| Literature DB >> 30808360 |
Nlandu Roger Ngatu1, Sakiko Kanbara2, Andre Renzaho3, Roger Wumba4, Etongola P Mbelambela5, Sifa M J Muchanga6, Basilua Andre Muzembo7, Ngombe Leon-Kabamba8, Choomplang Nattadech7, Tomoko Suzuki7, Numbi Oscar-Luboya9, Koji Wada7, Mitsunori Ikeda2, Sayumi Nojima2, Tomohiko Sugishita10, Shunya Ikeda7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria is one of the most severe public health issues that result in massive morbidity and mortality in most countries of the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study aimed to determine the scope of household, accessibility to malaria care and factors associated with household malaria in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).Entities:
Keywords: Environment; Household malaria; Income; Sanitation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30808360 PMCID: PMC6390528 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2679-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Characteristics of respondents and households
| Characteristics | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| (1) Respondents (household heads; n = 152) | ||
| Gender | ||
| Male | 78 | 51.3 |
| Female | 74 | 48.7 |
| Age (years) | ||
| 20–29 | 24 | 15.8 |
| 30–39 | 61 | 40.2 |
| 40–49 | 37 | 24.3 |
| 50–70 | 30 | 19.7 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 99 | 65.1 |
| Divorced | 6 | 4.0 |
| Widowed | 8 | 5.2 |
| Single with children | 22 | 14.5 |
| Single without children | 17 | 11.2 |
| Education | ||
| Never gone to school | 11 | 7.2 |
| Primary | 8 | 5.3 |
| High school | 63 | 41.5 |
| Technical school | 25 | 16.4 |
| University/College | 45 | 29.6 |
| Occupation | ||
| Unemployed | 119 | 78.3 |
| Employed | 33 | 21.7 |
| (2) Households (total members: n = 1029) | ||
| Family/household size | ||
| 2–5 | 71 | 46.7 |
| 6–18 | 81 | 53.3 |
| Households with children < 5 years | ||
| No | 45 | 29.6 |
| Yes | 107 | 70.4 |
| Residential area | ||
| Rural | 70 | 46.0 |
| Urban | 82 | 54.0 |
| Monthly income status | ||
| Overall less than 50 USD | 114 | 75 |
| 50 USD or more | 38 | 25 |
| Rural less than 50 USD | 62 | 88.6 |
| 50 USD or more | 8 | 11.4 |
| Urban Less than 50 USD | 48 | 58.5 |
| 50 USD or more | 34 | 41.5 |
| Access to electricity | ||
| Yes | 134 | 88.2 |
| No | 12 | 7.9 |
| No answer | 6 | 3.9 |
| Use of means of communication | ||
| Television (yes) | 89 | 58.6 |
| Radio (yes) | 126 | 82.9 |
| Telephone (yes) | 133 | 87.5 |
| Type of toilet used (n = 147) | ||
| Pit latrine with slab and flush | 10 | 6.8 |
| Pit latrine with slab/manual flush | 22 | 14.9 |
| Pit latrine without slab | 115 | 78.2 |
| Shared latrine with neighbors (n = 152) | ||
| Yes | 88 | 57.9 |
| No | 57 | 37.5 |
| Other | 7 | 4.6 |
| Water source (n = 151) | ||
| Indoor tap water (yes) | 63 | 41.7 |
| Outdoor tap water or water well (yes) | 88 | 58.3 |
USD United States’ dollar
Fig. 1Proportion of households (a), proportion of malaria-affected households (b) and malaria frequency (c) by study site. The figure shows that there was no significant difference between households from rural and urban sites in terms of participation rate and frequency of malaria in the previous 12 months, whereas a markedly higher proportion of households (96.7%) reported at least one malaria case in the last 12 months (vs. 3.3% for non-affected households; p < 0.001)
Fig. 2Household use of preventive measures (a) and malaria frequency (b). The figure shows that the majority of households owned insecticide-treated bed net (ITN); however, malaria frequency was not significantly different among households when considering the use of preventive measures (ITN users vs. ITN non-users). ITN: insecticide-treated bed nets; p, p-value
Fig. 3Household income status (a) and malaria frequency (b). The figure shows that a higher proportion of households earning less than 50 USD monthly (a), and that poorer households tended to have higher frequency of malaria (b). USD: American dollar; p: p-value
Fig. 4Malaria frequency by quality of latrine (a, b), quality of water source (c, d) and presence/absence of periodic sanitation intervention (e, f). The figure shows significantly higher frequency of malaria in households sing inappropriate latrine (b) and those living in areas with absence of periodic sanitation intervention (f)
Fig. 5Accessibility to malaria care by affected respondents. The figure shows that 24.1% of malaria-affected respondents did not undergo malaria treatment at a health setting. Instead, they used either a traditional remedy or self-medication
Association between household sociodemographic characteristics, WASH status and household malaria by multivariate logistic regression analysis
| Variable | OR | SE | 95% CI | P | aOR | SE | 95% CI | Adjusted P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Household size | 1.3 | 0.08 | 1.14–1.49 |
|
| 0.13 | 1.18–1.73 | |
| Preventive measures (ITN vs. other) | 0.41 | 0.15 | 0.18–0.87 |
| 0.47 | 0.23 | 0.17–1.25 | 0.133 |
| Periodic WASH intervention (Yes vs. no) | 1.86 | 0.23 | 0.10–1.26 | 1.83 | 1.15 | 1.10–2.54 | ||
| Water source (appropriate?: no vs. yes) | 0.48 | 0.19 | 0.22–1.07 | 0.076 |
| 0.18 | 1.17–2.96 | |
| Monthly income (< 50 USD vs. 50–700 USD) | 1.71 | 0.28 | 1.23–3.51 | 1.68 | 0.45 | 1.46–2.36 |
ITN Insecticide-treated bed net, aOR adjusted odds ratio, p p-value, WASH water-sanitation-hygiene status, USD United States’ dollar
Italic values indicate the significance of p-values less than 0.05