Literature DB >> 3080801

Radiobiological effectiveness (RBE) of megavoltage X-ray and electron beams in radiotherapy.

H I Amols, B Lagueux, D Cagna.   

Abstract

Recent experiments indicate that significant differences exist in the microdosimetric properties (i.e., lineal energy distributions) of megavoltage X-ray and electron beams used in radiation therapy. In particular, dose averaged values of lineal energy for 18 MeV electrons are 10-30% lower than for 10 MeV bremsstrahlung X rays, which in turn are 30-60% lower than for 250 kVp X rays. Differences of this magnitude may manifest themselves in observable radiobiological effectiveness (RBE) differences between these radiations. Cell survival data have been obtained for line DLD-1 human tumor cells on all three of the above radiation sources. Results clearly demonstrate an RBE difference between orthovoltage and megavoltage radiation (P = 0.001). A small difference is also measured in RBE between megavoltage photons and megavoltage electrons, but the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.25). All biological, dosimetric, and microdosimetric data were obtained under nearly identical geometric conditions. These data raise interesting questions vis à vis the applicability of microdosimetric theories in the interpretation of biological effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3080801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  4 in total

1.  Using electron beam radiation to simulate the dose distribution for whole body solar particle event proton exposure.

Authors:  Keith A Cengel; Eric S Diffenderfer; Stephen Avery; Ann R Kennedy; James McDonough
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Orthovoltage X-Rays Exhibit Increased Efficacy Compared with γ-Rays in Preclinical Irradiation.

Authors:  Brett I Bell; Justin Vercellino; N Patrik Brodin; Christian Velten; Lalitha S Y Nanduri; Prashanth K B Nagesh; Kathryn E Tanaka; Yanan Fang; Yanhua Wang; Rodney Macedo; Jeb English; Michelle M Schumacher; Phaneendra K Duddempudi; Patrik Asp; Wade Koba; Shahin Shajahan; Laibin Liu; Wolfgang A Tomé; Weng-Lang Yang; Richard Kolesnick; Chandan Guha
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 13.312

3.  Report on G4-Med, a Geant4 benchmarking system for medical physics applications developed by the Geant4 Medical Simulation Benchmarking Group.

Authors:  P Arce; D Bolst; M-C Bordage; J M C Brown; P Cirrone; M A Cortés-Giraldo; D Cutajar; G Cuttone; L Desorgher; P Dondero; A Dotti; B Faddegon; C Fedon; S Guatelli; S Incerti; V Ivanchenko; D Konstantinov; I Kyriakou; G Latyshev; A Le; C Mancini-Terracciano; M Maire; A Mantero; M Novak; C Omachi; L Pandola; A Perales; Y Perrot; G Petringa; J M Quesada; J Ramos-Méndez; F Romano; A B Rosenfeld; L G Sarmiento; D Sakata; T Sasaki; I Sechopoulos; E C Simpson; T Toshito; D H Wright
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Relative biological effectiveness of simulated solar particle event proton radiation to induce acute hematological change in the porcine model.

Authors:  Jenine K Sanzari; Steven X Wan; Eric S Diffenderfer; Keith A Cengel; Ann R Kennedy
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.724

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.