Literature DB >> 30805282

Thoracolumbar Fusion in Extreme Obesity: Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Jacob R Joseph1, Jennifer Neva1, Brandon W Smith1, Mary O Strasser1, Paul Park1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extreme obesity (class III) is defined by the Centers for Disease Control as a body mass index (BMI) value ≥40. Recent studies suggest that obese patients have poor outcomes after thoracolumbar spinal fusions. The objective of this study was to analyze 30-day adverse events and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of spinal fusion surgeries performed at a single institution from 2006 to 2016 was executed. All patients had a preoperative BMI ≥40. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and others, were collected. Thirty-day adverse events (complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality) and PROs (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and visual analog scale [VAS]) were recorded.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were identified, including 30 men (54%). Mean age was 55.7 years (range, 31-74 years). Mean BMI was 44.2 (range, 40.0-54.7). Mean ASA was 2.7 (range, 2-3), and mean CCI was 1.1 (range, 0-6). Mean number of fused levels was 2.3 (range, 1-14). Mean length of stay was 4.4 ± 2.1 days. Mean number of complications was 0.7 ± 1.1, with 30.4% of patients having had at least 1 complication. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was 5.4%, and 30-day reoperation rate was 3.6%. For 30 patients (54%) with 1-year PROs, mean preoperative ODI was 65.2 ± 11.1, and mean preoperative VAS was 6.6 ± 1.6. Mean ODI change was -19.9 ± 20.1 (P < .001), and mean VAS change was -2.6 ± 2.3 (P < .001). A total of 15 patients (50%) achieved the minimum clinically important difference in ODI (12.8), with a mean follow-up of 18.9 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with extreme obesity who undergo thoracolumbar fusion have acceptable 30-day adverse events and potentially can achieve significant improvement in pain and disability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  class III obesity; extreme obesity; obesity; patient-reported outcomes; spinal fusion; spine surgery complications; thoracolumbar fusion

Year:  2019        PMID: 30805282      PMCID: PMC6383459          DOI: 10.14444/6003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  18 in total

1.  Impact of increased body mass index on outcomes of elective spinal surgery.

Authors:  Andreea Seicean; Nima Alan; Sinziana Seicean; Marta Worwag; Duncan Neuhauser; Edward C Benzel; Robert J Weil
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Limitations of administrative databases in spine research: a study in obesity.

Authors:  Nicholas S Golinvaux; Daniel D Bohl; Bryce A Basques; Michael C Fu; Elizabeth C Gardner; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Obese Class III patients at significantly greater risk of multiple complications after lumbar surgery: an analysis of 10,387 patients in the ACS NSQIP database.

Authors:  Rafael A Buerba; Michael C Fu; Jordan A Gruskay; William D Long; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  The impact of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Rafael De la Garza-Ramos; Mohamad Bydon; Nicholas B Abt; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ali Bydon; Ziya L Gokaslan; Bruce Rabin; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Body mass index as a predictor of complications and mortality after lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Alejandro Marquez-Lara; Sreeharsha V Nandyala; Sriram Sankaranarayanan; Mohamed Noureldin; Kern Singh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Steven D Glassman; Brian R Subach; Sigurd Berven; Thomas C Schuler; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Anne G Copay; Sigurd H Berven; David W Polly; Brian R Subach; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Mladen Djurasovic; Kelly R Bratcher; Steven D Glassman; John R Dimar; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.

Authors:  Samuel W Terman; Timothy J Yee; Darryl Lau; Adam A Khan; Frank La Marca; Paul Park
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-04-18

10.  Does obesity affect surgical outcomes in degenerative scoliosis?

Authors:  Lingjie Fu; Michael S Chang; Dennis G Crandall; Jan Revella
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.