Literature DB >> 30799491

Timing of Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Snapshot of Current Trends and Systematic Review of Literature on Changing Paradigm towards Early Surgery.

Amey R Savardekar1, Vinayak Narayan1, Devi P Patra1, Robert F Spetzler2, Hai Sun1.   

Abstract

Carotid revascularization has been recommended as the maximally beneficial treatment for stroke prevention in patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS). The appropriate timing for performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within the first 14 d after the occurrence of the index event remains controversial. We aim to provide a snapshot of the pertinent current literature related to the timing of CEA for patients with SCS. A systematic review of literature was conducted to study the timing of CEA for SCS. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) were followed. A total of 63 articles were identified as relevant to this topic. A summary of 15 articles favoring urgent CEA (within 48 h) for SCS within 48 h of index event and 9 articles not favoring urgent CEA is presented. A consensus is still to be achieved on the ideal timing of CEA for SCS within the 14-d window presently prescribed. The current literature suggests that patients who undergo urgent CEA (within 48 h) after nondisabling stroke as the index event have an increased periprocedural risk as compared to those who had transient ischemic attack (TIA) as the index event. Further prospective studies and clinical trials studying this question with separate groups classified as per the index event are required to shed more light on the subject. The current literature points to a changing paradigm towards early carotid surgery, specifically targeted within 48 h if the index event is TIA, and within 7 d if the index event is stroke.
Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid endarterectomy; Carotid occlusive disease; Carotid revascularization; Carotid stenosis; Carotid stenting; Periprocedural outcome; Periprocedural risks; Stroke; TIA; Timing; Transient ischemic attack

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30799491     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  4 in total

1.  External Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Improve Selection of Patients for Carotid Endarterectomy.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Reinier A R Herings; Kirsten Dansey; Johanna A A Damen; Jacoba P Greving; Marc L Schermerhorn; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Clinical perspectives on ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Atsushi Mizuma; Midori A Yenari
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Clinically induced hypothermia with cardiopulmonary support in a high-risk patient undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Kjersti Hervik; Torvind Olav Næsheim; Truls Myrmel; Thomas Dammann; Ramez Bahar
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2022-03-04

4.  Changes in Neuroendovascular Procedural Volume During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Samiat Agunbiade; Wei Huang; Iqra N Akhtar; Michael G Abraham; Naveed Akhtar; Fawaz Al-Mufti; Emrah Aytac; Ferhat Balgetir; Mikayel Grigoryan; Camilo R Gomez; Ameer E Hassan; Vishal Jani; Nazli A Janjua; Liqun Jiao; Rakesh Khatri; Jawad F Kirmani; Adam Kobayashi; Osman Kozak; Jun Lee; Iryna Lobanova; Ossama Yassin Mansour; Alberto Maud; Mikael Mazighi; Michel Piotin; Gustavo J Rodriguez; Farhan Siddiq; M Fareed K Suri; Wondwossen G Tekle
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.324

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.