| Literature DB >> 30799319 |
Abstract
Chloroxylenol (CHL) is an antimicrobial ingredient that is frequently used in antiseptics/disinfectants for skin (e.g. hand soap) and non-living surfaces. CHL is an alternative to triclosan and triclocarban, the use of which has recently been banned in some countries. Accordingly, the more widespread use of CHL may significantly increase its occurrence and level in aquatic environments in the near future, eventually resulting in potential ecological risks. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) may be a point source of CHL in natural environments due to extensive discharge through urban waste stream disposal. While the satisfactory removal of CHL in WWTPs is critical for maintaining healthy aquatic ecosystems, the extent of CHL removal and whether CHL causes system upset/failure in WWTPs currently remain unknown. In the present study, we conducted bioreactor operation and batch experiments to investigate the fate and effects of CHL and elucidate the mechanisms underlying degradation at various levels from environmentally relevant to high levels (0.5-5 mg L-1). Bioreactors partially removed CHL (44-87%) via a largely biological route. Microbial association networks constructed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing data revealed selective enrichment and a correlation between Sphingobium and CHL, implying its involvement in the biological breakdown of CHL through dehalogenation and ring hydroxylation pathways. The present results provide insights into the behavior and effects of CHL in activated sludge communities and important information for the sustainable management of CHL that may be an emerging issue in the urban water cycle.Entities:
Keywords: Sphingobium; biodegradation; biological wastewater treatment; chloroxylenol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30799319 PMCID: PMC6594741 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME18124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Fig. 1Time course of the removal of CHL in semi-continuous bioreactors. Removal rates in the CHL0.5 (A) and CHL5 (B) reactors. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from the mean.
Fig. 2Association networks of bacterial genera. A network analysis of major genera (>1% of relative abundance) was performed using CoNet (8) as described previously (21). The relationship in terms of relative abundance between any two genera was defined based on Pearson’s correlation metric. Each circle represents a genus. The size of the circle represents the average relative abundance of the genus across all communities, and the value is shown in the circle. The circle is color-coded (see key) based on the phylogenetic affiliation. Each edge represents a positive association with >0.6 Pearson’s correlation coefficient and P<0.05. No negative association with Pearson’s R<−0.6 with P<0.05 was observed.
Fig. 3CHL concentration profile in batch experiments. (A) Time course of the removal of CHL in abiotic (●), inactive (○), and bioticCHL+Glc (Δ). (B) COD concentration and cell growth (OD600) in the bioticCHL+Glc setting. (C) Time course of the removal of CHL in the bioticCHL setting, in which CHL was used as a sole carbon source. The Modified Gompertz model (red dashed line) was used to fit CHL removal data over time. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from the mean.
Kinetic parameters of CHL biodegradation
| Modified Gompertz model: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition | ||||
| BioticCHL | 0.99 | 5.10±0.09 | 1.13±0.01 | 23.3±0.01 |
| BioticCHL+Glc | 0.97 | 5.46±0.07 | 0.05±0.01 | 3.09±0.21 |
A is the biodegradation potential.
μm is the maximum biodegradation rate.
λ is the phase lag time.