Catherine Petit1, Sylvie Schmeltz1, Alexandre Burgy1, Henri Tenenbaum1, Olivier Huck1, Jean-Luc Davideau2. 1. Department of Periodontology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, 8 rue Sainte-Elisabeth, 67000, Strasbourg, France. 2. Department of Periodontology, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, 8 rue Sainte-Elisabeth, 67000, Strasbourg, France. jldcabfra@wanadoo.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine factors influencing tooth loss during a long-term follow-up, emphasizing the impact of various compliance definitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with periodontitis who were treated and presenting for maintenance care for at least up to 6 years were included. The effects of compliance and other patient- and treatment-related factors on tooth loss were assessed. Lack of compliance was defined in three ways: (1) fewer than 1.4 visits per year (irregular compliers), (2) no maintenance visit over a 2-year period (erratic compliers), and (3) no maintenance visit over a 2- to 5-year period (partial compliers) and no maintenance visit for a period of more than 5 years (non-compliers). RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were selected. The mean follow-up was 9.72 ± 1.17 years. Tooth loss per patient-year was significantly higher in erratic compliers (0.35 ± 0.19) and non-compliers (0.40 ± 0.20) compared with compliers (0.18 ± 0.10). No significant differences were found for irregular (0.30 ± 0.17) and partial (0.25 ± 0.15) compliers. Similar results were obtained for the number of patients who lost more than three teeth. Multivariable regression analysis showed that lack of compliance and periodontitis severity (more than 3% of periodontal pockets > 7 mm at baseline) were independent risk factors for tooth loss. CONCLUSIONS: During long-term follow-up, non-compliance and initial periodontitis severity were the principal risk factors that increased tooth loss. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tooth loss associated with lack of compliance was essentially observed in patients with long continuous periods without maintenance visits and was less influenced by patients' attended mean visit frequency.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to determine factors influencing tooth loss during a long-term follow-up, emphasizing the impact of various compliance definitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with periodontitis who were treated and presenting for maintenance care for at least up to 6 years were included. The effects of compliance and other patient- and treatment-related factors on tooth loss were assessed. Lack of compliance was defined in three ways: (1) fewer than 1.4 visits per year (irregular compliers), (2) no maintenance visit over a 2-year period (erratic compliers), and (3) no maintenance visit over a 2- to 5-year period (partial compliers) and no maintenance visit for a period of more than 5 years (non-compliers). RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were selected. The mean follow-up was 9.72 ± 1.17 years. Tooth loss per patient-year was significantly higher in erratic compliers (0.35 ± 0.19) and non-compliers (0.40 ± 0.20) compared with compliers (0.18 ± 0.10). No significant differences were found for irregular (0.30 ± 0.17) and partial (0.25 ± 0.15) compliers. Similar results were obtained for the number of patients who lost more than three teeth. Multivariable regression analysis showed that lack of compliance and periodontitis severity (more than 3% of periodontal pockets > 7 mm at baseline) were independent risk factors for tooth loss. CONCLUSIONS: During long-term follow-up, non-compliance and initial periodontitis severity were the principal risk factors that increased tooth loss. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tooth loss associated with lack of compliance was essentially observed in patients with long continuous periods without maintenance visits and was less influenced by patients' attended mean visit frequency.