Literature DB >> 30806569

Modelling the impact of multiple sclerosis on life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years and total lifetime costs: Evidence from Australia.

Andrew J Palmer1, Ingrid van der Mei2, Bruce V Taylor2, Philip M Clarke3, Steve Simpson1, Hasnat Ahmad2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantify life expectancy (LE), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and total lifetime societal costs for a hypothetical cohort of Australians with multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS: A 4-state Markov model simulated progression from no/mild to moderate and severe disability and death for a cohort of 35-year-old women over a lifetime horizon. Death risks were calculated from Australian life tables, adjusted by disability severity. State-dependent relapse probabilities and associated disutilities were considered. Probabilities of MS progression and relapse were estimated from AusLong and TasMSL MS epidemiological databases. Annual societal (direct and indirect) costs (2017 Australian dollars) and health-state utilities for each state were derived from the Australian MS Longitudinal Study. Costs were discounted at 5% annually.
RESULTS: Mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) LE from age 35 years was 42.7 (41.6-43.8) years. This was 7.5 years less than the general Australian population. Undiscounted QALYs were 28.2 (26.3-30.0), a loss of 13.1 QALYs versus the Australian population. Discounted lifetime costs were $942,754 ($347,856-$2,820,219).
CONCLUSION: We have developed a health economics model of the progression of MS, calculating the impact of MS on LE, QALYs and lifetime costs in Australia. It will form the basis for future cost-effectiveness analyses of interventions for MS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Markov model; Multiple sclerosis; QALYs; life expectancy; lifetime costs

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30806569     DOI: 10.1177/1352458519831213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mult Scler        ISSN: 1352-4585            Impact factor:   6.312


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Unenhanced and Gadolinium-Enhanced Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis: Is Contrast Needed for Routine Follow-Up MRI?

Authors:  G Sadigh; A M Saindane; A D Waldman; N S Lava; R Hu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mehdi Rezaee; Mohammad Hossein Morowvat; Maryam Poursadeghfard; Armin Radgoudarzi; Khosro Keshavarz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Nursing Interventions Focusing on Self-efficacy for Patients With Multiple Sclerosis in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rouven Brenner; Verena Witzig-Brändli; Janine Vetsch; Myrta Kohler
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Does the inclusion of societal costs change the economic evaluations recommendations? A systematic review for multiple sclerosis disease.

Authors:  B Rodríguez-Sánchez; S Daugbjerg; L M Peña-Longobardo; J Oliva-Moreno; I Aranda-Reneo; A Cicchetti; J López-Bastida
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-05-20

5.  Age-period-cohort analysis of the incidence of multiple sclerosis over twenty years in Lorraine, France.

Authors:  Brigitte Gbaguidi; Francis Guillemin; Marc Soudant; Marc Debouverie; Guillaume Mathey; Jonathan Epstein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.