Literature DB >> 30803618

Major sources of mercury emissions to the atmosphere: The U.S. case.

A C Thanos Bourtsalas1, Nickolas J Themelis2.   

Abstract

In 1989, the two major sources of mercury emissions to the atmosphere in the U.S. were coal-fired power plants (80 tons Hg) and waste to energy power plants (82 tons Hg). This paper examines what has happened to these two major sources of mercury emissions since 1989. A comparison within the waste management industry is, also, provided. The 2014 total anthropogenic emissions of mercury in the U.S. were 51.8 t. The results of the analysis of emissions by industrial sector showed that the largest source of anthropogenic mercury were coal-fired power plants. Among industrial processes, the ferrous metals recycling and the cement industries were the largest emitters of mercury. With regard to waste-to-energy power plants, all of which, since the nineties, have installed advanced emission control systems, the results have been very satisfactory: The authors obtained mercury emission data from operators of most of the waste-to-energy (WTE) power plants in the US. The results showed that in 2014 the 77 U.S. WTE plants in total emitted 0.4 tons of mercury, corresponding to 0.77% of the U.S. total. This number was one half of that reported by the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) for "municipal waste combustion'' (0.64 t) due to the fact that the NEI survey included incinerators without energy recovery. A 2002 Earth Engineering Center study had shown that the mercury emissions of the U.S. WTE industry decreased from 81.8 t in 1989 to 2.2 t in 2001. The present study showed that between 2001 and 2014 the U.S. WTE industry mercury emissions were reduced further, by a factor of seven.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coal-fired power plants; Emissions; Mercury sources; U.S. inventory; Waste to energy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30803618     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  4 in total

1.  A Data Mining Approach Reveals Chemicals Detected at Higher Levels in Non-Hispanic Black Women Target Preterm Birth Genes and Pathways.

Authors:  Sean M Harris; Justin Colacino; Miatta Buxton; Lauren Croxton; Vy Nguyen; Rita Loch-Caruso; Kelly M Bakulski
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A synthesis of patterns of environmental mercury inputs, exposure and effects in New York State.

Authors:  D C Evers; A K Sauer; D A Burns; N S Fisher; D C Bertok; E M Adams; M E H Burton; C T Driscoll
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Analysis of healthcare waste management in hospitals of Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Authors:  Arthur Couto Neves; Camila Costa Maia; Maria Esther de Castro E Silva; Gisele Vidal Vimieiro; Marcos Paulo Gomes Mol
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 4.  Mutagenic, Carcinogenic, and Teratogenic Effect of Heavy Metals.

Authors:  Sukeerthi Dasharathy; Selvam Arjunan; Anusha Maliyur Basavaraju; Vidya Murugasen; Saravanan Ramachandran; Rohini Keshav; Rajadurai Murugan
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.