Literature DB >> 30804215

Chemoprobe-based assays of histone lysine demethylase 1A target occupation enable in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies of KDM1A inhibitors.

Cristina Mascaró1, Alberto Ortega1, Elena Carceller1, Raquel Ruiz Rodriguez1, Filippo Ciceri1, Serena Lunardi1, Li Yu2, Manuel Hilbert3, Tamara Maes4.   

Abstract

Screening of cellular activity for inhibitors of histone lysine modifiers is most frequently performed indirectly by analyzing changes in the total levels of histone marks targeted by lysine methylases/demethylases. However, inhibition of histone lysine modifiers often leads to local rather than total changes in histone marks. Also, because histone modifications can be modulated by more than one cellular enzyme, it is not always clear whether changes in histone marks are a direct or indirect consequence of the inhibitor treatment applied. Direct assessment of target occupation can provide a useful tool to quantify the fraction of an epigenetic modifier that is bound to a pharmacological inhibitor (target engagement). Here, we developed and used a novel chemoprobe-based immunoassay to quantify target engagement in cells. Quantification of the fraction of free KDM1A was made possible, in an immune-based assay, by coupling a biotinylated chemoprobe to a warhead capable of selectively and irreversibly binding to the free active form of KDM1A. The results obtained confirmed that this approach is able to determine the degree of target engagement in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the assay can be also used on tissue extracts to analyze the in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics relationship of KDM1A inhibitors, as has been exemplified with ORY-1001 (iadademstat), a potent and irreversible inhibitor of KDM1A. The principle of this assay may be applied to other targets, and the KDM1A probe may be employed in chemoproteomic analyses.
© 2019 Mascaró et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FAD; chemoprobe; chemoproteomics; chromatin modification; drug development; enzyme inactivation; epigenetics; histone demethylase; histone lysine demethylase (KDM); lysine demethylase; pharmacokinetics; protein-drug interaction; target engagement; translational studies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30804215      PMCID: PMC6527171          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  22 in total

1.  Activity-based probes for proteomic profiling of histone deacetylase complexes.

Authors:  Cleo M Salisbury; Benjamin F Cravatt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Histone H3 lysine 4 demethylation is a target of nonselective antidepressive medications.

Authors:  Min Gyu Lee; Christopher Wynder; Dawn M Schmidt; Dewey G McCafferty; Ramin Shiekhattar
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2006-06

3.  Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins.

Authors:  Yu-ichi Tsukada; Jia Fang; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Maria E Warren; Christoph H Borchers; Paul Tempst; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation is mediated by Set1 and required for cell growth and rDNA silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S D Briggs; M Bryk; B D Strahl; W L Cheung; J K Davie; S Y Dent; F Winston; C D Allis
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  ORY-1001, a Potent and Selective Covalent KDM1A Inhibitor, for the Treatment of Acute Leukemia.

Authors:  Tamara Maes; Cristina Mascaró; Iñigo Tirapu; Angels Estiarte; Filippo Ciceri; Serena Lunardi; Nathalie Guibourt; Alvaro Perdones; Michele M P Lufino; Tim C P Somervaille; Dan H Wiseman; Cihangir Duy; Ari Melnick; Christophe Willekens; Alberto Ortega; Marc Martinell; Nuria Valls; Guido Kurz; Matthew Fyfe; Julio Cesar Castro-Palomino; Carlos Buesa
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Chemoproteomics profiling of HDAC inhibitors reveals selective targeting of HDAC complexes.

Authors:  Marcus Bantscheff; Carsten Hopf; Mikhail M Savitski; Antje Dittmann; Paola Grandi; Anne-Marie Michon; Judith Schlegl; Yann Abraham; Isabelle Becher; Giovanna Bergamini; Markus Boesche; Manja Delling; Birgit Dümpelfeld; Dirk Eberhard; Carola Huthmacher; Toby Mathieson; Daniel Poeckel; Valérie Reader; Katja Strunk; Gavain Sweetman; Ulrich Kruse; Gitte Neubauer; Nigel G Ramsden; Gerard Drewes
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  High-throughput virtual screening identifies novel N'-(1-phenylethylidene)-benzohydrazides as potent, specific, and reversible LSD1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Venkataswamy Sorna; Emily R Theisen; Bret Stephens; Steven L Warner; David J Bearss; Hariprasad Vankayalapati; Sunil Sharma
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Structural basis for the inhibition of the LSD1 histone demethylase by the antidepressant trans-2-phenylcyclopropylamine.

Authors:  Maojun Yang; Jeffrey C Culhane; Lawrence M Szewczuk; Pegah Jalili; Haydn L Ball; Mischa Machius; Philip A Cole; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Chemoproteomics reveals time-dependent binding of histone deacetylase inhibitors to endogenous repressor complexes.

Authors:  Isabelle Becher; Antje Dittmann; Mikhail M Savitski; Carsten Hopf; Gerard Drewes; Marcus Bantscheff
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 5.100

10.  Towards the development of activity-based probes for detection of lysine-specific demethylase-1 activity.

Authors:  Maria E Ourailidou; Alessia Lenoci; Clemens Zwergel; Dante Rotili; Antonello Mai; Frank J Dekker
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pharmacologic inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 1 as a therapeutic and immune-sensitization strategy in pediatric high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Cavan P Bailey; Mary Figueroa; Achintyan Gangadharan; Yanwen Yang; Megan M Romero; Bridget A Kennis; Sridevi Yadavilli; Verlene Henry; Tiara Collier; Michelle Monje; Dean A Lee; Linghua Wang; Javad Nazarian; Vidya Gopalakrishnan; Wafik Zaky; Oren J Becher; Joya Chandra
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  A chemoprobe tracks its target.

Authors:  Aseem Z Ansari
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Comprehensive in Vitro Characterization of the LSD1 Small Molecule Inhibitor Class in Oncology.

Authors:  Natalia Sacilotto; Paola Dessanti; Michele M P Lufino; Alberto Ortega; Alejandra Rodríguez-Gimeno; Jordi Salas; Tamara Maes; Carlos Buesa; Cristina Mascaró; Robert Soliva
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-11-12

4.  Predicting In Vivo Efficacy from In Vitro Data: Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling for an Epigenetic Modifier Drug in Cancer.

Authors:  Mehdi Bouhaddou; Li J Yu; Serena Lunardi; Spyros K Stamatelos; Fiona Mack; James M Gallo; Marc R Birtwistle; Antje-Christine Walz
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Antiviral Properties of the LSD1 Inhibitor SP-2509.

Authors:  Mitchell R Harancher; Jessica E Packard; Shane P Cowan; Neal A DeLuca; Jill A Dembowski
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.103

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.