Literature DB >> 30804531

Optimality and heuristics in perceptual neuroscience.

Justin L Gardner1.   

Abstract

The foundation for modern understanding of how we make perceptual decisions about what we see or where to look comes from considering the optimal way to perform these behaviors. While statistical computation is useful for deriving the optimal solution to a perceptual problem, optimality requires perfect knowledge of priors and often complex computation. Accumulating evidence, however, suggests that optimal perceptual goals can be achieved or approximated more simply by human observers using heuristic approaches. Perceptual neuroscientists captivated by optimal explanations of sensory behaviors will fail in their search for the neural circuits and cortical processes that implement an optimal computation whenever that behavior is actually achieved through heuristics. This article provides a cross-disciplinary review of decision-making with the aim of building perceptual theory that uses optimality to set the computational goals for perceptual behavior but, through consideration of ecological, computational, and energetic constraints, incorporates how these optimal goals can be achieved through heuristic approximation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30804531     DOI: 10.1038/s41593-019-0340-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  86 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Decision processes in perception.

Authors:  J SWETS; W P TANNER; T G BIRDSALL
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  A decision-making theory of visual detection.

Authors:  W P TANNER; J A SWETS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  On the psychometric function for contrast detection.

Authors:  J Nachmias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  On the equivalence of two recognition measures of short-term memory.

Authors:  D M Green; F L Moses
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Not noisy, just wrong: the role of suboptimal inference in behavioral variability.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Beck; Wei Ji Ma; Xaq Pitkow; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Visual signal detection. III. On Bayesian use of prior knowledge and cross correlation.

Authors:  A Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  11 in total

1.  Context effects on probability estimation.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiang Lin; Justin L Gardner; Shih-Wei Wu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 2.  How learning unfolds in the brain: toward an optimization view.

Authors:  Jay A Hennig; Emily R Oby; Darby M Losey; Aaron P Batista; Byron M Yu; Steven M Chase
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Efficient sampling and noisy decisions.

Authors:  Joseph A Heng; Michael Woodford; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Prefrontal cortex represents heuristics that shape choice bias and its integration into future behavior.

Authors:  Gabriela Mochol; Roozbeh Kiani; Rubén Moreno-Bote
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Abrupt darkening under high dynamic range (HDR) luminance invokes facilitation for high-contrast targets and grouping by luminance similarity.

Authors:  Chou P Hung; Chloe Callahan-Flintoft; Paul D Fedele; Kim F Fluitt; Onyekachi Odoemene; Anthony J Walker; Andre V Harrison; Barry D Vaughan; Matthew S Jaswa; Min Wei
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Rational inattention in mice.

Authors:  Nikola Grujic; Jeroen Brus; Denis Burdakov; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  The Future of Collaborative Human-Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making for Mission Planning.

Authors:  Sue E Kase; Chou P Hung; Tomer Krayzman; James Z Hare; B Christopher Rinderspacher; Simon M Su
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-04

8.  Backward and forward neck tilt affects perceptual bias when interpreting ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Fumiaki Sato; Ryoya Shiomoto; Shigeki Nakauchi; Tetsuto Minami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  A flexible readout mechanism of human sensory representations.

Authors:  Daniel Birman; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Probabilistic discrimination of relative stimulus features in mice.

Authors:  Dmitry R Lyamzin; Ryo Aoki; Mohammad Abdolrahmani; Andrea Benucci
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.