Tyler B Wray1, Ashley E Pérez2, Mark A Celio1, Daniel J Carr1, Alexander C Adia1, Peter M Monti1. 1. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences , Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Geofencing offers new opportunities to study how specific environments affect alcohol use and related behavior. In this study, we examined the feasibility of using geofencing to examine social/environmental factors related to alcohol use and sexual perceptions in a sample of gay and bisexual men (GBM) who engage in heavy drinking and high-risk sex. METHODS: HIV-negative GBM (N = 76) completed ecological momentary assessments for 30 days via a smartphone application and were prompted to complete surveys when inside general geofences set around popular bars and clubs. A subset (N = 45) were also asked to complete surveys when inside personal geofences, which participants set themselves by identifying locations where they typically drank heavily. RESULTS: Approximately 49% of participants received a survey prompted by a general geofence. Among those who identified at least 1 personal drinking location, 62.2% received a personal geofence-prompted survey. Of the 175 total location-based surveys, 40.2% occurred when participants were not at the location that was intended to be captured. Participants reported being most able to openly express themselves at gay bars/clubs and private residences, but these locations were also more "sexualized" than general bars/clubs. Participants did not drink more heavily at gay bars/clubs, but did when in locations with more intoxicated patrons or guests. CONCLUSIONS: Geofencing has the potential to improve the validity of studies exploring environmental influences on drinking. However, the high number of "false-positive" prompts we observed suggests that geofences should be used carefully until improvements in precision are more widely available.
BACKGROUND: Geofencing offers new opportunities to study how specific environments affect alcohol use and related behavior. In this study, we examined the feasibility of using geofencing to examine social/environmental factors related to alcohol use and sexual perceptions in a sample of gay and bisexual men (GBM) who engage in heavy drinking and high-risk sex. METHODS: HIV-negative GBM (N = 76) completed ecological momentary assessments for 30 days via a smartphone application and were prompted to complete surveys when inside general geofences set around popular bars and clubs. A subset (N = 45) were also asked to complete surveys when inside personal geofences, which participants set themselves by identifying locations where they typically drank heavily. RESULTS: Approximately 49% of participants received a survey prompted by a general geofence. Among those who identified at least 1 personal drinking location, 62.2% received a personal geofence-prompted survey. Of the 175 total location-based surveys, 40.2% occurred when participants were not at the location that was intended to be captured. Participants reported being most able to openly express themselves at gay bars/clubs and private residences, but these locations were also more "sexualized" than general bars/clubs. Participants did not drink more heavily at gay bars/clubs, but did when in locations with more intoxicated patrons or guests. CONCLUSIONS: Geofencing has the potential to improve the validity of studies exploring environmental influences on drinking. However, the high number of "false-positive" prompts we observed suggests that geofences should be used carefully until improvements in precision are more widely available.
Authors: G L Greenwood; E W White; K Page-Shafer; E Bein; D H Osmond; J Paul; R D Stall Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2001-01-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Kaylin T Nguyen; Jeffrey E Olgin; Mark J Pletcher; Madelena Ng; Leanne Kaye; Sai Moturu; Rachel A Gladstone; Chaitanya Malladi; Amy H Fann; Carol Maguire; Laura Bettencourt; Matthew A Christensen; Gregory M Marcus Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2017-03
Authors: Hilary F Byrnes; Brenda A Miller; Douglas J Wiebe; Christopher N Morrison; Lillian G Remer; Sarah E Wiehe Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Petra M Sander; Stephen R Cole; Ronald D Stall; Lisa P Jacobson; Joseph J Eron; Sonia Napravnik; Bradley N Gaynes; Lisette M Johnson-Hill; Robert K Bolan; David G Ostrow Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: John D Clapp; Jong Won Min; Audrey M Shillington; Mark B Reed; Julie Ketchie Croff Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Gede Pramana; Bambang Parmanto; James Lomas; Oliver Lindhiem; Philip C Kendall; Jennifer Silk Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 4.143
Authors: Christina Mair; Jessica Frankeberger; Paul J Gruenewald; Christopher N Morrison; Bridget Freisthler Journal: Curr Epidemiol Rep Date: 2019-09-13