Literature DB >> 30798643

The effectiveness of somatosensory retraining for improving sensory function in the arm following stroke: a systematic review.

Megan L Turville1,2, Liana S Cahill1,2,3, Thomas A Matyas1,2,4, Jannette M Blennerhassett5, Leeanne M Carey1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate if somatosensory retraining programmes assist people to improve somatosensory discrimination skills and arm functioning after stroke. DATA SOURCES: Nine databases were systematically searched: Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychInfo, Embase, Amed, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, OT seeker, and Cochrane Library. REVIEW
METHODS: Studies were included for review if they involved (1) adult participants who had somatosensory impairment in the arm after stroke, (2) a programme targeted at retraining somatosensation, (3) a primary measure of somatosensory discrimination skills in the arm, and (4) an intervention study design (e.g. randomized or non-randomized control designs).
RESULTS: A total of 6779 articles were screened. Five group trials and five single case experimental designs were included ( N = 199 stroke survivors). Six studies focused exclusively on retraining somatosensation and four studies focused on somatosensation and motor retraining. Standardized somatosensory measures were typically used for tactile, proprioception, and haptic object recognition modalities. Sensory intervention effect sizes ranged from 0.3 to 2.2, with an average effect size of 0.85 across somatosensory modalities. A majority of effect sizes for proprioception and tactile somatosensory domains were greater than 0.5, and all but one of the intervention effect sizes were larger than the control effect sizes, at least as point estimates. Six studies measured motor and/or functional arm outcomes ( n = 89 participants), with narrative analysis suggesting a trend towards improvement in arm use after somatosensory retraining.
CONCLUSION: Somatosensory retraining may assist people to regain somatosensory discrimination skills in the arm after stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; effect size; intervention; somatosensation; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30798643     DOI: 10.1177/0269215519829795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  7 in total

1.  A Novel Clinical-Driven Design for Robotic Hand Rehabilitation: Combining Sensory Training, Effortless Setup, and Large Range of Motion in a Palmar Device.

Authors:  Raphael Rätz; François Conti; René M Müri; Laura Marchal-Crespo
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Experiences of Upper Limb Somatosensory Retraining in Persons With Stroke: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

Authors:  Megan L Turville; Johanne Walker; Jannette M Blennerhassett; Leeanne M Carey
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Factors influencing allied health professionals' implementation of upper limb sensory rehabilitation for stroke survivors: a qualitative study to inform knowledge translation.

Authors:  Liana S Cahill; Leeanne M Carey; Yvonne Mak-Yuen; Annie McCluskey; Cheryl Neilson; Denise A O'Connor; Natasha A Lannin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Proprioceptive Training with Visual Feedback Improves Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jieying He; Chong Li; Jiali Lin; Beibei Shu; Bin Ye; Jianhui Wang; Yifang Lin; Jie Jia
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Enhancing touch sensibility by sensory retraining in a sensory discrimination task via haptic rendering.

Authors:  Eduardo Villar Ortega; Efe Anil Aksöz; Karin A Buetler; Laura Marchal-Crespo
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  Is Recovery of Somatosensory Impairment Conditional for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery Early After Stroke?

Authors:  Sarah B Zandvliet; Gert Kwakkel; Rinske H M Nijland; Erwin E H van Wegen; Carel G M Meskers
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  The Repetitive Mechanical Tactile Stimulus Intervention Effects Depend on Input Methods.

Authors:  Hiraku Watanabe; Sho Kojima; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.