Literature DB >> 30808271

Breaking voice identity perception: Expressive voices are more confusable for listeners.

Nadine Lavan1,2, Luke Fk Burston2, Paayal Ladwa2, Siobhan E Merriman2, Sarah Knight1, Carolyn McGettigan1,2.   

Abstract

The human voice is a highly flexible instrument for self-expression, yet voice identity perception is largely studied using controlled speech recordings. Using two voice-sorting tasks with naturally varying stimuli, we compared the performance of listeners who were familiar and unfamiliar with the TV show Breaking Bad. Listeners organised audio clips of speech with (1) low-expressiveness and (2) high-expressiveness into perceived identities. We predicted that increased expressiveness (e.g., shouting, strained voice) would significantly impair performance. Overall, while unfamiliar listeners were less able to generalise identity across exemplars, the two groups performed equivalently well when telling voices apart when dealing with low-expressiveness stimuli. However, high vocal expressiveness significantly impaired telling apart in both the groups: this led to increased misidentifications, where sounds from one character were assigned to the other. These misidentifications were highly consistent for familiar listeners but less consistent for unfamiliar listeners. Our data suggest that vocal flexibility has powerful effects on identity perception, where changes in the acoustic properties of vocal signals introduced by expressiveness lead to effects apparent in familiar and unfamiliar listeners alike. At the same time, expressiveness appears to have affected other aspects of voice identity processing selectively in one listener group but not the other, thus revealing complex interactions of stimulus properties and listener characteristics (i.e., familiarity) in identity processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Within-person variability; expressiveness; sorting task; voice identity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30808271     DOI: 10.1177/1747021819836890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  8 in total

1.  Acoustic voice variation within and between speakers.

Authors:  Yoonjeong Lee; Patricia Keating; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speaker discrimination performance for "easy" versus "hard" voices in style-matched and -mismatched speech.

Authors:  Amber Afshan; Jody Kreiman; Abeer Alwan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Human voice pitch measures are robust across a variety of speech recordings: methodological and theoretical implications.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Agata Groyecka-Bernard; Piotr Sorokowski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.812

4.  Acoustic voice variation in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Yoonjeong Lee; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Listeners form average-based representations of individual voice identities.

Authors:  Nadine Lavan; Sarah Knight; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Sorting through the impact of familiarity when processing vocal identity: Results from a voice sorting task.

Authors:  Sarah V Stevenage; Ashley E Symons; Abi Fletcher; Chantelle Coen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Comparing unfamiliar voice and face identity perception using identity sorting tasks.

Authors:  Justine Johnson; Carolyn McGettigan; Nadine Lavan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Unimodal and cross-modal identity judgements using an audio-visual sorting task: Evidence for independent processing of faces and voices.

Authors:  Nadine Lavan; Harriet M J Smith; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-07-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.