| Literature DB >> 30805542 |
Abdulaziz Almutairi1, Ziyad Alkathiri1, Sulaiman M Al-Mayouf1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children with lupus nephritis particularly, diffuse proliferative and membranous glomerulonephritis, may necessitate potent immunosuppressive medications and occasionally combined therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Lupus nephritis; Nephrotic syndrome; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Tacrolimus
Year: 2018 PMID: 30805542 PMCID: PMC6363263 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2018.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med ISSN: 2352-6467
Baseline clinical and laboratory findings of three patients with refractory lupus nephritis.
| Case I | Case II | Case III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Years)/Gender | 13/Female | 12/Female | 14/Male |
| Age at onset (SLE) (Years) | 8 | 11 | 8 |
| Lupus nephritis (ISN/RPS) | IV | IV | IV/V |
| Extra-renal | Mucocutaneous | Hematological | Mucocutaneous |
| Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal | ||
| Hematological | Hematological | ||
| Urine Pr/Cr ratio (mg/mmol) | 424 | 120 | 629 |
| Urine sediments | 5 RBC, 5 WBC+ Hyaline cast | Negative | >50 RBC, 5 WBC+ Granular cast |
| C3 g/L (0.9–1.8) | 0.79 | 1 | 0.8 |
| C4 g/L (0.1–0.4) | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| eGFR min/ml/1.73 m2 | 157 | 43 | 162 |
| Serum albumin mg/L | 30 | 34 | 27 |
| Anti-dsDNA antibody (<200) | 1280 | Negative | 456 |
| Daily Steroid dose (mg) | 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Previous medications | MMF, RTX, CYC, IVIG | MMF, RTX, CYC, IVIG | MMF, RTX, CYC, IVIG |
| SLEDAI | 9 | 4 | 14 |
C3, complement 3; C4, Complement 4; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; AZZ, azathioprine; CYC, cyclophosphamide; RTX, rituximab; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; SLEDAI, systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index.
Urine protein/creatinine ratio (<30 mg/mmol).
Fig. 1Changes in urine protein/creatinine ratio during the treatment period.
Summarized results of response to tacrolimus during the follow-up period.
| Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | Last follow-up visit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case I | 424 | 127 | 18 | 70 |
| Case II | 126 | 69 | 23 | 37 |
| Case III | 629 | 76 | 62 | 49 |
| Case I | 0.76/0.3 | 0.76/0.28 | 0.9/0.39 | 0.9/0.2 |
| Case II | 1.0/0.46 | 1.1/0.48 | 0.9/0.37 | 1.0/0.4 |
| Case III | 0.8/0.1 | 1.05/0.1 | 1.22/0.13 | 1.37/0.21 |
| Case I | 157 | 130 | – | 165 |
| Case II | 43 | 51 | 49 | 52 |
| Case III | 206 | 260 | 230 | 239 |
| Case I | 30 | 36.8 | 40 | 40 |
| Case II | 34 | 39 | 43 | 44 |
| Case III | 19 | 28 | 41 | 42 |
| Patient I | 1280 | – | – | 348 |
| Patient II | – | – | – | – |
| Patient III | 456 | – | 296 | – |
| Case I | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Case II | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Case III | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Case I | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Case II | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Case III | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
C3, complement 3; C4, Complement 4; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; SLEDAI, systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index.