| Literature DB >> 30808908 |
Cheng-Gang Ren1, Cun-Cui Kong1, Kun Yan1, Zhi-Hong Xie2.
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhiza can improve the salt-tolerance of host plant. A systematic study of mycorrhizal plant responses to salt stress may provide insights into the acquired salt tolerance. Here, the transcriptional profiles of mycorrhizal Sesbania cannabina shoot and root under saline stress were obtained by RNA-Seq. Using weighted gene coexpression network analysis and pairwise comparisons, we identified coexpressed modules, networks and hub genes in mycorrhizal S. cannabina in response to salt stress. In total, 10,371 DEGs were parsed into five coexpression gene modules. One module was positively correlated with both salt treatment and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) inoculation, and associated with photosynthesis and ROS scavenging in both enzymatic and nonenzymatic pathways. The hub genes in the module were mostly transcription factors including WRKY, MYB, ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR, and TCP members involved in the circadian clock and might represent central regulatory components of acquired salinity tolerance in AM S. cannabina. The expression patterns of 12 genes involved in photosynthesis, oxidation-reduction processes, and several transcription factors revealed by qRT-PCR confirmed the RNA-Seq data. This large-scale assessment of Sesbania genomic resources will help in exploring the molecular mechanisms underlying plant-AM fungi interaction in salt stress responses.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30808908 PMCID: PMC6391373 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39463-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Summary of sequences analysis.
| Sample | Raw Reads | Clean reads | Clean bases (Gb) | Error(%) | Q20(%) | Q30(%) | GC(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL1 | 71017240 | 69794736 | 10.47 | 0.01 | 97.53 | 93.84 | 45.05 |
| AL2 | 54528464 | 53599538 | 8.04 | 0.01 | 97.27 | 93.34 | 44.2 |
| AR1 | 59044588 | 58109962 | 8.72 | 0.01 | 97.32 | 93.49 | 43.74 |
| AR2 | 60546522 | 59470218 | 8.92 | 0.01 | 97.2 | 93.24 | 43.8 |
| ASSL3H1 | 59932512 | 59100412 | 8.87 | 0.01 | 97.56 | 93.9 | 44.2 |
| ASSL3H2 | 57653340 | 56751508 | 8.51 | 0.01 | 97.52 | 93.79 | 44.12 |
| ASSR3H1 | 46719808 | 45198466 | 6.78 | 0.02 | 96.75 | 92.11 | 44.01 |
| ASSR3H2 | 47367722 | 45444750 | 6.82 | 0.02 | 96.4 | 91.61 | 44.13 |
| ASSL27H1 | 46241954 | 44805784 | 6.72 | 0.02 | 96.75 | 92.03 | 44.44 |
| ASSL27H2 | 70153642 | 67008172 | 10.05 | 0.02 | 96.83 | 92.07 | 44.3 |
| ASSR27H1 | 47129888 | 45581658 | 6.84 | 0.02 | 96.52 | 91.74 | 44.15 |
| ASSR27H2 | 49307974 | 46375310 | 6.96 | 0.03 | 94.76 | 87.97 | 44.38 |
| L1 | 51623710 | 48636508 | 7.3 | 0.03 | 94.77 | 87.66 | 44.36 |
| L2 | 46500884 | 43656432 | 6.55 | 0.03 | 94.55 | 87.32 | 44.44 |
| R1 | 46891272 | 43971630 | 6.6 | 0.02 | 96.1 | 90.69 | 43.71 |
| R2 | 48598584 | 45774804 | 6.87 | 0.02 | 96.43 | 91.34 | 43.98 |
| SSL3H1 | 48885732 | 45831444 | 6.87 | 0.03 | 94.64 | 87.73 | 45.01 |
| SSL3H2 | 53389098 | 49955944 | 7.49 | 0.03 | 94.37 | 87.01 | 44.91 |
| SSR3H1 | 45251108 | 42354266 | 6.35 | 0.03 | 94.61 | 87.46 | 44.16 |
| SSR3H2 | 49960204 | 46841530 | 7.03 | 0.02 | 94.71 | 88.05 | 44.32 |
| SSL27H1 | 53165568 | 49679022 | 7.45 | 0.03 | 94.26 | 86.87 | 44.48 |
| SSL27H2 | 49662402 | 46455738 | 6.97 | 0.03 | 94.33 | 86.88 | 44.51 |
| SSR27H1 | 45342204 | 42252524 | 6.34 | 0.02 | 95.46 | 89.51 | 44.21 |
| SSR27H2 | 45294674 | 42813126 | 6.42 | 0.02 | 96.88 | 92.29 | 44 |
| Total | 1254209094 | 1199463482 | 179.94 |
R, root; L, shoot; A, AM-inoculated; SS, salt stressd; H, Hour; Q20, The percentage of bases with a Phred value > 20; Q30, The percentage of bases with a Phred value > 30.
BLAST analysis of non-redundant unigenes against public databases.
| Number of Genes | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Annotated in NR | 180065 | 61.88 |
| Annotated in NT | 179437 | 61.66 |
| Annotated in KO | 75476 | 25.93 |
| Annotated in SwissProt | 6939 | 2.38 |
| Annotated in PFAM | 128079 | 44.01 |
| Annotated in GO | 129894 | 44.64 |
| Annotated in KOG | 70231 | 24.13 |
| Annotated in all Databases | 1505 | 0.51 |
| Annotated in at least one Database | 215546 | 74.07 |
| Total Unigenes | 290972 | 100 |
Figure 1Functional annotation and classfication of S. cannabina transcriptome. (A), GO categorization of non-redundant unigenes. Each annotated sequence was assigned at least one GO term. (B), COG annotation of putative proteins. (B), KEGG annotation of putative proteins. The capital letters against the colored bars indicate five main categories, (A) cellular processes; (B) environmental information processing; (C) genetic information processing; (D) metabolism; and (E) organism systems.
Figure 2Venn diagrams of differentially expressed transcripts in AM and NM plants under saline treatment in S. cannabina plantlets. (a), Numbers of DEGs exclusively upregulated in each treatment; (b), Numbers of DEGs exclusively downregulated in each treatment. The numbers of DEGs with common or opposite expression change tendencies between treatments are shown in the overlapping regions. The total numbers of up- or downregulated genes in each treatment are the sum of the numbers in each circle.
Figure 3Gene co-expression modules in S. cannabina tissues showing the cluster dendrogram constructed based on the eigengenes of the modules (above) and the heatmap for the correlation coefficient between the modules (below).
Figure 4Network visualization of interactions between hub genes in bule module. Transcription factors are labeled with name. Eighty-five genes (top 3% of hub) are visualized by Cytoscape.