Literature DB >> 30798493

Exaptation at the molecular genetic level.

Jürgen Brosius1,2.   

Abstract

The realization that body parts of animals and plants can be recruited or coopted for novel functions dates back to, or even predates the observations of Darwin. S.J. Gould and E.S. Vrba recognized a mode of evolution of characters that differs from adaptation. The umbrella term aptation was supplemented with the concept of exaptation. Unlike adaptations, which are restricted to features built by selection for their current role, exaptations are features that currently enhance fitness, even though their present role was not a result of natural selection. Exaptations can also arise from nonaptations; these are characters which had previously been evolving neutrally. All nonaptations are potential exaptations. The concept of exaptation was expanded to the molecular genetic level which aided greatly in understanding the enormous potential of neutrally evolving repetitive DNA-including transposed elements, formerly considered junk DNA-for the evolution of genes and genomes. The distinction between adaptations and exaptations is outlined in this review and examples are given. Also elaborated on is the fact that such distinctions are sometimes more difficult to determine; this is a widespread phenomenon in biology, where continua abound and clear borders between states and definitions are rare.

Keywords:  adaptation; aptation; cooptation; de novo genes; exaptation; neofunctionalization; non-protein coding RNA; novel functional gene modules; recruitment; retrogenes; subfunctionalization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30798493     DOI: 10.1007/s11427-018-9447-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci China Life Sci        ISSN: 1674-7305            Impact factor:   6.038


  7 in total

1.  What We Talk About When We Talk About "Junk DNA".

Authors:  Nelson J R Fagundes; Rafael Bisso-Machado; Pedro I C C Figueiredo; Maikel Varal; André L S Zani
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.065

Review 2.  Retrotransposons as Drivers of Mammalian Brain Evolution.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrari; Nicole Grandi; Enzo Tramontano; Giorgio Dieci
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

3.  Adaptation and Exaptation: From Small Molecules to Feathers.

Authors:  Moran Frenkel-Pinter; Anton S Petrov; Kavita Matange; Michael Travisano; Jennifer B Glass; Loren Dean Williams
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  The vertebrate- and testis- specific transmembrane protein C11ORF94 plays a critical role in sperm-oocyte membrane binding.

Authors:  Hongying Hao; Baolu Shi; Jiacheng Zhang; Ao Dai; Wenhao Li; Haidi Chen; Wenya Ji; Chenjia Gong; Chang Zhang; Jing Li; Li Chen; Bin Yao; Peng Hu; Hao Yang; Juergen Brosius; Shanshan Lai; Qinghua Shi; Cheng Deng
Journal:  Mol Biomed       Date:  2022-09-02

5.  The Dispensable Roles of X-Linked Ubl4a and Its Autosomal Counterpart Ubl4b in Spermatogenesis Represent a New Evolutionary Type of X-Derived Retrogenes.

Authors:  Changping Yu; Runjie Diao; Ranjha Khan; Cheng Deng; Hui Ma; Zhijie Chang; Xiaohua Jiang; Qinghua Shi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Circular RNA Encoded Amyloid Beta peptides-A Novel Putative Player in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Dingding Mo; Xinping Li; Carsten A Raabe; Timofey S Rozhdestvensky; Boris V Skryabin; Juergen Brosius
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Mutational Characteristics of Causative Genes in Chinese Hereditary Spherocytosis Patients: a Report on Fourteen Cases and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Li Song; Li Shen; Kaihui Zhang; Yuqiang Lv; Min Gao; Jian Ma; Ya Wan; Zhongtao Gai; Yi Liu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.