Olivier J Barthelemy1, Mark A Richardson1, Timothy C Heeren2, Clara A Chen3, Jane M Liebschutz4,5,6, Leah S Forman3, Howard J Cabral2, Deborah A Frank4,7, Ruth Rose-Jacobs4,7. 1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research in Health Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Studies examining cross-sectional associations between age at marijuana initiation and memory deficits yield mixed results. Because longitudinal data are sparse, controversy continues regarding whether these deficits reflect premorbid risk factors or sequelae of early marijuana initiation; here, we examine this question in a community sample followed since birth. METHOD: Masked examiners administered four subtests of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML/WRAML2) from childhood until young adulthood to 119 urban, predominantly African American participants. Multivariable generalized estimated equation models measured longitudinal trajectories of learning. Participants were grouped as never users (n = 26), later initiators (≥16 years old; n = 31), and earlier initiators of marijuana use (n = 62). RESULTS: Marijuana onset groups did not significantly differ on WRAML scaled scores or IQ in childhood, nor did they differ on WRAML scaled scores in adolescence. On most WRAML2 subtests, these groups did not significantly differ in young adulthood after taking into account sex and childhood IQ. However, on Story Memory, later initiators attained higher scaled scores in young adulthood, even after including additional covariates of anxiety, depression, postsecondary education, past-month marijuana use, and past-week high-risk drinking. They showed a significantly more positive trajectory than never users that was driven by within-group improvement after adolescence. Earlier initiators showed within-group decline in Story Memory after adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in learning following earlier initiation of marijuana use may not be solely attributable to premorbid deficits.
OBJECTIVE: Studies examining cross-sectional associations between age at marijuana initiation and memory deficits yield mixed results. Because longitudinal data are sparse, controversy continues regarding whether these deficits reflect premorbid risk factors or sequelae of early marijuana initiation; here, we examine this question in a community sample followed since birth. METHOD: Masked examiners administered four subtests of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML/WRAML2) from childhood until young adulthood to 119 urban, predominantly African American participants. Multivariable generalized estimated equation models measured longitudinal trajectories of learning. Participants were grouped as never users (n = 26), later initiators (≥16 years old; n = 31), and earlier initiators of marijuana use (n = 62). RESULTS:Marijuana onset groups did not significantly differ on WRAML scaled scores or IQ in childhood, nor did they differ on WRAML scaled scores in adolescence. On most WRAML2 subtests, these groups did not significantly differ in young adulthood after taking into account sex and childhood IQ. However, on Story Memory, later initiators attained higher scaled scores in young adulthood, even after including additional covariates of anxiety, depression, postsecondary education, past-month marijuana use, and past-week high-risk drinking. They showed a significantly more positive trajectory than never users that was driven by within-group improvement after adolescence. Earlier initiators showed within-group decline in Story Memory after adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in learning following earlier initiation of marijuana use may not be solely attributable to premorbid deficits.
Authors: Tamara L Brown; Kate Flory; Donald R Lynam; Carl Leukefeld; Richard R Clayton Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Maria Alice Fontes; Karen I Bolla; Paulo Jannuzzi Cunha; Priscila Previato Almeida; Flávia Jungerman; Ronaldo Ramos Laranjeira; Rodrigo A Bressan; Acioly L T Lacerda Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Madeline H Meier; Avshalom Caspi; Antony Ambler; HonaLee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richard S E Keefe; Kay McDonald; Aimee Ward; Richie Poulton; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicholas J Jackson; Joshua D Isen; Rubin Khoddam; Daniel Irons; Catherine Tuvblad; William G Iacono; Matt McGue; Adrian Raine; Laura A Baker Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ruth Rose-Jacobs; Shayna Soenksen; Danielle P Appugliese; Howard J Cabral; Mark A Richardson; Marjorie Beeghly; Timothy C Heeren; Deborah A Frank Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Rayna B Hirst; Kaitlyn R Young; Louise M Sodos; Robert E Wickham; Mitch Earleywine Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Staci A Gruber; Mary Kathryn Dahlgren; Kelly A Sagar; Atilla Gönenç; Scott E Lukas Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jennifer A Willford; Lidush Goldschmidt; Natacha M De Genna; Nancy L Day; Gale A Richardson Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 3.763