| Literature DB >> 30799883 |
Flavia Domizia Nardi1,2, Christoph Dobeš1, Dorothee Müller2, Tobias Grasegger2, Tuuli Myllynen1, Henar Alonso-Marcos1, Andreas Tribsch2.
Abstract
Apomixis - asexual reproduction via seeds - might arise de novo following polyploidisation events, or via reproductive transfer of apomixis. Both processes can be obtained within species or via hybridisation. We aimed to determine the origin of apomictic genotypes in Potentilla puberula, a rosaceous species showing reproductive differentiation with ploidy: sexual tetraploids and apomictic penta- to octoploids, which regularly co-occur in sympatry. The study is based on 726 individuals, comprising all cytotypes, collected from 138 populations in the Eastern European Alps. We established relationships of cytotypes based on AFLP fingerprinting and cpDNA sequencing to test (1) whether the apomicts are of recurrent allopolyploid origin or originated from within the species via autopolyploidy, and (2) whether there are indications for reproductive transfer versus de novo origin of apomixis. Three principal pathways were identified which explain the origin of new apomictic genotypes, all involving at least one apomictic parent and thus compatible with the idea of reproductive transfer of the apomictic trait to the progeny: (1) self-fertilisation of unreduced egg cells in apomicts; (2) cross-fertilisation among apomicts; and (3) occasionally, heteroploid crosses among sexuals and apomicts. Autopolyploids derived from tetraploid sexuals were repeatedly observed, but did not express apomixis. Finally, our results suggest no role of other species in the origin of extant apomictic genotypes of P. puberula, although local hybrids with P. crantzii were identified. In conclusion, our results show that the formation of new apomictic genotypes required a genetic contribution from at least one apomictic parent. This finding is in accordance with the idea that apomixis is inheritable in P. puberula. On the contrary, lack of apomixis in penta- and hexaploids derived from sexual backgrounds did not support the hypothesis of a de novo origin of apomixis. Relatively high frequency of remnant sexuality in the apomicts involving different cytological pathways of seed formation can explain their high cytological and genotypic diversity. Finally, lack of global introgression from a third taxon is in support of P. puberula as a concise, although highly diverse, species.Entities:
Keywords: AFLP; Potentilla; apomixis; autopolyploidy; cpDNA; origin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30799883 PMCID: PMC6382066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Taxon ISSN: 0040-0262 Impact factor: 2.338
Ploidies and associated reproductive modes in Potentilla L. species studied.
| Species | Ploidy | Reproductive mode | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Sexual | ||
| 6 | Apomictic | ||
| 2 | Sexual | ||
| 2 | Likely sexual | – | |
| 4 | Sexual | ||
| 5–9 | Apomictic | ||
| 4 | Sexual | ||
| 4 | Sexual | ||
| 4 | Sexual | ||
| 4 | Sexual | ||
| 5–8 | Apomictic |
Reproductive pathways of seed formation and their inference.
| Embryo development | Megagametophyte formation | |
|---|---|---|
| Meiosis | Apomeiosis | |
| Fertilisation | Regular sexuality | Irregular sexuality (BIII hybrids formation) |
| P♀ = 1/2 M | P♀ = M | |
| pi < 1.9 | pi < 1.9 | |
| Parthenogenesis | Haploid parthenogenesis | Apomixis |
| P♀ = 1/2 P | P♀ = P | |
| pi > 2.1 | pi > 2.1 | |
M: ploidy of the mother plant; P♀: ploidy of the megagametophyte; pi: peak index.
Association among genetic clusters as defined by a trained STRUCTURE analysis (see text and Fig. 5), ploidy and reproductive mode of seed formation (N = 491a) inferred by FCSS in Potentilla puberula Krašan.
| Genetic cluster | N individuals | N genotypes | N seeds | A | HP | Sreg | Sirreg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 1 (“Tetraploids”) | |||||||
| 4 | 253 | 253 | 95 (236) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 191 (231) | 4 (5) |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 6 | 13 | 13 | 15 (15) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 15 (15) | 0 (0) |
| Admixed | |||||||
| 5 | 9 | 9 | 10 (10) | 4 (4) | 0 (0) | 3 (3) | 3 (3) |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Cluster 2 (“High ploidy”) | |||||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 (2) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) |
| 5 | 225 | 132 | 124 (192) | 119 (185) | 2 (2) | 2 (2) | 1 (3) |
| 6 | 42 | 25 | 20 (67) | 19 (63) | 0 (1) | 1 (2) | 0 (1) |
| 7 | 131 | 84 | 89 (94) | 79 (83) | 1 (1) | 7 (8) | 2 (2) |
| 8 | 45 | 31 | 34 (46) | 25 (37) | 7 (7) | 2 (2) | 0 (0) |
Number of seeds for each reproductive pathway are reported: A: apomixis (apomeiosis and parthenogenesis); HP: haploid parthenogenesis; Sreg: regular sexuality (female meiosis and fertilisation); Sirreg: irregular sexuality (BIII hybrids formation). Numbers out of parentheses refer to measurements within this study only. Numbers in parentheses include both seeds measured within this study and seeds measured by Dobeš & al. (2018)
Ten additional seeds produced by octoploid individuals were found to be parthenogenetically derived, but the exact reproductive pathway (i.e., apomixis vs. haploid parthenogenesis) could not be determined.
Genetic cluster as resulted by the intraspecific STRUCTURE analysis for K = 2. Genotypes were assigned to the two clusters (Cluster 1 “Tetraploids” and Cluster 2 “High ploidy”) when their estimated membership to the pre-defined tetraploid genetic population was respectively over 90% and below 10%. Genotypes were considered admixed among the two clusters when their assignation to Cluster 1 (“Tetraploids”) was over 10% and below 90%.
AFLP genotypes (defined by a threshold of 12 mismatches) shared among cytotypes of Potentilla puberula Krašan. Number of clones are reported by cytotype. The shared genotypes present 2.71% of the genotypes observed.
| Genotype | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | N clones | N cytotypes sharing genotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g027 | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | 2 | 2 |
| g065 | – | 1 | – | 3 | – | 4 | 2 |
| g100 | – | 3 | – | 1 | – | 4 | 2 |
| g109 | – | 2 | – | 1 | – | 3 | 2 |
| g182 | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | 2 | 2 |
| g198 | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| g256 | – | – | – | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| g262 | 1 | 3 | – | 1 | – | 5 | 3 |
| g302 | – | – | 2 | – | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| g321 | – | 1 | – | 2 | – | 3 | 2 |
| g365 | – | 1 | – | – | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| g389 | – | – | 1 | – | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| g488 | – | 3 | – | 2 | – | 5 | 2 |
| g512 | – | – | 1 | – | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| g527 | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | 2 | 2 |
Number of individuals of Potentilla puberula Krašan sharing the same cpDNA haplotype, reported by ploidy level.
| Haplotype | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | N | Nc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H18 | 82 | 91 | 18 | 58 | 24 | 273 | 5 |
| H01 | 38 | 38 | – | 10 | 7 | 93 | 4 |
| H19 | 24 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 55 | 5 |
| H17 | 18 | 11 | 1 | 2 | – | 32 | 4 |
| H02 | 7 | 2 | 19 | 1 | – | 29 | 4 |
| H03 | 12 | 3 | – | 7 | – | 22 | 3 |
| H31 | 8 | – | – | 11 | – | 19 | 2 |
| H28 | 10 | – | 2 | 2 | – | 14 | 3 |
| H30 | 3 | 5 | 1 | – | 4 | 13 | 4 |
| H29 | – | 9 | – | 2 | – | 11 | 2 |
| H42 | 1 | 7 | – | 3 | – | 11 | 3 |
| H23 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | – | 10 | 4 |
| H26 | – | 5 | – | 5 | – | 10 | 2 |
| H04 | 2 | 2 | 4 | – | – | 8 | 3 |
| H14 | – | 7 | – | 1 | – | 8 | 2 |
| H08 | 2 | – | 3 | – | 2 | 7 | 3 |
| H21 | 2 | 5 | – | – | – | 7 | 2 |
| H33 | 1 | – | 4 | 2 | – | 7 | 3 |
| H41 | 1 | 4 | – | 2 | – | 7 | 3 |
| H06 | 1 | 1 | – | 4 | – | 6 | 3 |
| H15 | 5 | – | 1 | – | – | 6 | 2 |
| H37 | 5 | – | 1 | – | – | 6 | 2 |
| H22 | 4 | 1 | – | – | – | 5 | 2 |
| H25 | – | 2 | – | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| H32 | 2 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| H40 | 5 | – | – | – | – | 5 | 1 |
| H07 | – | 4 | – | – | – | 4 | 1 |
| H24 | 3 | 1 | – | – | – | 4 | 2 |
| H34 | – | 4 | – | – | – | 4 | 1 |
| H39 | – | – | – | 4 | – | 4 | 1 |
| H27 | 1 | – | – | 2 | – | 3 | 2 |
| H48 | – | – | – | 3 | – | 3 | 1 |
| H10 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 1 |
| H16 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 1 |
| H20 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | 2 | 2 |
| H35 | – | 2 | – | – | – | 2 | 1 |
| H38 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 1 |
| H47 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | 2 | 2 |
| H05 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| H09 | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H11 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H12 | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H13 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H36 | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H43 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H44 | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H45 | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H46 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
| H49 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 |
N: total number of individuals per haplotype; Nc: number of cytotypes sharing the same haplotype.
Fig. 1Principal Coordinate Analysis of 251 unique genotypes of nine Potentilla L. taxa based on 335 AFLP markers. The coordinates 1 and 2 explain 26.66% and 7.90% of the total genetic variation, respectively.
Fig. 2Individual cluster assignment of 251 single genotypes of nine Potentilla L. taxa resulting from a STRUCTURE analysis based on 335 AFLP markers. A, K = 4, run with the highest likelihood; B, Logarithmic likelihood of each run per K value.
Fig. 3Occurrence of three presumably parthenogenetic-specific AFLP fragments (170 VIC, 219 FAM, 286 FAM) in genotypes of Potentilla puberula Krašan classified by reproductive mode. A: apomixis; HP: haploid parthenogenesis; Sirreg: irregular sexuality (BIII hybrids formation); Sreg: regular sexuality.
Fig. 4Principal coordinate analysis of 554 unique genotypes of Potentilla puberula Krašan based on 370 AFLP markers. The coordinates 1 and 2 explain 4.04% and 2.51% of the total genetic variation, respectively. A: apomixis; HP: haploid parthenogenesis; Sirreg: irregular sexuality (BIII hybrids formation); Sreg: regular sexuality.
Fig. 5Results of the intraspecific STRUCTURE analysis of 554 single genotypes of Potentilla puberula Krašan. A, Individual cluster membership based on the run with the highest likelihood per K. The asterisk indicates apomictic tetraploid genotypes. B, Logarithmic likelihood of single runs per K value.
Percentages of seeds derived by different reproductive modes in 37 prevalently apomictic, 9 facultative apomictic, and 12 obligate sexual individuals.
| Individual reproductive mode | A | HP | Sreg | Sirreg | N seeds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apomictic | 96.87 | 0.10 | 0.78 | 2.25 | 1023 |
| Mixed | 75.83 | 3.79 | 12.32 | 8.06 | 211 |
| Sexual | 0.00 | 0.00 | 98.91 | 1.09 | 276 |
Data derived from Dobeš & al. (2018). A: apomixis (apomeiosis and parthenogenesis); HP: haploid parthenogenesis; Sreg: regular sexuality (meiosis and fertilisation); Sirreg: irregular sexuality (BIII hybrids formation).
All cytotypes represented.
Only tetraploid individuals were determined as obligate sexual.