| Literature DB >> 30804909 |
Jeffrey M Dick1,2, Miao Yu1,2, Jingqiang Tan1,2, Anhuai Lu1,2,3.
Abstract
There is widespread interest in how geochemistry affects the genomic makeup of microbial communities, but the possible impacts of oxidation-reduction (redox) conditions on the chemical composition of biomacromolecules remain largely unexplored. Here we document systematic changes in the carbon oxidation state, a metric derived from the chemical formulas of biomacromolecular sequences, using published metagenomic and metatranscriptomic datasets from 18 studies representing different marine and terrestrial environments. We find that the carbon oxidation states of DNA, as well as proteins inferred from coding sequences, follow geochemical redox gradients associated with mixing and cooling of hot spring fluids in Yellowstone National Park (USA) and submarine hydrothermal fluids. Thermodynamic calculations provide independent predictions for the environmental shaping of the gene and protein composition of microbial communities in these systems. On the other hand, the carbon oxidation state of DNA is negatively correlated with oxygen concentration in marine oxygen minimum zones. In this case, a thermodynamic model is not viable, but the low carbon oxidation state of DNA near the ocean surface reflects a low GC content, which can be attributed to genome reduction in organisms adapted to low-nutrient conditions. We also present evidence for a depth-dependent increase of oxidation state at the species level, which might be associated with alteration of DNA through horizontal gene transfer and/or selective degradation of relatively reduced (AT-rich) extracellular DNA by heterotrophic bacteria. Sediments exhibit even more complex behavior, where carbon oxidation state minimizes near the sulfate-methane transition zone and rises again at depth; markedly higher oxidation states are also associated with older freshwater-dominated sediments in the Baltic Sea that are enriched in iron oxides and have low organic carbon. This geobiochemical study of carbon oxidation state reveals a new aspect of environmental information in metagenomic sequences, and provides a reference frame for future studies that may use ancient DNA sequences as a paleoredox indicator.Entities:
Keywords: chemical composition; environmental shaping; geobiochemistry; metagenomics; paleoredox; redox gradient; selective degradation; thermodynamics
Year: 2019 PMID: 30804909 PMCID: PMC6378307 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1(A) ZC (Equation 1) of nucleobases (black circles), ribose and deoxyribose (horizontal dotted lines), and nucleosides in RNA and DNA (blue squares and red triangles). The dashed lines indicate the base pairs in DNA. (B) ZC as a function of GC content in double-stranded DNA (red line) and single-stranded RNA assuming equal abundances of G and C and of A and U (blue line). As a thought experiment, the dashed blue line represents hypothetical single-stranded RNA where T takes the place of U; the constant displacement from the red line represents the difference between DNA and RNA that is due only to the substitution of deoxyribose by ribose. (C,D) Scatterplots of ZC of DNA codons (not double-stranded) and corresponding amino acids. Areas of points are proportional to the frequencies of the codons in the indicated organisms, and regression lines are plotted using the frequencies as weighting factors.
Figure 2Carbon oxidation state (ZC) of double-stranded DNA (red symbols), messenger RNA of predicted coding sequences (blue symbols), and proteins (green symbols) along geochemical redox gradients. Separate plots for nucleic acids and proteins are provided for two datasets each for sediment (A-D), hydrothermal vent (E-H), ocean (I-L), hypersaline (M-P), and microbial mat (Q-T) environments. In order to plot both DNA and RNA on the same diagram, a constant of 0.28 was subtracted from ZC of RNA. The horizontal axis in each plot is ordered so that relatively oxidizing conditions are toward the right-hand side. This figure includes selected metagenomic datasets representing different types of environments, as indicated by the row titles. The Mono Lake dataset is a metatranscriptome. Plots for all datasets considered in this study are in Figure S1 (DNA and RNA) and Figure S2 (proteins). Abbreviations for sample names are given in the Appendix.
Figure 3Comparison of mean values of carbon oxidation state (ZC) of DNA and proteins in (A) metagenomes and (B) metatranscriptomes. Dashed lines connect points in the same dataset, ordered by ZC of DNA; this does not necessarily correspond to the spatial order of samples. OMZ, oxygen minimum zone; SW, seawater.
Figure 4Thermodynamic calculations for relative potential for synthesis of DNA and proteins as a function of environmental oxidation-reduction conditions. (A) Thermodynamic potential (chemical affinity) calculated for formation reactions of average monomer compositions of DNA (nucleotide monophosphate base pairs) and proteins (amino acids) at Bison Pool. The x-axis shows the variation of Eh in the calculations. Lines for all 5 samples are present in each plot (red: relatively reducing environment; blue: relatively oxidizing environment) but are nearly indistinguishable from each other. (B) Relative chemical affinity of formation per monomer of DNA and proteins in each sample calculated by subtracting the mean value for all samples from the individual sample values. Red circles on the red lines indicate reducing model conditions for the relatively reducing environments; blue circles and lines correspond to oxidizing conditions. (C) Cross-plots of relative affinity of formation of monomers in DNA and proteins for different metagenomic and metatranscriptomic datasets, starting with Bison Pool. In quadrant I (white), the relative affinities of formation of DNA and proteins are both positive, indicating a viable thermodynamic model.
Figure 5Carbon oxidation state of DNA sequences for individual species in metagenomes from different types of marine environments: (A,B) hydrothermal vents, (C,D) oxygen minimum zones, and (E) relatively oxic ocean gyre. Colors are used to identify species that are present in multiple datasets, small dots indicate species with reads that make up >1% of the total number of classified reads in that sample, and bold lines indicate the entire metagenomes. The horizontal dotted line in the lower plots indicates the average ZC of DNA from Ca. Thioglobus singularis in the vent datasets. The calculations for HOT ALOHA shown here use a more recent and larger dataset than the one shown in Figure S1; see Appendix for description. To avoid clutter from the high density of near-surface samples, depths greater than 500 m at ETSP OMZ and HOT ALOHA are not shown here. Results for the deeper samples are shown in Figure S3. The bold lines in these plots represent entire metagenomes (after cleaning and dereplication), which are larger than the partial datasets used to make Figure 2 and Figures S1, S2; the only significant difference is the higher ZC apparent here for the 10 cm Menez Gwen sample.
Major taxonomic groups in datasets where carbon oxidation states of DNA and proteins are positively correlated with the geochemical redox gradient.
| Baltic Sea Sediment (Thureborn et al., | Euryarchaeota, Atribacteria, Chloroflexi | Atribacteria, Euryarchaeota, Chloroflexi, Deltaproteobacteria | Cyanobacteria, Euryarchaeota, Deltaproteobacteria |
| Bison Pool (Dick and Shock, | Aquificae, Crenarchaeota | Deinococcus-Thermus, Firmicutes | Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria |
| Diffuse Vents (Reveillaud et al., | Archaeoglobaceae, Epsilonproteobacteria | Epsilonproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Nitrosopumilus |
| Menez Gwen (Meier et al., | Epsilonproteobacteria, Aquificae | Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria (Rhodobacterales) | Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria (SAR11) |
| Mono Lake (Edwardson and Hollibaugh, | Firmicutes, Proteobacteria (Deltaproteobacteria, Clostridia) | Firmicutes, Proteobacteria (Gammaproteobacteria) | Bacteriodetes, Actinobacteria |
| SYNH Mud Volcano (Cheng et al., | Methanomicrobiales, Methanosarcinales, Deltaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes | Methanomicrobiales, Methanosarcinales, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes | Methanosarcinales, ANME-1, Cyanobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria |
| Serpentinite Springs (Brazelton et al., | Thiomicrospira | Burkholderiales (dominant), Firmicutes | Burkholderiales, Firmicutes |
Taxonomic summaries are taken from the cited references.