Literature DB >> 3080076

Can the prevalence of disease risk factors be assessed from general practice records?

D Mant, A Phillips.   

Abstract

The result of an audit of the recording of smoking habit, alcohol consumption, blood pressure level, diet, exercise, height, weight, and occupation in patients in five general practices is reported. This audit was the first phase of a study to assess the feasibility of the exchange of information between general practice and a district health authority. The frequency with which each item was recorded varied from 3% (exercise) to 65% (blood pressure) in a five year period. The sample of patients upon whom a recording had been made was shown to be unrepresentative of the practice population: this presents a difficulty in using general practice records to estimate the prevalence of risk factors for disease in the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3080076      PMCID: PMC1339118          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.292.6513.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of individual and population smoking data from a postal survey and general practice records.

Authors:  A Wilson; T Manku-Scott; D Shepherd; B Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Large computer databases in general practice.

Authors:  M Pringle; R Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-30

3.  Feasibility of contact surveys in general practice.

Authors:  A Phillips; D Mant
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-10-31

4.  A retrospective cohort study on lifestyle habits of cardiovascular patients: how informative are medical records?

Authors:  Annemarie J Fouwels; Sebastiaan J H Bredie; Hub Wollersheim; Gerard M Schippers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Completeness of maternal smoking status recording during pregnancy in United Kingdom primary care data.

Authors:  Nafeesa N Dhalwani; Laila J Tata; Tim Coleman; Kate M Fleming; Lisa Szatkowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.