Literature DB >> 30808008

Group-level and functional-region analysis of electric-field shape during cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation with different electrode montages.

Jose Gomez-Tames1, Akihiro Asai, Marko Mikkonen, Ilkka Laakso, Satoshi Tanaka, Shintaro Uehara, Yohei Otaka, Akimasa Hirata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) is a neuromodulation scheme that delivers a small current to the cerebellum. In this work, we computationally investigate the distributions and strength of the stimulation dosage during ctDCS with the aim of determining the targeted cerebellar regions of a group of subjects with different electrode montages. APPROACH: We used a new inter-individual registration method that permitted the projection of computed electric fields (EFs) from individual realistic head models (n  =  18) to standard cerebellar template for the first time. MAIN
RESULTS: Variations of the EF on the cerebellar surface were found to have standard deviations of up to 55% of the mean. The dominant factor that accounted for 62% of the variability of the maximum EFs was the skin-cerebellum distance, whereas the cerebrospinal fluid volume explained 53% of the average EF distribution. Despite the inter-individual variations, a systematic tendency of the EF hotspot emerges beneath the active electrode in group-level analysis. The hotspot can be adjusted by the electrode position so that the most effective stimulation is delivered to a group of subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: Targeting specific cerebellar structures with ctDCS is not straightforward, as neuromodulation depends not only on the placement/design of the electrodes configuration but also on inter-individual variability due to anatomical differences. The proposed method permitted generalizing the EFs to a cerebellum atlas. The atlas is useful for studying the mechanisms of ctDCS, planning ctDCS and explaining findings of experimental studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30808008     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab0ac5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  7 in total

1.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Cerebellum in Emotion.

Authors:  Jana Klaus; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Cerebellar tDCS Alters the Perception of Optic Flow.

Authors:  Jean-François Nankoo; Christopher R Madan; Omar Medina; Tyler Makepeace; Christopher L Striemer
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Group and individual level variations between symmetric and asymmetric DLPFC montages for tDCS over large scale brain network nodes.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Soleimani; Mehrdad Saviz; Marom Bikson; Farzad Towhidkhah; Rayus Kuplicki; Martin P Paulus; Hamed Ekhtiari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Cerebellar rTMS and PAS effectively induce cerebellar plasticity.

Authors:  Martje G Pauly; Annika Steinmeier; Christina Bolte; Feline Hamami; Elinor Tzvi; Alexander Münchau; Tobias Bäumer; Anne Weissbach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Electrode montage-dependent intracranial variability in electric fields induced by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Jana Klaus; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  A Brief History of Cerebellar Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Gustavo V Ponce; Jana Klaus; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.648

7.  Multiscale Computational Model Reveals Nerve Response in a Mouse Model for Temporal Interference Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Jose Gomez-Tames; Akihiro Asai; Akimasa Hirata
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.