Literature DB >> 30803534

Regenerative Endodontics: A Scientometric and Bibliometric Analysis.

Sayna Shamszadeh1, Saeed Asgary2, Ali Nosrat3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Scientometric analyses outline the research output in a field and, therefore, help researchers and funding agencies to focus more on underinvestigated areas and make more efficient decisions related to public health. The aim of this study was
METHODS: Electronic searches were done in MEDLINE and Scopus databases using specified search criteria. All articles related to the field of regenerative endodontics until December 2017 were included. The total number of publication/year and the yearly growth rate of publications were calculated. The following data were extracted and analyzed: authors, country of origin, journal, number of citations, study design, and level of evidence (LOE). The visualization maps for authorship/coauthorship, citations, and country of origin of articles were prepared and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 694 articles were included. The average yearly growth for publications was 40.4% between 2007 and 2017. The highest number of articles were ex vivo/in vitro (n = 342, 49.27%). The distribution of articles based on LOE was as follows: LOE 1, 8.34%; LOE 2, 6.00%; LOE 3, 0.66%; LOE 4, 11.67%; and LOE 5, 73.33%. Collectively, 1820 authors contributed to the publications included in this study: 1001 authors within 40 collaborating clusters and 819 authors within 149 noncollaborating clusters. The United Sates was the lead country regarding the number of publications, citations, and international collaborations. The Journal of Endodontics published the highest number of articles.
CONCLUSIONS: The total number of publications in the field of regenerative endodontics shows exponential growth in the past decade. However, the proportion of articles with LOE 1 is low. The research groups around the globe are encouraged to focus their collaborative efforts on higher-quality and clinically oriented research.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bibliometric analysis; pulp regeneration; regenerative endodontics; scientometric analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30803534     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  5 in total

Review 1.  Scientific production on silicate-based endodontic materials: evolution and current state: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Julia Guerrero-Gironés; Leopoldo Forner; José Luis Sanz; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; James Ghilotti; Carmen Llena; Adrián Lozano; María Melo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 2.  Scholarly Output in Peruvian National Dentistry according to Gender Disparity: A 10-Year Bibliometric Study.

Authors:  Frank Mayta-Tovalino; Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza; Daniel Alvitez-Temoche; Roman Mendoza; Franco Mauricio; John Barja-Ore; Maria Eugenia Guerrero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Ten years of minimally invasive access cavities in Endodontics: a bibliometric analysis of the 25 most-cited studies.

Authors:  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva; Karem Paula Pinto; Natasha C Ajuz; Luciana Moura Sassone
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-07-21

4.  Trends and frontiers of research on pharmacoeconomics from 2012-2021: a scientometric analysis.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Zhenyan Bo; Dan Liu; Sha Diao; Chunsong Yang; Hailong Li; Linan Zeng; Qin Yu; Lingli Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-03

Review 5.  India's contribution to regenerative endodontics: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Arunakshi Krishnan; Aakriti Saini; Sidhartha Sharma; Vijay Kumar; Amrita Chawla; Ajay Logani
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2021-01-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.