| Literature DB >> 30804813 |
Maria Carlota Dao1, Nataliya Sokolovska1, Rémi Brazeilles2, Séverine Affeldt1, Véronique Pelloux1, Edi Prifti3,4, Julien Chilloux5, Eric O Verger1, Brandon D Kayser1, Judith Aron-Wisnewsky1,6, Farid Ichou7, Estelle Pujos-Guillot8, Lesley Hoyles5,9, Catherine Juste10, Joël Doré10, Marc-Emmanuel Dumas5, Salwa W Rizkalla1, Bridget A Holmes2, Jean-Daniel Zucker3,4, Karine Clément1,6.
Abstract
Background: The mechanisms responsible for calorie restriction (CR)-induced improvement in insulin sensitivity (IS) have not been fully elucidated. Greater insight can be achieved through deep biological phenotyping of subjects undergoing CR, and integration of big data. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: data integration; insulin sensitivity; lifestyle factors; microbiota; omics
Year: 2019 PMID: 30804813 PMCID: PMC6371001 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Analysis pipeline for data integration. (A) Groups of variables from host, gut microbiota, and lifestyle were considered as input for this analysis. Specifically, the inputs were changes (week 6 – baseline) in the following blocks of variables: clinical parameters (N = 45), including 10 markers of IS/resistance (), lifestyle factors (food groups, N = 26, nutrients N = 34, and physical activity, N = 3), MGS (N = 741, i.e., with more than 700 genes), fecal metabolic features (N = 835), urine metabolic features (N = 562), serum metabolic features (N = 180), and sAT gene expression (N = 7,560 ILMN probes). (B) Two blocks of variables at a time were analyzed using PLSR with canonical mode (MixOmics R package). We have analyzed changes in versus changes in through , and between and . Association coefficient threshold = | 0.7| was selected for analysis with and , and | 0.75| for analysis with , , and . An example of a PLSR network between blocks and is shown. (C) The associations between and host, microbiota, or lifestyle were interpreted. (D) From the PLSR output, the features most strongly associated with improvement in IS after CR were selected (top 20% variables from each PLSR). (E) Visualization of selected features in network reconstruction using SCS (ScaleNet, developed by our group). In hypothetical network shown in E, red nodes: microbiota; blue nodes: host; green nodes: lifestyle factors. Arrows refer to dependency directionality.
Change in clinical outcomes with calorie restriction.
| Baseline | Week 6 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Number | Median | IQR | Median | IQR | Padj |
| Age | 27 | 41 | 26 | |||
| Sex M | 3 | |||||
| 24 | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27 | 33.9 | 5.8 | 31.9 | 5.9 | |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 27 | 118 | 12 | 114 | 15 | |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 27 | 107 | 14 | 99 | 13 | |
| Waist-to-Hip ratio | 27 | 0.92 | 0.12 | 0.89 | 0.13 | |
| Fat mass (%) | 27 | 42.7 | 6.9 | 41.6 | 6.1 | |
| Fat free mass (%) | 27 | 54.3 | 6.6 | 55.5 | 6.2 | |
| Android fat (%) | 27 | 59.4 | 8.3 | 57.7 | 9.5 | |
| Gynoid fat (%) | 27 | 38.5 | 7.8 | 38.6 | 9.8 | |
| Adipocyte diameter (μm) | 27 | 110.9 | 11.5 | 101.7 | 6.1 | |
| Serum triglycerides (mM) | 27 | 1.08 | 0.63 | 0.82 | 0.53 | |
| NEFA (mM) | 27 | 0.49 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.32 | |
| Cholesterol (mM) | 27 | 5.21 | 1.27 | 4.66 | 1.03 | |
| HDL (mM) | 27 | 1.35 | 0.50 | 1.11 | 0.41 | |
| LDL (mM) | 27 | 3.30 | 0.99 | 2.97 | 0.94 | |
| CRP (mg/L) | 27 | 3.60 | 5.25 | 3.12 | 4.17 | 0.40 |
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 27 | 1.24 | 1.48 | 1.47 | 1.10 | 0.97 |
| Insulin (μUI/ml) | 27 | 8.6 | 5.1 | 5.7 | 3.7 | |
| Glucose (mM) | 27 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 5.0 | 0.4 | |
| Insulin : Glucose | 27 | 1.75 | 0.90 | 1.27 | 0.48 | |
| HOMA2-IR | 27 | 1.15 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.48 | |
| HOMA2-B | 27 | 94.0 | 30.9 | 78.3 | 32.9 | |
| HOMA2-S | 27 | 87.1 | 68.2 | 135.2 | 83.5 | |
| FIRI | 27 | 1.93 | 1.19 | 1.12 | 0.77 | |
| Disse Index | 27 | -6.7 | 4.5 | -4.1 | 6.8 | 0.06 |
| QUICKI | 27 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.37 | 0.04 | |
| Revised QUICKI | 27 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.05 | 0.12 |
Figure 2Association between changes in IS and factors in host, microbiota, and lifestyle. (A,B) Superimposed PLSR networks associated with change in insulin sensitivity (ΔINS. SEN.), where nodes are arranged by (A) betweenness centrality and (B) variable type. The green edges correspond to positive correlations of change and the red edges correspond to negative correlations of change. (C) Summary of variables from host, microbiota, and lifestyle factors associated with ΔINS. SEN. Association coefficient threshold = [0.7] for lifestyle factors, and | 0.75| for metabolomics and sAT gene expression. NA, not annotated; BCAAs, branched chain amino acids; AAAs, aromatic amino acids; AAs, amino acids; MGS, metagenomic species. No association with change in physical activity or food groups was found above the selected threshold.
Figure 3Connection between change in IS, BCAAs and other factors from host, lifestyle, and microbiota. (A) ScaleNet network reconstruction showing how changes in variables most strongly associated with improvements in IS are associated with each other. The green edges correspond to positive correlations of change and the red edges correspond to negative correlations of change. (B) Change from baseline to week 6 in select variables from network (highlighted in orange ellipse on the network in A). When significant, adjusted P-values (BH correction) from Wilcoxon Signed Rank test are shown. (C) Linear regression model, where each section of the pie chart shows the relative contribution of change in selected variables (grouped by class) to change in revised QUICKI and HOMA-B. Variables included in the model were those found in the main cluster of the network in part A (except serum metabolic features annotated as glucose). MGS, metagenomic species; metab., metabolic features; DDRGK1, DDRGK domain containing 1 (also known as Dashurin).