Literature DB >> 30805789

Use of magnets in gastrointestinal surgery.

Ramon Diaz1, Gerardo Davalos1, Leonard K Welsh1, Dana Portenier1, Alfredo D Guerron2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery has undergone vast progress during the last 2 decades, translating into improved patient outcomes. A prime example of this development is the use of magnetic devices in gastrointestinal surgery. Magnetic devices have been developed and implemented for both laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery, providing alternatives for retraction, anchoring, and compression among other critical surgical steps. The purpose of this review is to explore the use of magnetic devices in gastrointestinal surgery, and describe different magnetic technologies, current applications, and future directions.
METHODS: IRB approval and written consent were not required. In this review of the existing literature, we offer a critical examination at the use of magnets for gastrointestinal surgery currently described. We show the experiences done to date, the benefits in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery, and additional future implications.
RESULTS: Magnetic devices have been tested in the field of gastrointestinal surgery, both in the contexts of animal and human experimentation. Magnets have been mainly used for retraction, anchoring, mobilization, and anastomosis.
CONCLUSION: Research into the use of magnets in gastrointestinal surgery offers promising results. The integration of these technologies in minimally invasive surgery provides benefits in various procedures. However, more research is needed to continually evaluate their impact and implementation into surgical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Magnet; Magnetic retraction; Minimally invasive surgery; Single port

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30805789     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06718-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  6 in total

1.  Hybrid fluorescent magnetic gastrojejunostomy: an experimental feasibility study in the porcine model and human cadaver.

Authors:  Ryohei Watanabe; Manuel Barberio; Shingo Kanaji; Alfonso Lapergola; Anila Hoskere Ashoka; Bohdan Andreiuk; Ludovica Guerriero; Margherita Pizzicannella; Barbara Seeliger; Yoshihisa Saida; Hironori Kaneko; Marc Worreth; Alend Saadi; Jacques Marescaux; Andrey S Klymchenko; Michele Diana
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The Role of Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Technologies in Morbid Obesity Treatment: Review and Critical Appraisal of the Current Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Francesco Maria Carrano; Miroslav P Peev; John K Saunders; Marcovalerio Melis; Valeria Tognoni; Nicola Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Electromagnetic tool for the endoscopic creation of colon anastomoses-development and feasibility assessment of a novel anastomosis compression implant approach.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Anne Zimmermann; Thomas Wittenberg; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Fedora-type magnetic compression anastomosis device for intestinal anastomosis.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Tao Ma; Yue Wang; Hao-Yang Zhu; Zhe Feng; Rong-Qian Wu; Yi Lv; Ding-Hui Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Magnetic compression anastomosis with atypical anastomosis for anastomotic stenosis of the sigmoid colon: a case report.

Authors:  Teppei Kamada; Hironori Ohdaira; Sojun Hoshimoto; Satoshi Narihiro; Norihiko Suzuki; Rui Marukuchi; Hideyuki Takeuchi; Masashi Yoshida; Eigoro Yamanouchi; Yutaka Suzuki
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-30

Review 6.  Magnetic challenge against gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Mauro Bortolotti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.