| aNDFom | 555.1 ± 7.00 | 564.1 ± 6.55 | [−7.36–25.38] | 0.2619 |
| ADFom | 274.9 ± 3.92 | 279.8 ± 5.13 | [−8.10–17.85] | 0.4389 |
| Lignin (sa) | 64.0 ± 4.99 | 67.6 ± 5.18 | [−8.36–15.40] | 0.5407 |
| HEMI | 280.2 ± 4.28 | 284.3 ± 5.43 | [−9.25–17.53] | 0.5230 |
| CEL | 210.9 ± 5.05 | 212.2 ± 6.26 | [−15.74–18.46] | 0.8689 |
| Stem portion | ||||
| OM | 957.4 ± 1.71 | 957.9 ± 1.50 | [−3.46–4.44] | 0.7964 |
| aNDFom | 778.0 ± 5.70 | 773.6 ± 7.40 | [−22.22–13,39] | 0.6075 |
| ADFom | 495.7 ± 6.16 | 491.7 ± 8.68 | [−27.35–19.27] | 0.7190 |
| Lignin (sa) | 107.4 ± 5.64 | 118.7 ± 17.41 | [−28.50–51.13] | 0.5567 |
| HEMI | 282.3 ± 4.07 | 281.9 ± 3.13 | [−12.32–11.52] | 0.9444 |
| CEL | 388.3 ± 5.91 | 373.0 ± 15.56 | [−48.97–18.26] | 0.3486 |
| Senescence portion | ||||
| OM | 931.1 ± 2.05 | 926.6 ± 4.07 | [−12.52–9.67] | 0.7896 |
| aNDFom | 739.8 ± 4.31 | 730.1 ± 5.26 | [−23.43–11.12] | 0.4612 |
| ADFom | 458.9 ± 9.16 | 445.4 ± 6.47 | [−30.95–16.00] | 0.5094 |
| Lignin (sa) | 91.0 ± 4.35 | 94.9 ± 3.54 | [−7.44–13.45] | 0.5502 |
| HEMI | 280.9 ± 5.71 | 284.6 ± 4.93 | [−13.34–16.03] | 0.8487 |
| CEL | 367.8 ± 5.89 | 350.5 ± 4.98 | [−29.60–8.65] | 0.2629 |
Note:
Means ± standard error of the means; DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; aNDFom, neutral detergent fiber; ADFom, acid detergent fiber; Lignin (sa), Lignin; HEMI, hemicellulose; CEL, cellulose; Treatments: control, ambient conditions (≈390 μmol mol−1 CO2), elevated CO2, CO2 fertilization (≈550 μmol mol−1 CO2); CI, confidence interval.
Multielemental and isotopic composition of Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk grown under contrasting atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
| Parameters | Treatments | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control ( | Elevated CO2 ( | |||
| Whole plant | ||||
| C (%) | 42.95 ± 0.228 | 42.22 ± 0.447 | [−1.78–0.32] | 0.1624 |
| N (%) | 1.9 ± 0.072 | 2.12 ± 0.094 | [−0.03–0.48] | 0.0885 |
| C:N | 22.97 ± 0.8 | 20.36 ± 0.896 | [−5.17−0.04] | 0.0462 |
| δ15N (‰) | 4.4 ± 0.107 | 4.4 ± 0.152 | [−0.42–0.43] | 0.9680 |
| K (%) | 1.43 ± 0.11 | 1.57 ± 0.066 | [−0.14–0.42] | 0.3308 |
| Leaf portion | ||||
| C (%) | 43.49 ± 0.221 | 43.76 ± 0.149 | [−0.31–0.85] | 0.3397 |
| N (%) | 2.78 ± 0.074 | 2.84 ± 0.059 | [−0.14–0.27] | 0.5278 |
| C:N | 15.82 ± 0.49 | 15.46 ± 0.318 | [−1.62–0.96] | 0.5776 |
| δ15N (‰) | 4.2 ± 0.104 | 4.6 ± 0.118 | [0.08–0.81] | 0.0188 |
| K (%) | 1.88 ± 0.071 | 1.83 ± 0.054 | [−0.24–0.13] | 0.5363 |
| Stem portion | ||||
| C (%) | 41.35 ± 0.181 | 41.57 ± 0.142 | [−0.18–0.61] | 0.2782 |
| N (%) | 1.43 ± 0.051 | 1.43 ± 0.063 | [−0.17–0.16] | 0.9898 |
| C:N | 29.32 ± 1.097 | 29.76 ± 1.359 | [−3.19–4.08] | 0.7998 |
| δ15N (‰) | 4.2 ± 0.16 | 4.9 ± 0.138 | [0.13–1.11] | 0.0162 |
| K (%) | 1.66 ± 0.086 | 1.72 ± 0.080 | [−0.20–0.32] | 0.6161 |
| Senescence portion | ||||
| C (%) | 40.8 ± 0.175 | 40.5 ± 0.36 | [−1.23–0.63] | 0.5006 |
| N (%) | 1.24 ± 0.048 | 1.32 ± 0.048 | [−0.05–0.22] | 0.2386 |
| C:N | 33.15 ± 1.279 | 31.07 ± 1.23 | [−5.69–1.13] | 0.1755 |
| δ15N (‰) | 4.6 ± 0.151 | 5.1 ± 0.163 | [−0.10–0.97] | 0.1053 |
| K (%) | 1.2 ± 0.056 | 1.29 ± 0.069 | [−0.11–0.30] | 0.3626 |
Note:
Means ± standard error of the means; a,bDifferent letters in the same row indicate statistical difference; Treatments: control, ambient conditions (≈390 μmol mol−1 CO2); Elevated CO2, CO2 fertilization (≈550 μmol mol−1 CO2); CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Concentrations (mg kg−1) of K (A), S (B), P (C), Fe (D), Mn (E), and Ca (F) on the whole plant, leaf, stem, and senescence portions of Brachiaria decumbens cv. Basilisk grown under contrasting CO2.
Control—Ambient conditions (≈390 μmol mol−1 CO2), Elevated CO2—CO2 fertilization (≈550 μmol mol−1 CO2). Bars are standard error of the means (n = 12).