Literature DB >> 30809045

Characteristics and quality of genetics and genomics mobile apps: a systematic review.

Divya Talwar1,2, Yu-Lyu Yeh1, Wei-Ju Chen1, Lei-Shih Chen3.   

Abstract

Mobile applications (apps) have been increasingly utilized to access the latest and abundant information related to genetics/genomics for resources, risk assessments, and individualized recommendations. Nevertheless, the number and quality of the current apps in genetics/genomics remain unknown. Thus, in this review, we aimed to identify existing genetic/genomic apps, summarize their characteristics, and examine their quality. A systematic search of genetics/genomics apps was conducted on Apple Store and Google Play. We adapted a validated evaluation scale, Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), to examine the quality of genetics/genomics apps. Eighty-eight genetics/genomics apps, with the cost ranging from free to $49.99, formed the final sample. Findings showed that the majority of the apps had reference/resource as a feature (95.5%), had health professional students as the target audience (86.4%), and did not focus on specific diseases (78.5%). Only 21.6% of the apps were developed by reliable or authoritative agencies, and the apps' overall quality was slightly above average based on the criteria of the MARS. Therefore, while genetics/genomics mobile apps might be useful resources, their quality still needs improvement, especially with respect to the credibility and evidence-based items of app information as well as the customization items of app engagement; caution must be taken when using those apps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30809045      PMCID: PMC6777522          DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0360-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  20 in total

1.  Essential nursing competencies for genetics and genomics: implications for critical care.

Authors:  Lynnette Howington; Kristina Riddlesperger; Dennis J Cheek
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.708

2.  Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection.

Authors:  Joel A Wolf; Jacqueline F Moreau; Oleg Akilov; Timothy Patton; Joseph C English; Jonhan Ho; Laura K Ferris
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Physician Assistant Genomic Competencies.

Authors:  Constance Goldgar; Ed Michaud; Nguyen Park; Jean Jenkins
Journal:  J Physician Assist Educ       Date:  2016-09

4.  Behavior change techniques in top-ranked mobile apps for physical activity.

Authors:  David E Conroy; Chih-Hsiang Yang; Jaclyn P Maher
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Putting the Pieces Together: Clinically Relevant Genetic and Genomic Resources for Hospitalists and Neonatologists.

Authors:  Rebecca Miller; Alina Khromykh; Holly Babcock; Callie Jenevein; Benjamin D Solomon
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2017-02

Review 6.  A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline Lorene Bender; Rossini Ying Kwan Yue; Matthew Jason To; Laetitia Deacken; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Apps for People With Rheumatoid Arthritis to Monitor Their Disease Activity: A Review of Apps for Best Practice and Quality.

Authors:  Rebecca Grainger; Hermaleigh Townsley; Bonnie White; Tobias Langlotz; William J Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Behavioral Activation Apps for Depression.

Authors:  Anna Huguet; Sanjay Rao; Patrick J McGrath; Lori Wozney; Mike Wheaton; Jill Conrod; Sharlene Rozario
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey.

Authors:  Paul Krebs; Dustin T Duncan
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  A New Tool for Nutrition App Quality Evaluation (AQEL): Development, Validation, and Reliability Testing.

Authors:  Kristen Nicole DiFilippo; Wenhao Huang; Karen M Chapman-Novakofski
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.773

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Oral-Hygiene-Related Mobile Apps in the French App Stores: Assessment of Functionality and Quality.

Authors:  Florence Carrouel; Denis Bourgeois; Céline Clément; Delphine Tardivo; Prescilla Martinon; Sébastien Guiral; Romain Lan; Stéphane Viennot; Claude Dussart; Laurie Fraticelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  The good, the bad, and the poorly designed: The mobile app stores are not a user-friendly experience for health and medical purposes.

Authors:  Timothy Aungst; Sheila Seed; Nurisha Gobin; Rosa Jung
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 3.  Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps in the French App Stores: Assessment of Functionality and Quality.

Authors:  Prescilla Martinon; Ina Saliasi; Laurie Fraticelli; Florence Carrouel; Denis Bourgeois; Colette Smentek; Claude Dussart
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 4.  Patient-facing genetic and genomic mobile apps in the UK: a systematic review of content, functionality, and quality.

Authors:  Norina Gasteiger; Amy Vercell; Alan Davies; Dawn Dowding; Naz Khan; Angela Davies
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-02-19

Review 5.  Evaluation of M-Health Applications Use in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Niloofar Mohammadzadeh; Sahar Khenarinezhad; Ehsan Ghazanfarisavadkoohi; Mohammad Saleh Safari; Shahrbanoo Pahlevanynejad
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.429

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.