| Literature DB >> 30804703 |
Yukako Kaneshiro1, Khamphang Sourinphoumy2, Naoki Imaizumi3, Mangkhalar Rasaphon2, Megumi Kuba-Miyara1, Shugo Sakihama4, Carmina Louise Hugo Guerrero1, Ketsaphone Nhativong5, Daisuke Nonaka6, Tiengkham Pongvongsa5, Jun Kobayashi6, Sengchanh Kounnavong7, Takuya Fukushima1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR), which borders China, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, and Myanmar, the number of HIV-infected patients has increased in recent years. HIV-infected patients diagnosed in Lao PDR are enrolled in a registration network and receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) covered by governmental financial support. Based on the registration network, we investigated intestinal helminth infections and coinfection with HTLV-1 in HIV-infected patients treated with an early intervention using ART in Lao PDR.Entities:
Keywords: Helminth infections; Human T cell leukemia virus type I; Human immunodeficiency virus; Lao People’s Democratic Republic; Registration network
Year: 2019 PMID: 30804703 PMCID: PMC6371529 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-019-0142-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Fig. 1Location of Savannakhet Province (black) in Laos
Fig. 2Workflow of this study
Demographic and general characteristics of the study population (n = 252)
| Sex (male/female) | 138/114 |
| Median age (range), years | 39 (18–59) |
| Ethnic group | |
| Lao Loum | 239 (94.8%) |
| Lao Theung | 5 (2.0%) |
| Phou Thai | 2 (0.8%) |
| Refused to answer | 6 (2.4%) |
| Resident state | |
| Permanent resident | 181 (71.8%) |
| Migrant* | 71 (28.2%) |
| Occupation | |
| Farmer | 129 (51.2%) |
| Merchant and company worker | 74 (29.4%) |
| Government staff | 12 (4.7%) |
| Student | 7 (2.8%) |
| Unemployed | 9 (3.6%) |
| Refused to answer | 21 (8.3%) |
| Educational status | |
| None | 13 (5.2%) |
| Primary | 105 (41.7%) |
| Secondary | 119 (47.2%) |
| College | 1 (0.4%) |
| Refused to answer | 14 (5.5%) |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 55 (21.8%) |
| Married or living with partner | 127 (50.4%) |
| Widowed or separated | 64 (25.4%) |
| Refused to answer | 6 (2.4%) |
| Infection route | |
| Sexual intercourse | 239 (94.8%) |
| Mother-to-child transmission | 5 (2.0%) |
| Unknown | 8 (3.2%) |
| Number of CD4-positive T cells (cells/μL) | |
| < 200 | 43 (17.1%) |
| ≥ 200 | 156 (61.9%) |
| No data | 53 (21.0%) |
| HIV viral load (copies/mL) | |
| < 250 | 146 (57.9%) |
| ≥ 250 | 12 (4.8%) |
| No data | 94 (37.3%) |
| History of tuberculosis | |
| Positive | 89 (38.4%) |
| Negative | 143 (61.6%) |
*Migrant worker: Laotian living and working in Thailand but receiving medical care in Savannakhet Province, Lao PDR
Prevalence of intestinal helminths according to age, sex, and occupation in HIV-infected patients (n = 212)
|
| Helminth infection | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Infected (%) | Uninfected (%) | ||
| Sex | |||
| Male | 116 | 38 (32.8%) | 78 (67.2%) |
| Female | 96 | 37 (38.5%) | 59 (61.5%) |
| Age, years | |||
| 18–19 | 5 | 2 (40.0%) | 3 (60.0%) |
| 20–29 | 35 | 10 (28.6%) | 25 (71.4%) |
| 30–39 | 70 | 18 (25.7%) | 52 (74.3%) |
| 40–49 | 84 | 33 (39.3%) | 51 (60.7%) |
| 50–59 | 18 | 12 (66.7%) | 6 (33.3%) |
| Occupation | |||
| Farmer | 110 | 41 (37.3%) | 69 (62.7%) |
| Marchant and company worker | 59 | 21 (35.6%) | 38 (64.4%) |
| Government staff | 11 | 2 (18.2%) | 9 (81.8%) |
| Students | 7 | 2 (28.6%) | 5 (71.4%) |
| Unemployed | 8 | 2 (25.0%) | 6 (75.0%) |
| Refused to answer | 17 | 7 (41.2%) | 10 (58.8%) |
The overall results of detected helminth infections among 212 HIV-infected patients
| Species | Number of patients |
|---|---|
| Single infection | |
| | 24 (11.3%) |
| | 18 (8.5%) |
| Hookworm | 17 (8.0%) |
| | 4 (1.9%) |
| Double infection | |
| | 4 (1.9%) |
| | 4 (1.9%) |
| | 3 (1.4%) |
| | 1 (0.5%) |
Association of intestinal helminths with the CD4-positive T cell count in HIV-infected patients (n = 199; among the participants who were screened for helminths via stool samples, only 199 had available CD4-positive T cell count data)
| Species | CD4-positive T cell count (cells/μL) | OR (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 200 ( | ≥ 200 ( | |||||
| Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | |||
| Any helminths | 14 (32.6%) | 29 (67.4%) | 56 (35.9%) | 100 (64.1%) | 0.86 (0.42–1.77) | 0.72 |
| | 5 (11.6%) | 38 (88.4%) | 28 (17.9%) | 128 (82.1%) | 0.60 (0.22–1.67) | 0.49 |
| | 4 (9.3%) | 39 (90.7%) | 16 (10.3%) | 140 (89.7%) | 0.90 (0.28–2.84) | 1.00 |
| Hookworm | 6 (14.0%) | 37 (86.0%) | 16 (10.3%) | 140 (89.7%) | 1.42 (0.52–3.88) | 0.58 |
| | 1 (2.3%) | 42 (97.7%) | 6 (3.8%) | 150 (96.2%) | 0.60 (0.07–5.08) | 1.00 |
Association of intestinal helminths with HIV viral load in HIV-infected patients (n = 158; among the participants who were screened for helminths via stool samples, only 158 had available HIV viral load data)
| Species | HIV viral load (copies)/mL | OR (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 250 ( | ≥ 250 ( | |||||
| Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | |||
| Any helminth | 52 (35.6%) | 94 (64.4%) | 3 (25.0%) | 9 (75%) | 0.60 (0.16–2.32) | 0.54 |
| | 25 (17.1%) | 121 (82.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (100%) | n.a. | 0.22 |
| | 14 (9.6%) | 132 (90.4%) | 1 (8.3%) | 11 (91.7%) | 0.86 (0.10–7.14) | 1.00 |
| Hookworm | 17 (11.6%) | 129 (88.4%) | 2 (16.7%) | 10 (83.3%) | 1.52 (0.31–7.52) | 0.64 |
| | 5 (3.4%) | 141 (96.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (100%) | n.a. | 1.00 |
n.a. not applicable