Literature DB >> 30808833

Efficacy of Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Techniques with Vitrectomy for Macular Detachment Associated with an Optic Disc Pit.

Salvador Pastor-Idoate1,2, María Gómez-Resa3, Sarah Karam4, Sergio Copete1,2, Danai Kyriakou1,2, Claudia García-Arumí Fusté1, Natalia Pastora5, Jeroni Nadal4, José García-Arumí6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the anatomical and functional outcome of adjuvant pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) procedures using the techniques of translocation of an internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and transplantation of an inverted ILM flap for the treatment of chronic and/or refractory optic disc pit (ODP) maculopathy.
METHODS: In this prospective interventional case series study, 9 patients (9 eyes) with chronic and/or refractory ODP maculopathy underwent PPV with either translocation of an ILM flap or transplantation of an inverted ILM flap as adjuvant techniques along with gas tamponade. The anatomical success, rates of macular reattachment, and visual improvement were assessed.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative central retinal thickness (CRT) was 723.4 µm (range: 366-1,151). The mean postoperative CRT was 398.1 ± 212.2 µm (range: 210-758). An increased preoperative CRT was associated with a lower chance of postoperative reattachment of the macula (p = 0.047). The overall reattachment rate at the end of the follow-up period was 56% (n = 5). The mean preoperative visual acuity (logMAR unit [Snellen acuity]) was 0.48 (20/60) (range: 1.30 [20/400] to 0.10 [20/25]). The mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.48 ± 0.233 logMAR units (approx. 3 lines of visual improvement).
CONCLUSIONS: ILM flap techniques are logical and straightforward approaches as adjuvants to PPV treatment of ODP maculopathy. They could be viable adjuvant treatments for improvement in BCVA and CRT in patients with ODP maculopathy.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flap; Internal limiting membrane; Optic disc pit maculopathy; Optical coherence tomography; Pars plana vitrectomy; Peel

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30808833     DOI: 10.1159/000495621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  6 in total

1.  Total retinal detachment and contractile movement of the disc in eyes with morning glory syndrome.

Authors:  Masuo Sakamoto; Kazuki Kuniyoshi; Shion Hayashi; Hidetoshi Yamashita; Shunji Kusaka
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2020-10-15

2.  Surgical Options for Optic Disc Pit Maculopathy: Perspectives and Controversies.

Authors:  Salvador Pastor-Idoate; Claudia García-Arumí Fusté; Luis García-Onrubia; Sergio Copete; José García-Arumí
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-16

3.  Optic nerve pit maculopathy worsened during pregnancy: a case report.

Authors:  Laura A Torrado-Cobian; George D Fivgas
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Internal limiting membrane packing for treatment of morning glory syndrome with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Jinyan Shen; Xuan Chen; Xuechun Gong; Zhifeng Wu
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-02

5.  Unilateral double optic nerve head pits with foveo-schisis detachment treated by modified internal limiting membrane peeling technique.

Authors:  Kshitiz Kumar; Debashish Bhattacharya
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Surgical outcomes in patients with optic disc pit maculopathy: does peeling the ILM lead to better outcomes?

Authors:  Helena Wagner; Amelie Pielen; Hansjürgen Agostini; Daniel Böhringer; Wolf Alexander Lagrèze; Julia Biermann
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.