Literature DB >> 30804192

Expert assessments of the cost and expected future performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for vehicles.

Michael M Whiston1, Inês L Azevedo1, Shawn Litster2, Kate S Whitefoot1,2, Constantine Samaras3, Jay F Whitacre4,5,6.   

Abstract

Despite decades of development, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) still lack wide market acceptance in vehicles. To understand the expected trajectories of PEMFC attributes that influence adoption, we conducted an expert elicitation assessment of the current and expected future cost and performance of automotive PEMFCs. We elicited 39 experts' assessments of PEMFC system cost, stack durability, and stack power density under a hypothetical, large-scale production scenario. Experts assessed the median 2017 automotive cost to be $75/kW, stack durability to be 4,000 hours, and stack power density to be 2.5 kW/L. However, experts ranged widely in their assessments. Experts' 2017 best cost assessments ranged from $40 to $500/kW, durability assessments ranged from 1,200 to 12,000 hours, and power density assessments ranged from 0.5 to 4 kW/L. Most respondents expected the 2020 cost to fall short of the 2020 target of the US Department of Energy (DOE). However, most respondents anticipated that the DOE's ultimate target of $30/kW would be met by 2050 and a power density of 3 kW/L would be achieved by 2035. Fifteen experts thought that the DOE's ultimate durability target of 8,000 hours would be met by 2050. In general, experts identified high Pt group metal loading as the most significant barrier to reducing cost. Recommended research and development (R&D) funding was allocated to "catalysts and electrodes," followed in decreasing amount by "fuel cell performance and durability," "membranes and electrolytes," and "testing and technical assessment." Our results could be used to inform public and private R&D decisions and technology roadmaps.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost; durability; expert elicitation; fuel cell electric vehicle; power density

Year:  2019        PMID: 30804192      PMCID: PMC6421432          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1804221116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  Subsize Pt-based intermetallic compound enables long-term cyclic mass activity for fuel-cell oxygen reduction.

Authors:  Han Cheng; Renjie Gui; Hao Yu; Chun Wang; Si Liu; Hongfei Liu; Tianpei Zhou; Nan Zhang; Xusheng Zheng; Wangsheng Chu; Yue Lin; HengAn Wu; Changzheng Wu; Yi Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Superior Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Performance Using Short-Side-Chain Perfluorosulfonic Acid (PFSA) Membrane and Ionomer.

Authors:  Nana Zhao; Zhiqing Shi; Francois Girard
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Recovery of expensive Pt/C catalysts from the end-of-life membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane fuel cells.

Authors:  Abha Bharti; Rajalakshmi Natarajan
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Local probe investigation of electrocatalytic activity.

Authors:  N Limani; A Boudet; N Blanchard; B Jousselme; R Cornut
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Optimization of Sulfurization Process of Cobalt Sulfide and Nitrogen Doped Carbon Material for Boosting the Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalytic Activity in Alkaline Medium.

Authors:  Bing-Ye Song; Sen Yao
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.221

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.