Literature DB >> 30805788

Nasal positive pressure with the SuperNO2VA™ device decreases sedation-related hypoxemia during pre-bariatric surgery EGD.

Francesca Dimou1, Samantha Huynh1, Gregory Dakin1, Alfons Pomp1, Zachary Turnbull1, Jon D Samuels1, Cheguevara Afaneh2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pre-operative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is becoming routine practice in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Many patients with morbid obesity have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which can worsen hypoxia during an EGD. In this study, we report our outcomes using the SuperNO2VA™ device, a sealed nasal positive airway pressure mask designed to deliver high-fraction inhaled oxygen and titratable positive pressure compared to conventional nasal cannula.
METHODS: Between June 2016 and August 2017, we conducted a prospective observational study that included 56 consecutive patients who presented for EGD prior to bariatric surgery. Airway management was done using either the SuperNO2VA™ (N = 26) device or conventional nasal cannula (N = 30). Patient demographics, procedure details, and outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The SuperNO2VA™ group had a lower median age compared to the control group (38.5 vs. 48.5 years, p = 0.04). These patients had a higher body mass index (BMI) (47.4 vs. 40.5, IQR, p < 0.0001), higher ASA class (p = 0.03), and were more likely to have OSA (53.9% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.04). Desaturation events were significantly lower in the SuperNO2VA™ group (11.5% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.004) and the median lowest oxygen saturation was higher in the SuperNO2VA™ group (100% vs. 90.5%, p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: This is the first study to report on the use of the SuperNO2VA™ device in bariatric patients undergoing pre-operative screening EGD. The use of the SuperNO2VA™ device offers a clinical advantage compared to the current standard of care. Our data demonstrate that patients with higher BMI, higher ASA classification, and OSA were more likely to have the SuperNO2VA™ device used; yet, paradoxically, these patients were less likely to have issues with desaturation events. Use of this device can optimize care in this challenging patient population by minimizing the risks of hypoventilation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Endoscopy; Hypoxemia; Obesity; Obstructive sleep apnea

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30805788     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06721-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Capnographic monitoring of propofol-based sedation during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Maria Welte; Carmen Welte; Joerg Albert; Yvonne Meckbach; Eva Herrmann; Matthias Kannengiesser; Joerg Trojan; Natalie Filmann; Hartmut Schroeter; Stefan Zeuzem; Joerg Bojunga
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Risk factors associated with changes in oxygenation and pulse rate during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Mustafa Yilmaz; Ahmet Aydin; Zeki Karasu; Fulya Günşar; Omer Ozütemiz
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Capnographic Monitoring in Routine EGD and Colonoscopy With Moderate Sedation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Paresh P Mehta; Gursimran Kochhar; Mazen Albeldawi; Brian Kirsh; Maged Rizk; Brian Putka; Binu John; Yinghong Wang; Nicole Breslaw; Rocio Lopez; John J Vargo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy.

Authors:  Dayna S Early; Jenifer R Lightdale; John J Vargo; Ruben D Acosta; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Krishnavel V Chathadi; John A Evans; Deborah A Fisher; Lisa Fonkalsrud; Joo Ha Hwang; Mouen A Khashab; V Raman Muthusamy; Shabana F Pasha; John R Saltzman; Amandeep K Shergill; Brooks D Cash; John M DeWitt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté; Robert M Hovis; Michael A Ansstas; Lawrence Waldbaum; Riad R Azar; Dayna S Early; Steven A Edmundowicz; Daniel K Mullady; Sreenivasa S Jonnalagadda
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 7.  Role of endoscopy in the bariatric surgery of patients.

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma; Pietro Forestieri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE): a physiological method of increasing apnoea time in patients with difficult airways.

Authors:  A Patel; S A R Nouraei
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  High-flow nasal oxygen availability for sedation decreases the use of general anesthesia during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Roman Schumann; Nikola S Natov; Klifford A Rocuts-Martinez; Matthew D Finkelman; Tom V Phan; Sanjay R Hegde; Robert M Knapp
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Recent Developments in Devices Used for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Sedation.

Authors:  Basavana Goudra; Gowri Gouda; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-03-18

2.  LMA® Gastro™ Airway for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a retrospective observational analysis.

Authors:  Andre Tran; Venkatesan Thiruvenkatarajan; Medhat Wahba; John Currie; Anand Rajbhoj; Roelof van Wijk; Edward Teo; Mark Lorenzetti; Guy Ludbrook
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.