| Literature DB >> 30800395 |
Luca Rimoldi1,2, Daniela Meroni1,2, Eleonora Pargoletti1,2, Iolanda Biraghi1, Giuseppe Cappelletti1,2, Silvia Ardizzone1,2.
Abstract
TiO2/SnO2 composites have attracted considerable attention for their application in photocatalysis, fuel cells and sensors. Structural, morphological, optical and surface features play a pivotal role in photoelectrochemical applications and are critically related to the synthetic route. Most of the reported synthetic procedures require high-temperature treatments in order to tailor the sample crystallinity, usually at the expense of surface hydroxylation and morphology. In this work, we investigate the role of a treatment in an autoclave at a low temperature (100°C) on the sample properties and photocatalytic performance. With respect to samples calcined at 400°C, the milder crystallization treatment promotes anatase phase, mesoporosity and water chemi/physisorption, while reducing the incorporation of heteroatoms within the TiO2 lattice. The role of Sn content was also investigated, showing a marked influence, especially on the structural properties. Notably, at a high content, Sn favours the formation of rutile TiO2 at very low reaction temperatures (100°C), thanks to the structural compatibility with cassiterite SnO2. Selected samples were tested towards the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline in water under UV light. Overall, the low-temperature treatment enables to tune the TiO2 phase composition while maintaining its surface hydrophilicity and gives rise to well-dispersed SnO2 at the TiO2 surface.Entities:
Keywords: TiO2/SnO2 composite; calcination; hydrothermal treatment; tin oxide; titanium dioxide
Year: 2019 PMID: 30800395 PMCID: PMC6366208 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181662
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.XRPD patterns of samples prepared with the low-temperature treatment. For the sake of comparison, the diffractogram of a calcined sample is reported as a reference, see [5].
Physicochemical parameters of pristine TiO2 and TiO2/SnO2 composites: phase composition (A: anatase, B: brookite, R: rutile) and average crystallite size of the most abundant phase, d, estimated from XRPD analyses; Sn/Ti molar ratios from EDX analyses; specific surface area, SBET, and total pore volume, VPORES; apparent band gap values determined by Kubelka–Munk elaboration, E. A calcined sample is reported as reference, see [5].
| sample | phase composition (%) | Sn/Ti (EDX) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti | 80A–20B | 16 | — | 110 | 0.400 | 3.32 |
| TiSn5 | 96A–4B | 9 | 4 | 163 | 0.341 | 3.24 |
| TiSn20 | 30A–70R | 7 | 23 | 163 | 0.322 | 3.31 |
| TiSn5_400 | 78A–22B | 9 | 4 | 215 | 0.079 | 3.11 |
Figure 2.XPS spectra of TiSn5: Sn 3d region (a) and O 1s region, with relative fitting (b). For the sake of comparison, the spectra of TiSn5_400 are reported, see [5].
Figure 3.N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms in subcritical condition (−196°C) and pore size distribution (inset) of pristine TiO2 and TiO2/SnO2 samples. The curves of a calcined sample are reported for the sake of comparison, see [5].
Figure 4.DRS of pristine TiO2 and TiO2/SnO2 samples; the spectrum of TiSn5_400 is reported as reference, see [5].
Figure 5.FTIR spectra of the prepared samples.
Figure 6.(a) UV–vis spectra of TC solution as a function of irradiation time during photocatalytic tests; (b) comparison of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2/SnO2 composites with same Sn content and different heat treatment method: pseudo first-order kinetic constant (×10−3 min−1) and mineralization degree, normalized by the photocatalyst surface area.